DUNHAM/OBAMA/SOETORO FOIA UPDATE: This is in regards to the recent partial-dump of Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama/Soetoro's passport records under the FOIA. As previously reported here, all pre-1965 passport records for Stanley Ann Dunham(Obama's Mama) were said to be destroyed even though they are required to maintain passport records for 100 years.

Christopher Strunk whom first obtained the Dunham records(after a court order) under the FOIA filed his 'Second Supplement Declaration in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss' on August 25, 2010. You can view the first 'Declaration in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss' that was filed on August 9, 2010, here. The complete second declaration is embedded below.

Update(9/9): Who is lying, and who is telling the truth? - WHY ARE THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND GSA SAYING DIFFERENT THINGS ABOUT PASSPORT RECORDS? - continued here.

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND SUPPLEMENT DECLARATION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS

I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse, declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746:

1. This is the second and final supplement declaration with Exhibits 11 through 12 annexed that are submitted in accordance with and by leave of the Court’s order of August 9, 2010 that Plaintiff respond by August 26, 2010 to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and this declaration supplements the August 8, 2010 Plaintiff response Declaration with Exhibits 1 through 5 including the supporting affidavit of Philip Hans Jacobsen with Exhibit A through F affirmed August 5, 2010 and Plaintiff’s Supplement Declaration with Exhibits 6 through 10 annexed of August 18, 2010 in opposition to Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Memorandum in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brigham J. Bowen (Counsel) with Department of State supporting declarations of Alex Galovich Acting Director of the Office of Information and Programs and Services of the United States Department of State (DOS) and Dorothy Pullo Director of the Freedom of Information Division, Office of international Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) dated July 29, 2010.

2. That on August 21, 2010 Plaintiff was contacted by William A. Richardson of Chattanooga Tennessee in regards to his independent research done in regards to the allegation that the General Services Administration (GSA) gave direction to DOS to destroy passport records stated by Jonathan M. Rolbin, Director of the Office of Legal and Law Enforcement Liaison Bureau of Consular Affairs Passport Services in the matter with Case Control Number 200807238 with twelve pages of documents attached in the July 29, 2010 DOS FOIA response letter (the Letter) with the partial release of document to Plaintiff’s FOIA request for Stanley Ann Dunham.

3. That Mr. Richardson produced a sworn Affidavit with Exhibit A through D annexed thereto explaining his research done with GSA and NARA in regards to the Letter, and received August 25, 2010 that Plaintiff / Declarant incorporates a fax copy in this second supplement see Exhibit 11 with Sub-exhibits A through D; and that when Plaintiff receives the original by mail it will be forwarded separately by judicial notice to the Court.

4. That according to the investigation done by Mr. Richardson the GSA officially denies giving any GSA directive to DOS to destroy DOS documents, and that as a result of Mr. Richardson efforts from August 2, 2010 through August 21, 2010 had been in correspondence with GSA representative Elizabeth Kelley (see Exhibit 11 sub exhibit C) GSA Program Management Officer from August 3, 2010 through August 12, 2010;

5. That Mr. Richards affidavit and direct investigation with the GSA’s Elizabeth Kelley in regards to what GSA controlling authority are to issued directives to DOS is quite clear, GSA has no such authority and that the GSA counsel is discussing the DOS Letter allegation of such directive accordingly; and goes to the DOS fraud upon this Court herein.

6. That on August 22, 2010 Plaintiff was contracted Mr. Jacobsen as an expert witness to corroborate the possibility of such a DOS / GSA directive to destroy records and was unable to find any.

7. That August 16, 2010, in furtherance of the investigation of the fraud upon the court herein, Mr. Jacobsen requested an expedited FOIA request of the National Archives in College park Maryland in furtherance of discovery of evidence of Defendants’ fraud upon the Court (see Exhibit 12).

8. The FOIA requests all Passenger and or Crew lists, BOTH Arrival and Departure information for BOTH vessels and airplanes identified as Record Group 85 at the National Archives, records of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, 1787-2004 for parties shown on Exhibit 12, quote:

“The records sought herein meet three (3) general classifications:

1. Those records outside of the 50 year restriction window and, as such, these records should be available for unrestricted use.

2. Those records within the 50 year restriction period but that pertain to deceased individuals and, as such, these records should be available for unrestricted use.

3. Those records which fall with the 50 year restriction period and relate to a living person. While these records are ordinarily exempt from disclosure, I herein claim a public interest and compelling need to verify government integrity and that each of these concerns outweighs the aforementioned restrictions…” “The DOJ Freedom of Information Guide, Exemption 6, states that: "One purpose that the FOIA was designed for is to "check against corruption and to hold the governors accountable to the governed. Indeed, information that would inform the public of violations of the public trust has a strong public interest and is accorded great weight in the balancing process. . . DOJ Guide citations omitted.

“I request EXPEDITED PROCESSING of this request. “In accordance with law, when the subject is of widespread and exceptional media interest and the information sought involves possible questions about the government's integrity that affects public confidence Expedited Processing is permitted. In this instant case the overwhelming concern of the American public concerning both the eligibility of Barack Obama to be President as well as the large number of questions about the government's integrity in vetting President Obama.

“In addition the recent (and apparently well founded) allegations that the US Government has "Spoliated" records from the US State Department passport records of the President's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham has put the public trust and integrity of its government into question…”

9. That Plaintiff based upon information by certain proof has shown there is a matter of spoliation of evidence, public records and misstatement in an egregious fraud upon this Court supported by Mr. Jacobsen’s and other parties request for records that should be the interest of this Court that they be released because there currently exists an overwhelming public interest in obtaining the information requested above and a desire by me and the general public to know who the President is. Plaintiff believes it is unprecedented in the history of the United States that the life, history and background of a sitting president has been so well hidden, sealed and obfuscated as it has with this President; and further, as Commander-in- Chief of the most powerful military in the world today, and as a President who openly declares that he wants to "fundamentally change the United States," the public interest far outweighs his personal privacy interest. There is no verifiable evidence in the public record that President Obama was ever vetted to hold the office of President; and that the information requested herein may shed light on the extent and scope of the fraud upon this Court as to the spoliation and cover-up that has occurred during this FOIA action herein as to the eligibility, or ineligibility of Mr. Obarna to be President of the United States; and Plaintiff/ Declarant believes the balancing process weighs heavily for release of his records, and that the information requested could prove that this President is ineligible to hold the office of President and prove that the public trust has been violated, and continues to be violated, now rests with this Court alone herein.

10. Wherefore Plaintiff as with the preceding Declaration and Supplement with MOL and based upon all the exhibits 1 through 12 wishes an expanded order of the Court denying Defendants’ motion for summary judgment to dismiss subject to a more definite statement of facts including grant of a second amended complaint expanding the search of years from November 29, 1942 through November 7, 1995 by order of Defendants and their agent to provide in the matter of further discovery of evidence of the fraud upon this court: ...continued on page 7.

Declaration from Philip H. Jacobsen on Obama's(Soebarkah) records;

RE: FOIA REQUEST - EXPEDITED PROCESSING

Dear FOIA Officer:

This is a request under the Freedom of information Act.

I request that I be provided with a copy of the documents (or documents that contain the following information) as follows: Passenger and or Crew lists, BOTH Arrival and Departure information for BOTH vessels and airplanes identified as Record Group 85 at the National Archives, records of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, 1787-2004.

According to the NARA description these documents are further described as follows:

This series of ship passenger and crew lists consists of forms provided to the Immigration and Naturalization Sewice (INS) by shipmasters of vessels .. . .arriving or departing various sea and airports.. On both ship passenger and crew lists, the typical information includes: name of the vessel and shipmaster, ports of arrival and embarkation, and dates of arrival (and occasionally of departure). Passenger lists provide the full name, age, sex, marital status, occupation, citizenship (nationality), last place of residence, final destination, and, ifan immigrant were going to join a relative, that person's name, address, and relationship to the passenger. Some manifests indicate the cabin number and class. Crew lists provide the full name of each crew member, position, length of service at sea, citizenship (nationality, literacy, age, sex, height and weight, any physically distinguishing marks, the date and place of employment, and whether the crew member was to be discharged or paid off at the port of arrival. Later lists for both passengers and crew may include passport numbers and or types of visas.

Besides vessel passenger and crew lists, this series contains forms for airline passenger and crew manifests. These forms were submitted to the INS by the captain of each airplane that last departed from a US. airport. Both the airline passenger and crew manifests contain the aircraft identification, captain's name, and dates and airports of departure and arrival. For each alien or citizen passenger, the record usually provides the person's name; citizenship; US. address; passport, visa, or other immigration document number; and may note the person's date and place of birth, destination, and baggage details. For each crew member, the record usually provides the person's name; position on the airplane; citizenship; passport, visa, or other immigration document number; and may note age and gender.

The records sought herein meet three (3) general classifications:

1. Those records outside of the 50 year restriction window and, as such, these records should be available for unrestricted use.

2. Those records within the 50 year restriction period but that pertain to deceased individuals and, as such, these records should be available for unrestricted use.

3. Those records which fall with the 50 year restriction period and relate to a living person. While these records are ordinarily exempt from disclosure, I herein claim a public interest and compelling need to verify government integrity and that each of these concerns out-weighs the aforementioned restrictions. Therefore, I am requesting all records described hereinabove for the following persons, including all AKA'S.

1. Stanley Ann Dunham
DOB: 1 1/29/1942
SSN: 535-40-8522
Aka Stanley Ann Obama
Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro
Stanley Ann Soetoro
Dr. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro
Ann Soetoro
Ann Dunham Sutoro
Time period requested: 01/01/1960 through 07/01/1983.

Stanley Ann Dunham- Obama is the deceased mother of the President of the United States, Barack Obama. It is common knowledge that she is deceased and she is listed in the Social Security Death Index as deceased under her Social Security Number.

2. Madelyn Lee Payne Dunham
DOB : 10/26/1 922
SSN: 558-20-7458
Time period requested: 0 110 111 960 through 0710 1/1983

Madelyn Payne Dunham is the grandmother of the President of the United States, Barack Obama. It is common knowledge that she is deceased and she is listed in the Social Security Death Index as deceased under her Social Security Number.

3. Stanley Amour Dunham
DOB: 03/23/1918
SSN: 5 14-03-4824
Time period requested: 0110 1/1960 through 0710 111983

Stanley Amour Dunham is the grandfather of the President of the United States, Barack Obama. It is common knowledge that he is deceased and he is listed in the Social Security Death Index as deceased under his Social Security Number.

4. Barack Hussein Obama Senior
DOB: 0410411 93 6
SSN: None known
Aka: Barack Hussein Obama.
Time period requested: 0 110 111 959 through 12/24/1982

Barack Obama Senior is the father of the President of the United States, Barack Obama. It is common knowledge that Barack Hussein Obama Senior is deceased as he died in a car crash in Nairobi, Africa on 11/24/1982.

5. Barack Hussein Obama II
DOB: 08104/6 1
SSN: Various
Aka: Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barry Soebarkah. Barack Soebarkah
Time period requested: 0 110 111 96 1 through 0710 1/1983

Barack Hussein Obama is the living President of the United States and I do not have a third party privacy act release fi-om him.

I believe his records should be released because there currently exists an overwhelming public interest in obtaining the infomation requested above and a desire by me and the general public to know who the President is. I believe it is unprecedented in the history of the United States that the life, history and background of a sitting president has been so well hidden, sealed and obfuscated as it has with this President.

Further, as Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful military in the world today, and as a President who openly declares that he wants to "fundamentally change the United States," the public interest far outweighs his personal privacy interest. There is no verifiable evidence in the public record that President Obama was ever vetted to hold the office of President. The information requested herein may shed light on the eligibility, or ineligibility of Mr. Obarna to be President of the United States. I believe the balancing process weighs heavily for release of his records. The information requested could prove that this President is ineligible to hold the office of President and prove that the public trust has been violated, and continues to be violated, What greater public interest could possibly exist than the possibility that a fraud has usurped the Office of President, who now has control over the greatest military on earth and has his finger hovering over the
button that could release the most powerful nuclear holocaust ever known to man and who now controls the destiny of each and every American citizen?

The DOJ Freedom of Information Guide, Exemption 6, states that:

"One purpose that the FOIA was designed for is to "check against corruption and to hold the governors accountable to the governed. Indeed, information that would inform the public of violations of the public trust has a strong public interest and is accorded great weight in the balancing process. 0 ' 9 . . . . DOJ Guide citations omitted.

I request EXPEDITED PROCESSING of this request.

In accordance with law, when the subject is of widespread and exceptional media interest and the information sought involves possible questions about the government's integrity that affects public confidence Expedited Processing is permitted. In this instant case the overwhelming concern of the American public concerning both the eligibility of Barack Obama to be President as well as the large number of questions about the government's integrity in vetting President Obama.

In addition the recent (and apparently well founded) allegations that the US Government has "Spoliated" records from the US State Department passport records of the President's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham has put the public trust and integrity of its government into question.

The public had been waiting for over 1 ?h years for a response to a FOIA request by Christopher Strunk to the State Department and Homeland Security. The request to Homeland security is similar to the above request, but produced a response fkom CBP that the travel records and documents prior to 1982 were destroyed and not archived. (Attachment 1 - Pullo Declaration) Additionally the State Department unbelievably stated that they were unable to locate Stanley Ann Dunham's passport applications prior to 1967 and that they were likely destroyed in the 1980's. Incredulously, as the keeper of the records, and they don't know if they were destroyed or not?!? This, in and of itself, raises serious questions of trust and integrity in the government. See Roblin letter as well as 1984 memo referencing "purging" and destroying passport applications prior to 1968. (Attachment 2 - Roblin letter)

Ironically the State Department on their website advertises Passport services to "search" their records from 1925 to the present for you for a fee of either $50 for your own records or $150 for third party records. (The price was just increased on or about 08/13/10) The State Department has no notice that records before 1968 "may" have been destroyed in a purge in the 1980's and it seems either they maintain the records they claim (and the National Archives also claims the State Department has) or they are unfairly advertising a service for sale that they likely don't have. Who is one to believe? On one hand the State Department makes the claim that passport records before 1968 don't exist and are destroyed. On the other hand the National Archives, Passport Services of the State Department, the Federal Register claim that passport records prior to 1968 do exist and in fact are held by the State Department. My own experience in requesting passport records unequivocally support the fact that passport records before 1968 do in fact exist and are held by the State Department. (Attachment 3 - Jacobsen affidavit)

In addition he public trust in FOIA had been diminished by the recent revelation that these requests are being monitored and appear to be delayed and in some cases the requestors are vetted before fulfilling the request. (Attachment 4 - AP article)

The President of the United States is a public figure and a recent CNN poll taken July 20 10 showed that 27% of the Americans polled probably or definitely believe President Obama was born in another country. In addition the poll showed 29 % of those polled believed Obama was probably born in the US and only 42% believed Obama was definitely born in the US, (Attachment 5 - CNN poll)

It is apparent that the public has serious questions about the integrity of the US Government relating to the eligibility of President Obama and the possible destruction of the few documents available that could shed light on the President's eligibility and family history. The documents I have requested herein all concern his family and are believed to contain information that could help determine his eligibility or ineligibility to the office of President. In addition, by Expedited Processing of my request, it will quickly help show the American public that the above records have not been destroyed, tampered with or compromised and that the integrity of the National Archives is intact and free from unlawful political tampering. The records I am requesting were collected by Immigration Officers paid for by taxpayers and the records are in the National Archives which was founded and paid for by taxpayers. These records belong to the people of the United States and not to the government. Additionally, many of these records are already unrestricted and many are fast approaching the 50 year time limit for release from restricted to unrestricted. Expedited Processing of this request will of course put the request to the head of the FOIA list, but it will eliminate what I believe will be a flood of requests and scouring of the National Archives in the near w r e in a mob scene compared to the storming of the Bastille. The American people have waited for over 1 ?4 years to obtain similar information and should not be expected to wait any longer. Justice delayed is justice denied. ...continued on page 34.
Strunk v DoS - Strunk Second Supplement Declaration With Exhibits - DCD 08 Cv 2234 - 8/25/10