Via Dr. Polland; - “Fraud in the USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy.” -
Dr. Ronald J. Polland, PhD, has posted on YouTube a series of videos that are part of a book he has been writing for two years. The title is “Fraud in the USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy.”
As described in his, “About Me” video, Dr. Polland’s expertise is in Research and Program Evaluation, with over 31 years of post-doctoral scientific research experience. He is also the leading authority on scanning, photographing, (and videotaping) both sides of authentic, paper Hawaiian COLBs.
Because of YouTube length restrictions, Chapter 1 has been split over four parts (uploaded now) and Chapter 2 has been split over two parts (will be uploaded by 6pm EST). He has also posted an “About Me” video that has his full credentials and highlights important aspects of his career. [all posted below]
Dr. Ronald J. Polland was the infamous Dr. Pollarik (AKA) Source.
This is Chapter 1, Part 1-4 of "FRAUD IN THE USA: The end of the birth certificate controversy,"...
Dr. Polland's Youtube channel is located here, ht OFI & Commander Kerchner...
13 comments:
this fraud need to be charged!!!obama your days in office is comeing to a end 2012 get out and vote now
BHO genocide Joke on America “Of course, that’s not the only thing we’ve been accused of socialiizing this year,” he said. “You might have heard we passed a healthcare bill… Some Republicans have claimed the bill includes a few secret provisions. That’s ridiculous. There aren’t a few secret provisions in the healthcare bill, there are like hundreds….”
Recently, Justice Clarence Thomas came out publicly where he stated that he does not believe that soetoro/obama is eligible to be president. What power or influence does Justice Thomas have to put this issue on the front burner so that soetoro/obama or what ever his name is be removed from office and tried and sentenced to prison for Treason against the United States of America?
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Admits They're Evading Eligibility Issue, Attorney Mario Apuzzo Responds...
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/04/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas.html
Someone should take this info and actually do A VIDEO!!
great information...but it is enough to KILL a person!
Come on....read the constitution for yourself. The info here is bogus in one fact. The Constitution does NOT state BOTH parents must be US Citizens. This one inaccuracy calls into question the accuracy of the entire argument.
Come on....Article II of the Constitution clearly states; “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;…”
Unless Obama is 200+ years old he is not Constitutionally Eligible to be POTUS.
It's pretty simple; we know from 4 SCOTUS rulings(below), and many other historical records, that a "natural born Citizen" is one born on soil to Citizen parentS(PLURAL). The SCOTUS says that there have never been any doubts as to the status of these children.
The founders didn't need to define "natural born Citizen" in the Constitution... It was well known there is a difference in natural born Citizen and Citizen, anyone with a lick of sense can read Article II and see that...
4 SCOTUS Rulings that mention a Natural-Born Citizen is one born on soil to citizen parentS; United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that (all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.) http://supreme.justia.com/us/169/649/case.html#649
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that (all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.) Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. http://supreme.justia.com/us/88/162/case.html#162
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830) If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, (for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country.) Her citizenship, then, being prima facie established, and indeed this is admitted in the pleadings, has it ever been lost, or was it lost before the death of her father, so that the estate in question was, upon the descent cast, incapable of vesting in her? Upon the facts stated, it appears to us that it was not lost and that she was capable of taking it at the time of the descent cast. http://supreme.justia.com/us/28/242/case.html
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814) “The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. (The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens.) Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. http://supreme.justia.com/us/12/253/case.html
One of the main drafters of the 14th amendment; “I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen" - John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866
If BOTH parents must be citizens, then why are Mexican women pouring over the border in their 9th month in hopes of giving birth on US soil? Those children are considered US citizens by virtue of their birth here, but where's Dad?
The s in parentheses is always taken to mean either one, or both.
Yes, Citizen, not "natural born Citizen"...
"If BOTH parents must be citizens, then why are Mexican women pouring over the border in their 9th month in hopes of giving birth on US soil?"
Because the child will be born a citizen, but not natural born to the country. Nonetheless, it's a quick fix to speeding up naturalization and the family generally gets health benefits and so forth. Basically, Mommy pops a kid out like the Queen Mary releases an anchor and for the same purpose - to stay put.
But the kid is not "natural born".
Besides, I think everyone should stop second-guessing and therefore waste valuable time debating the what-if's. There should be no "what-if's". Obama, should absolutely, 100% just release the records and get this over with and everyone else should keep shouting about it until something breaks. The more academic debating that goes on, the less shouting happens - which is exactly the way the left likes it.
Besides, along with talking here, go the comments sections of things like MSN and Yahoo news and make lots of noise there. On the first comments page of a story if you can.
Also, someone is selling Obama Birth certificate stamps to stamp the message everywhere, like dollar bills, which is absolutely brilliant, and you can get your own made at Staples or Office Max for a few bucks. Can you imagine in 3 weeks every single dollar bill in the US having that unavoidable message?!
Let’s roll boys and girls. If it walks and smells like a skunk, it probably doesn’t have a long form birth certificate. Let’s find out.
Anonymous is clearly one of the Flying Monkey Squadron members.
His claims are nonsense.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.