Sunday, June 6, 2010

Is LTC Terry Lakin's Article 32 Hearing, scheduled for 6/11/10, legitimate with an ineligible Commander-in-Chief? Got Time!?

Via the Post & Email and some; - Lt. Col. Lakin’s Article 32 Hearing is not legitimate without an eligible Commander-in-Chief - LEGITIMACY OF HEARING MUST BE ESTABLISHED BEFORE IT CAN COMMENCE -

by Catherine Whitfield (6/5/2010) - Without a legitimate Commander-in-Chief, an Article 32 hearing cannot take place. Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin has refused to follow orders until Barack Hussein Obama proves that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief.  If Obama’s eligibility has not been established before the Article 32 hearing scheduled for Lakin on June 11, 2010, then it is illegitimate.

Even the officer delivering the charges to Lt. Col. Lakin did not have the authority to do so if Obama is not constitutionally qualified.

A retired Navy Commander subject to recall filed a criminal complaint against Obama on March 17, 2009 and was neither arrested nor court-martialed, even after the complaint had been served to numerous courts across the country.  The complaint charged Obama with treason and was never answered.    Why wasn’t Fitzpatrick arrested and court-martialed for accusing Obama of the most serious of crimes:  treason?

When Major Stefan Cook challenged Obama’s orders for the same reason Lakin has, his deployment orders were revoked. Obama never answered the question as to whether or not he is constitutionally eligible.  Cook was neither arrested nor court-martialed because Obama chose not to answer the charges.  One writer commented that “Rather than contesting the suit, the Army took the highly peculiar step of revoking the major’s deployment order, suggesting that the Pentagon generals are not entirely confident that they can demonstrate the legitimacy of their purported commander in chief.”

What does this mean?  How could any hearing possibly be legitimate if there is no legitimate Commander-in-Chief?  How could anything the military is doing right now be legitimate?

Lt. Col. Driscoll, the Investigating Officer who issued a decision on June 1, 2010 not to allow certain evidence and testimony for the upcoming hearing for Lakin, must be asked before the hearing even begins if he knows for a fact that he holds proper authority to convene it.  That means that he must have evidence that Obama is a “natural born Citizen” and meets the other constitutional requirements to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces.  If he does not, then he does not have authority to conduct the hearing.

Lakin’s attorneys need to demand that Driscoll show by what authority he will convene the Article 32 hearing.  Otherwise, it will be nothing but a sham, and Lakin will never get justice.  It is not Lakin who should have to prove anything; it is Driscoll and everyone in his  chain of command, right up to Obama.

Driscoll must prove that Obama is legitimate.  The question needs to be asked now, before the hearing date.  And Driscoll cannot say that it is Congress’s job to determine whether or not Obama is qualified.  It is his job.  Because if Obama is a usurper and Driscoll pretends otherwise, then he is the one who should be court-martialed, not Lakin.

The military must solve this problem.  The nation is waiting.  How much longer can this go on?  

Source. Previous reports on LTC Lakin from the Post & Email here, and more on LTC Lakin from Birther Report here. [END]

Contact your Elected official(s) and demand they act now, here; http://conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm

The Office of Congressional Ethics accepts allegations and details of misbehavior from the public in a section allowing for "public input" about members of Congress.  It also gives an e-mail option for information that comes from the public.  Send your complaint(s) about your reps inactions today by going here; http://oce.house.gov/public-input.html

If you wish, contact LTC Daniel J. Driscoll, Investigating Officer in the LTC Lakin court-martial.  Also remind him he took the same oath as LTC Terry Lakin; driscoll@amedd.army.mil   That goes for the other Military officials as well.

The only person that should be under investigation is Obama aka Soetoro. Call, email, write, and demand they investigate Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro, instead of Lt. Col. Lakin.  Obama's Social Security Problem(s) should be enough to warrant such an investigation.

We must show the Military leaders that we stand with Lt. Col. Terry Lakin and we want this issue resolved. Please Be Respectful.

Army Spokesman, Chuck Dasey at (202) 782-7500 or e-mail at him at chuck.dasey@us.army.mil

Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, inquire with pentagon switchboard.

Pentagon Switchboard
(703) 545-6700

Pentagon Public Inquiries - 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday - Friday (Eastern Time Zone) - call (703) 571-3343

Pentagon
1400 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1400
(703) 697-1776

Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20318-9999

Contacting Senior Army Leaders
If you would like to contact a Senior Army leader (Secretary of the Army, Chief of Staff of the Army, Sergeant Major of the Army) please use the following address:

The address for mail would be as follows:
(Name of recipient) ie; Chief of Staff of the Army... Secretary of the Army... etc.
1400 Defense Pentagon
Washington DC 20301-1400

Department of Defense web comment form; http://www.defense.gov/landing/questions.aspx

  


Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Letter to Barack Obama                                                              
- Lt. Col. Lakin - Press Release April 13 2010: You Have the Right to Remain Silent  -                                                              
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Charge Sheet
Army Sets Court-Martial Hearing in Criminal Case Against Decorated Army Physician, LTC Terry Lakin -                                                              
Ruling on Defense Request for Witnesses and Evidence in LTC Lakin's court-martial - 6/1/2010                                                            
Obama an Unconstitutional Illegal President - 20100201 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5                                                            




Below is an interview with LTC. Terry Lakin on the G. Gordon Liddy show, recorded on 4/20/10, and some...













7 comments:

Anonymous said...[Reply]

It is evident that you can't go from the top down trying to force the federal gov to do what it should simply because it would cause a constitutional crisis not to mention political careers. The news media is complicit in this coverup. Their motives are more self preservation in todays politically correct world.
If someone wants to find out the truth it should be and could be from the state level. The democratic party had to certify their candidates to ever state election commission. If there are doubts as to the validity of those certifications then there in is the avenue for determining the truth. Suits should have been brought against the Democratic certifying official. This could be done in all 50 states.

Anonymous said...[Reply]

Read "the theory is now a conspiracy and facts don't lie." Canada free press, by J.B. Williams.
There were 2 different papers signed regarding Obama's eligibility by Pelosi and others. They conveniently left out

Anonymous said...[Reply]

The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.

However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document myself.

Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these "certified" candidates on the ballot.

The "Official Certification of Nomination" that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.

But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;

"- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."
The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:

Read Canadafreepress
"The theory is now a conspiracy." By J.B. Williams

they purposely left out the wording on Obama's eligibility. Why were 2 different forms signed?
To protect them if this ever came up in court. Pelosi and others never said Obama was legally eligible!

Anonymous said...[Reply]

Pelosi left out that Obama was legally qualified. Funny thing to leave out, don't you think? This should be investigated. It was dated 8-28-08.

ObamaRelease YourRecords said...[Reply]

A True Enigma; Two Different DNC Forms, Five Failed Attempts to Re-Define Natural Born Citizen...

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/true-enigma-two-different-dnc-forms.html

Anonymous said...[Reply]

Pelosi should be investigated regarding the eligibility problem that exists, million of Americans want to know, The Military MUST know now, especially in time of war!
This issue has gone on for far too long now. INVESTIGATE PELOSI NOW.

Anonymous said...[Reply]

The courts are suppressing information vital to the existence of the American Constitution.

RULE OF LAW vs RULES OF PROCEDURE......Obama thinks Procedure will protect him and so far, it has.

Post a Comment

“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)

I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.

Follow ORYR by Email

About Me

My Photo
ORYR FB Group; http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=248105051039 ##### New ORYR Fan Page; http://www.facebook.com/pages/Obarack-Release-Your-Records/207517629659
 
Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records. Design by Wpthemedesigner. Converted To Blogger Template By Anshul Tested by Blogger Templates.