Monday, November 29, 2010
Supreme Court Denies Kerchner v Obama Petition; Justices Continue Evading Obama's Eligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief.
Obama Release Your Records on 7:24 AM |
[UPDATES BELOW INCLUDING STATEMENT FROM COMMANDER KERCHNER]
Supreme Court Denies Kerchner v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi Petition for a Writ of Certiorari; Justices Continue Evading Obama's Eligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief...
Via the SCOTUS Order List for 11/29/10: 10-446 - KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Check back later for any updates and or news regarding this expected but disgracful decision by the SCOTUS. Justice Thomas stuck by his words! The ball is clearly in the new Congresses court! Time to put full pressure on them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
UPDATES: DrKatesView; Supreme Court COWARDS, more here. - CNN reports on the Kerchner case nearly two years after it was first filed, shameful commies; Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship, more here. The Conservative Monster; Supreme Court Denies Kerchner vs Obama. - Uses WikiLeaks Drama as The Perfect Distraction, more here. The Birthers.org; The Supreme Court failed to uphold the Constitution - Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, more here. World Net Daily; Supremes punt on Obama eligibility again - Lawyer: decision 'doesn't mean that this issue goes away', more here.
Comment from lead Plaintiff Commander Charles Kerchner; The "Roberts Court" of the U.S. Supreme Court imo will be known in history as the Neville Chamberlain supreme court, the great Obama appeaser court.
Appeasement due to fear that some immediate small amount of veiled and threatened violence from the far left Saul Alinsky goons and tyrants and bullies and thus not doing the right thing early only to support the rule of law and the Constitution ultimately leads to be much bigger problem later. History has shown us that over and over. This matter should have been addressed by the media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries. It wasn't. Congress should have addressed this when asked and when constitutionally it was required to. It didn't. The courts should have addressed the merits of the questions when appealed to early on. They didn't. Everyone in our system of government chose appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else. Now it is far worse. The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law. Our Constitutional Republic and legal system is now compromised and broken. And it will only get worse as our legal system and constitutional republic further deteriorates and the rule of law gives way more and more to appeasement of bullies such as Obama and his far left cronies and puppet masters. Appeasement of the constitutional usurpers will not make it go away. It will only delay the inevitable and fester and in the end be a far worse situation to deal with when the real nature of the tyrant reveals himself in a bolder way and takes away all our liberties. Neville Chamberlain tactics never work with bullies, tyrants, and national socialists.
The U.S. Supreme Court orders were posted at 10:00 a.m. on 29 Nov 2010. Certiorari for our case was denied. The two justices appointed by Obama who had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have! Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36. The two justices and the court ignored that. There were recusals declared by these two Obama appointees in many other petitions including the one immediately before our petition in the orders list and the one immediately after. Imo, apparently the court needed all nine justices in the room to kill the petition. With the full court of 9 justices it's the rule/vote of 4 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. With two recusals that would have left only 7 justices and it's then the rule/vote of 3 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS were that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 ... financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices.
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama et al
The full SCOTUS Order List and Petition embedded below. Previous reports on Kerchner v Obama can be found here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al - Supreme Court Order List Page 15 - 11/29/10
Kerchner v Obama/Congress/Pelosi - Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court - 9/30...
Kerchner v Obama/Congress/Pelosi - Amicus Curiae Brief Filed by the Western Center for Journalism to Suppor...
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-08 pg 5