Update(9/14): this dismissal order was at the appeals level for the Department of Homeland Security releasing information on Obama himself. This particular dismissal order does not have anything to do with the Stanley Ann Dunham/Soetoro FOIA lawsuit regarding the fraud and destruction of records at the State Department.
Previous reports on Strunk v Obama can be found here, here, here, here, and here.
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Appellant
v.
United States Department of State and
U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
Appellees
O R D E R
By order filed June 4, 2010, appellant was to show cause by July 6, 2010, why
this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. To date, no response from
the appellant has been received by this court. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that this case be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See D.C. Cir.
Rule 38.
The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate in this case by October 12, 2010.
Strunk v DoS - Strunk Second Supplement Declaration With Exhibits - DCD 08 Cv 2234 - 8/25/10
3 comments:
What happens with his recent filings? Can he appeal it?
Only the complaint against DHS and obama was dismissed. The current suit is regarding committing fraud on that particular court. The court owes and answer on State Dept. on Thrs.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/37579996/Strunk-v-u-s-Department-of-State-Doj-Reply-Brief
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.