UPDATE BELOW VIDEO: The Brits say the "birther" protesters voices are getting louder! But we are also racist according to Sky News and Jimmy Carter.
Sky News(2/27/10) - 'Obama 'Birther' Row Rears Its Head Again' - The so-called 'birthers' movement, which questions whether Barack Obama was born in the US and is therefore a legitimate president, has cropped up on the campaign.
The White House has consistently dismissed the issue. Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama's birth because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state's archives... ...Full Sky News print report HERE.
Sky News should have reported this; Hawaii officials stated in a press conference they have personally seen Obama's original vital recordS. ...plural. Obama has more than one vital record on file. That can happen when you amend your BC, get adopted or even apply for the Hawaii Act-96 program.
In simple terms; what Obama has on file, in Hawaii, is an Act-96 application along with adoption records and or amendment(s) to records. He does not have a long-form Certificate of live birth, like you or I would have. If he did have one it would have been released by now.
Here is some background and research regarding the actions of some of the Hawaii officials.
Also, to this day, Hawaii DOH officials refuse to verify any of the 3 different Obama COLB's posted online by Obama's campaign. Much more on that HERE.
The Obama File has a great post regarding the Sky News report titled; - 'Sky News' Dissembler and Propagandist' - As you folks know, I have spent the last two years researching the life and times of the ObamaMessiah, and today I just learned something new. Barack Obama's birth certificate was destroyed in a fire.
In an article, entitled, "Obama 'Birther' Row Rears Its Head Again," Greg Milam, identified as a "U. S correspondent" for Sky News, the British version of Fox News, has just introduced a whole new reason for Obama not presenting his birth certificate to confirm his eligibility -- it was burned in a fire! -- poor Barack -- everything seems to happen to him. ...much more HERE.
The Right Side of Life has announced a new "News" site. Here is a snippet from the announcement; " I think you’ll love my main headliner article on the news site. Sky News is reporting that the “paper copy” of Obama’s birth was destroyed by fire. Go to News.TheRightSideOfLife.com for my “flashback” quotes that seem to contradict this claim by a major news organization."
Some are in high gear to put an end to the Constitutional Eligibility movement, using Alinsky tactics. And it's not coming from the left.
Here's a snippet from Politico;(2/27/10)'Conservatives target their own fringe' - After months of struggling to harness the energy of newly engaged tea party activists, the conservative establishment — with critical midterm congressional elections on the horizon — is taking aim for the first time at the movement’s extremist elements.
“I don’t believe we should be giving [extremists] a platform or empowering them to do anything based off their conspiracy theories,” said Ned Ryun, president of American Majority... More labeling & disinformation HERE.
Here's a snippet from the Washington Post;(2/19/10)' A primer on political reality' - But the birthers and Birchers, militias and nativists, racists and conspiracy theorists do exist. Some, having waited decades in deserved obscurity, hope to ride a populist movement like remoras. But there are others, new to political engagement, who have found paranoia and anger intoxicating. They watch Glenn Beck rail against the omnipresent threat of Saul Alinsky, read Ayn Rand's elevation of egotism and contempt for the weak, listen to Ron Paul attacking the Federal Reserve cabal, and suddenly their resentments become ordered into a theory. Such theories, in politics, can act like a drug, causing addiction, euphoria and psychedelic departures from reality."... [That would make Hitler proud! The rest of that garbage can be viewed HERE.
Snippets from Ned Ryun, president of American Majority;(2/12/10)'On Birfers and Truthers,' - "I see that Erick Erickson of RedState has made it clear that RedState is not the place for birfers or truthers. Neither is American Majority. I second Erick’s comments that birfers and truthers have no place among us, nor do they have a place in the tea party movement... ...more HERE.
(2/15/10)'On Birfers and Truthers, Part II' - "I’m taking this week to make it clear that American Majority does not encourage birfers or truthers, nor are they welcome at American Majority...
...So the birfers and truthers can take their little conspiracies and start their own little organizations and movements and see how far it gets them. Which will be nowhere."... ...rest HERE.
Snippets from Erick Erickson of RedState; (2/12/10)'Vigilance: I’m Banning Birfers, Truthers, and Groups Affiliated Therewith' - "Today I want to reaffirm and make it more definitive. If you think 9/11 was an inside job or you really want to debate whether or not Barack Obama is an American citizen eligible to be President, RedState is not a place for you... ...Birfers and Truthers are not welcome here. Period. End of Story." [then he continues on HERE even though he says End of Story. He ends with this; "Birfers and Truthers have no place among us. And they are most decidedly not welcome at RedState."...
You should really pay attention and see what happens when you attack and ridicule your own supporters.
Glenn Beck Show ratings chart created by Citizen Wells. View CW's Glenn Beck report HERE.
Ned Ryun, and whoever else, pay attention; I'm not a "truther" nor a "birther" or any other conspiracy theory fringe person. I'm an American and a proud conservative that loves this country and what she stands for. I understand the Jihadi threat we and the world face. To equate the two is asinine and shows the lack of understanding or outright treason on the part of some.
Mr. Ryun & Erick Erickson, who are you to tell others they have no place in the tea party movement? The Tea Party is made up of WE THE PEOPLE, not a small group of political party insiders. And to call it a "judicial coup" also shows the lack of understanding of this issue, the lawsuits, quo warrantos and the Constitution.
It's as simple as this; it is no conspiracy theory that Obama is fighting the release of all his past records, with lawyers paid with our tax dollars. It is no conspiracy theory that Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen.
We know from several SCOTUS rulings that "all children born in the country of parents who were its citizens... " make up the “natural born Citizen” category. The SCOTUS says that there have never been any doubts as to the status of these children. As to children born in the U.S. to parents who were not U.S. citizens at the time of their birth, there have been doubts. In other words, "natural born Citizen" under this formulation requires two generations of U.S. citizens, one generation in the parents and the other in the child himself/herself who also must be born on U.S. soil.
It is important to understand that we are focusing on what is a "natural born Citizen" under Article II which specifies the requirements to be President and not on what a "Citizen" is under the 14th Amendment or under some Congressional Act which does not relate to Article II of our Constitution regarding natural born Citizenship.
Obama, while having his mother's U.S. citizenship generation, is missing that of his father's, for his father was a British subject/citizen at the time of Obama's birth. He therefore cannot be a "natural born Citizen," even if Obama was born in Hawaii.
Unless Obama is 200+ years old he is not Constitutionally Eligible to be POTUS.
This is a Constitutional issue, NOT a conspiracy theory!
FACEBOOK USERS: American Majority Facebook Fan page, is HERE, please leave a comment for Ned Ryun. He asked for Facebook responses to the Politico article at the top of the AM Facebook page. http://www.facebook.com/AmericanMajority
Okubo directs Hawaii DoH staff to release pdf file with scans of a computer printout containing redacted pages from the Birth Index, which would contain the surnames Obama, Soetoro, Dunham and Payne. (They should post them at FightTheSmears)
From the Post & Email: (Feb. 26, 2010) — In response to the public outcry over my last report regarding Okubo’s apparently false response to my request for index data from the Hawaii Birth Index, Miss Janice Okubo has directed staff at the Hawaii Department of Health to release a pdf file containing what appears to be scans of a computer printout containing redacted pages from the Hawaii Birth Index for those sections, which would contain the surnames Payne, Dunham, Soetoro and Obama.
In response to the evasive denials of my original UIPA request, and the outright claim I had written what I did not write, Miss Janice Okubo admitted to me last week, that microfiches of the Hawaii Birth Index did exist, and that they did not contain the said surnames. Following my disclosure of that to several friends, I was given a copy of a Treasury Department Document from 1949, showing that at least one individual with the surname Dunham was born in Hawaii, during the period in which the Hawaii Birth Index was used.
As a consequence I wrote Miss Okubo and asked for copies of the microfiche, to prove the veracity of her claim, and offered to pay for them. I also suggested to readers of The Post & Email that they contact Mrs. Lingle, the governor of the State of Hawaii, asking for an outside review of the matter.
Today’s release of a pdf file appears to be the Department of Health’s way of responding to this public outcry, even though the documents do not prove anything, since they are not prima facie evidence of anything, other than that...
...Please note that it is not an unimportant fact that the images released do show that the Birth Index data does contain the names of the parents. In her correspondence with me, Okubo denied that I could ask for the Birth Index information for children based on the surnames of the parents. So if these images are evidentiary in any manner, they are evidentiary of Okubo’s obstruction of my initial UIPA request, since I never asked for the parents’ names, only the names of the children. She has the names of the parents right there; why did she refuse to do a search on that basis?
View the Hawaii Birth Index and read the full P&E report, HERE.
Also, to this day, Hawaii DOH officials still refuse to verify any of the 3 different Obama COLB's posted online by Obama's campaign. Much more on that HERE.
If one were to look at the activity on Capitol Hill during the campaign, there would be no question in their minds that both McCain and Obama were sweating the “natural born citizen” issue.
How do we arrive at that conclusion? We take McCain’s ingrained, glib advice and “Look at the record, my friends“.
Doing just that, we find that back on February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).
Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen” and hence; the entitlement to run for President of the United States. This bill met the same fate that similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past. Attempts such as The Natural Born Citizen Act were known to have failed and the text scrubbed from the internet, with only a shadow-cached copy left, that only the most curious public can find.
Sen. McCaskill, her co-sponsors, fellow colleagues and legal counsel, contend that the Constitution is ambiguous in article II, section 1 and requires clarification. But does it? According to the framers and such drafters as John Bingham, we find the definition to be quite clear:
"I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen" – John Bingham in the United States House on March 9, 1866
From the days of James Madison to the present, the courts have held that the amendment process be justiciable in accordance with its constitutionality and not self-serving or political. But is that what happened here? Again, we must go to the record.
Within only five short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen. Claire McCaskill back again, making another attempt with Senate Resolution 511. On April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a “natural born citizen” in defiance of the Constitution. Curiously, it contained the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Note the names of the sponsor and cosponsors, and note the dates! Even though S.2678 did not get past committee, it served its purpose in the media, especially when Sen. McCaskill pushed through Senate Resolution 511. They hoped to put the public's mind to rest about eligibility for the presidency. After that, these players felt ready to sail ahead into the election without kickback from the public. Or so they thought!
Orly Taitz has this to say about McCain's anti-birther ad;
Snippets via OFI; "Senator McCain owes an apology to me and my clients: 200 members of US military, State Representatives and Ambassador Keyes!
Senator McCain owes me and my clients an apology and an opportunity to discuss this matter with him on the merits on the National TV, as his add was shown all over the National TV and all over the Internet, on a widely watched show, such as Sean Hannity show.
On January 13th , a little over a month ago I got a letter from senator McCain and has written an article about it. In his letter McCain tried to show himself sympathetic to the issue of Obama’s illegitimacy to presidency, but stated that his hands are tied by the issue of separation of powers, in that this issue needs to be decided by the courts without interferance by Congress. Today he released a National re-election campaign add, where he included a clip of my NBC interview and where he is saying that we have more important things to do, then deal with Obama’s illegitimacy to presidency."
...Read Taitz's full response and her letter from McCain, HERE.
Politico provides a bit of smearing on behalf of Obama and McCain...
Snippets; Taitz responded, in a post on her website, attacking McCain, who is being challenged by Hayworth in the GOP primary, for “ignoring the most important issue the country is facing today.”
Taitz called the ad — which she misspelled as “add” throughout the post — “despicable” and “appalling.”
She went on to challenge the four-term senator to a televised debate on the president’s citizenship...
The Post & Email rounds it out with a great headline;
'John McCain Supports Obama’s Election Fraud - CAMPAIGN AD ATTACKS THOSE WHO QUESTION OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY'
Senator John McCain (R-AZ), whose weak-kneed 2008 campaign against Barack Obama could suggest complicity in election fraud, is now openly campaigning for re-election by attacking those who question Obama’s eligibility for office. In a move that entangles McCain more deeply than ever with the tar-baby of Obama’s eligibility, McCain has released a television ad that links his Republican primary opponent, Congressman J. D. Hayworth, with alleged “conspiracy theory” advocates Orly Taitz and Philip Berg...
If you have been unable up until now to wrap your brain around the election fraud that occurred in the 2008 Presidential (Electors) Election in applicable* states like Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia, among others; well, this picture showing how that fraud was carried out in Texas is worth a thousand words.
As you follow this roadmap to fraud, keep in mind: if Barack Obama failed to satisfy the eligibility requirements of office to get election officials to print his name on the ballot in the state of Texas then...
*Applicable states for the purpose of charging election fraud in the 2008 election are those states whose laws only allow the names of qualified candidates to appear on the ballot.
"Anyone in Washington, D.C., who can produce an original copy of a valid U.S. birth certificate should be allowed to stay." - Ann Coulter - 2/24/10 -
The above quote is from, Ann Coulter's, WND Commentary piece on Obama's healthcare summit, titled; What part of 'Party of No' don't you understand?
Snippet; ..."Right now, Americans are hopping mad, swinging a stick and hoping to hit anyone who so much as thinks about nationalizing health care.
If they could, Americans would cut the power to the Capitol, throw everyone out and try to deport them. (Whereas I say: Anyone in Washington, D.C., who can produce an original copy of a valid U.S. birth certificate should be allowed to stay.)
But the Democrats think it's a good strategy to call the Republicans "The Party of No." When it comes to Obamacare, Americans don't want a party of "No," they want a party of "Hell, No!" or, as Rahm Emanuel might say, "*&^%$#@ No!"...
Gary Kreep, of the United States Justice Foundation, released an analysis confirming that if Obama isn't eligible, he could be charged under a number of felony statutes.
And that's just on the federal level; any state charges would be in addition, as would charges against individuals who may have helped him in the commission of any of the acts, according to Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation.
Kreep has been involved in several of the cases that have raised challenges to Obama's occupancy of the Oval Office, including two in California. One is on appeal in the state court system and names California Secretary of State Debra Bowen as defendant. The other, in the federal court system, is on appeal before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Both make claims on behalf of individuals and political candidates in California over Obama's presence on the 2008 election ballot.
WND several weeks ago reported when Kreep's legal research revealed two precedents he believes would be applicable in the Obama case. In one, state officials arbitrarily removed a candidate from an election ballot because it was not proven the candidate was qualified for office. In another, the North Dakota Supreme Court removed the sitting governor from office when it was documented he was not eligible under the state's requirements.
Now Kreep has released an analysis of the federal laws he believes could be applied should Obama ultimately be shown to be ineligible.
"If he is not eligible, he could be charged not only under with these crimes, but potentially with crimes in a number of states where he falsely represented that he was qualified to run, as well as people who helped him," Kreep told WND.
Further, there could be any number of challenges to virtually anything he did as president: his nominations, his executive orders and his signing of legislation.
"This is completely uncharted territory," Kreep told WND. "It could all be challenged as invalid. There has to be a sitting president for [actions] to be valid. If he's not qualified, if he's not the president, it isn't valid."
The research, done on Kreep's behalf by USJF staff attorney Chris Tucker, cited the following statutes that could apply:...
John Brennan is Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and counter terrorism. The tamperer was a contract worker for the company Brennan was the CEO of. A co-conspirator and key witness in the case was found dead, shot in the head, in his car, outside a church, shortly after.
"Back in March 2008, the State Department launched an investigation of improper computer access to passport records of Barack Husssein Obama. The investigation was focusing on one employee — a contract worker with a company headed by an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama...
Arizona House panel approves bill requiring presidential candidates to show birth certificates and prove 'natural born' status.
If Barack Obama wants to run in 2012 he will need to produce proof of both his U.S. birth and citizenship to get on the ballot in Arizona.
AP) — Nearly half of the Arizona Legislature wants to force President Barack Obama to show his birth certificate to state officials if he runs for re-election.
A state House committee on Tuesday approved the measure sponsored by 40 of the state's 90 legislators. It would require presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the requirements to be president...
Arizona Eligibility Bill -- 41 Sponsors -- HB-2441: view HERE.
More States jump onboard; Obama's eligibility becomes war among the states. Lawmakers jump into fray, seek answer to constitutional question. The demand for documentation of Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is surging, with lawmakers in several states now working on legislation that could be used to require future presidential candidates to reveal precisely how they are qualified under the U.S. Constitution's demand for a "natural born citizen."...
UPDATE: Commander Kerchner responds; "McCain was an active part of the usurpation of the Constitution in 2008 and an active part of the cover up since then. I hope this ad does backfire on McCain and fully open to discussion in the media that both candidates from both parties in 2008 were ineligible under Article II of our Constitution."...
via, Washington Independent; John McCain Whacks J.D. Hayworth on Birtherism. And the first use of Orly Taitz in a 2010 campaign video goes to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), facing a stiff challenge from former congressman/radio host J.D. Hayworth. The 78-second web video introduces Taitz and Philip Berg, then Hayworth, and states that “the only difference between these people is that one is running for the U.S. Senate.”
The 78-second web video introduces Taitz and Philip Berg, then Hayworth, and states that “the only difference between these people is that one is running for the U.S. Senate.”...
McCain must have missed this; Arizona House panel approves bill requiring presidential candidates to show birth certificates... via LA Times... and more states HERE.
Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal...
JAMESBURG, NJ – (Feb. 22, 2010) - On January 19, 2010, I filed the Appellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” which is a child born in the country to citizen parents. We maintain that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” because he lacks unity of citizenship and allegiance from birth which is obtained when a child is born in the United States to a mother and father who are both United States citizens at the time of birth. Obama’s father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never even became a resident let alone a citizen. Not being an Article II “natural born Citizen,” Obama is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.
We also maintain that Obama has failed to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii by publicly presenting a copy of a contemporaneous birth certificate, a long-form birth certificate providing the name of the hospital in which he was born and other corroborating data which was generated when he was born in 1961 and not simply a digital image of computer generated Certification of Live Birth [COLB] allegedly obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health in 2007 which some unknown person posted on the internet in 2008, or other contemporaneous and objective documentation. At the bottom of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth (COLB), it states: "This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding." Under the concept of prima facie evidence, the presumption that the fact exists fails when evidence contradicting that fact is presented and in such case the interested party needs to present other competent evidence to prove the existence of that alleged fact. If he fails to do so, the alleged fact is not proven, even if the opposing party produces no further evidence. There exists a considerable amount of evidence which puts serious doubt on Obama’s allegation that he was born in Hawaii. To date, Obama has presented no additional evidence other than the internet image of his Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and two unreliable newspaper announcements regarding where he was born. Hence, the prima facie validity of the Certification of Live Birth (COLB) must fail and Obama should be compelled to produce other objective, credible, and sufficient evidence of where he was born such as a contemporaneous birth certificate from 1961. Having failed to meet his constitutional burden of proof under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, we cannot accept Obama as a “natural born Citizen.”
Circuit Court of Appeals rules provide that an appellant’s opening brief is not to exceed 14,000 words. Because of the extraordinary nature and complexity of the question of whether putative President Barack Obama is an Article II “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible to be President, whether my clients (the plaintiffs) have standing to bring an action against Obama and Congress in which they maintain that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” and that Congress failed to meet its constitutional duty to protect my clients by assuring them that Obama is a “natural born Citizen,” and whether plaintiffs’ action presents a nonjusticiable political question which the courts cannot address, I was compelled to file a brief which contained 20,477 words. So that the Court would accept the overlength brief, I filed a motion with the Court for leave to file the overlength brief.
By order dated February 22, 2010, the Honorable Circuit Judge Michael A. Chagares on behalf of the Motion's Panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file the overlength brief. This is great news because the case will now continue forward as scheduled. Obama’s and Congress’s opposition brief was initially due on February 22, 2010. The Department of Justice obtained a 14-day extension to file that brief, making the new due date March 8, 2010. After they file their opposition brief, I will then have 14 days within which to file a reply to that brief. All briefs will be posted at this blog and it is my hope that the public will read these briefs so as to stay fully informed on this issue that is critically important not only to my clients but also to our Constitutional Republic.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. February 22, 2010 http://puzo1.blogspot.com ####
CONTACT: Mario Apuzzo, Esq. Jamesburg, New Jersey http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ Tel: 732-521-1900 Fax: 732-521-3906 Email: apuzzo@erols.com
There was activity today in the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Appeal before the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA.
The Appellant's Motion for Leave to File an Over-Length Appellant's Brief has been granted by Judge Michael Chagares, Circuit Judge, with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. The Appellant's Brief is now past that technical hurdle and is thus fully accepted and before that court. This case at the Court of Appeals level will be judged by a three judge panel. You can see a copy of the Motion and the Order granting it at the below link.
We say in our original complaint that Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and thus is not eligible to serve as President in the Oval Office. Obama is a Usurper and must be removed to preserve the integrity and fundamental law of our Constitution and our Republic.
We say that we Plaintiffs do have standing and the federal courts do have jurisdiction to address the constitutional legal question as to what does the term "natural born Citizen" in Article II mean to "constitutional standards". All citizens have the inalienable right under the 9th Amendment to stand up to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against usurpation. And Oath Takers such as CDR Kerchner have a duty to do so. The courts have the constitutional power to take and decide this case. It is part of the "judicial review" powers of the federal courts. It is the courts duty to interpret the Constitution and all terms therein for cases involving the U.S. Constitution brought before it.
"We the People" will be heard on this matter! As the People in Massachusetts have demonstrated, "We the People" are the Sovereigns in this country. The Constitution is the fundamental law of our nation, not Obama, Congress, or the two Political Parties, or the Main Stream Media. We will not be silenced. The chair Obama temporarily and illegally sits in in the Oval Office is not his throne. It is the People's seat. And Obama despite all his obfuscations to-date must prove to "constitutional standards" that he is eligible to sit in that seat or he will be removed by the People.
This is not going to go away until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President.
Obama at birth was born British via his non-Citizen, foreign British Subject father. Obama is a dual-citizen. He holds and has held multiple citizenship during his life-time. He's been a Citizenship chameleon all his life as the moment and time in his life suited him. While living in Indonesia during his childhood he was an Indonesian citizen. Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" with singular and sole allegiance to the USA at birth and Unity of Citizenship at Birth to the USA as is required per the Constitution per the intent of our founders and framers of the Constitution and the meaning of the term "natural born Citizen" to Constitutional standards. The requirement to be "natural born Citizen" at birth is a national security issue since the President is the commander of our military. That is why the clause was put into the Constitution in the first place. Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and is an illegal President and Commander-in-Chief and is a national security risk to this nation.
The next expected activity in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit is for the Defendants' to file their Opposition Brief. The Defendants previously had filed for an extension for more time to file their Opposition Brief, which the court had previously granted. As has been typical, the Obama side continues to stall and delay and obfuscate. They absolutely do not wish this case tried in court on the merits as Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and that would be easily proven in a Court of law with discovery and presentation of the historical and legal evidence as to what the term "natural born Citizen" meant to the founders and in four U.S. Supreme Court cases.
In the end the truth will be told. It's only a matter of time and the truth will come out. Obama's hidden and sealed documents of his early live will be revealed, and he will either resign or be constitutionally removed from the office he illegally sits in. Obama has created a Constitutional Crisis of historic proportions. But We the People will resolve it. History will record Putative President Obama as a disgraceful moment in the history of our great Republic and put a gigantic asterisk after his name. But we will survive it. Our Constitution and We the People will win the day and protect our freedom and liberty for our children, grandchildren, and are great-grandchildren to come. Obama the illegal President will be removed.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. Commander USNR (Retired) Lead Plaintiff Kerchner v Obama & Congress http://www.protectourliberty.org ####
Commander Kerchner statement on the new full page color ad in the Washington Times, today 2/15/10.
New AD - "Obama's Constitutional Eligibility Question" - New Policy - it's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" - Washington Times National Weekly - Monday 08 Feb 2015 Issue.
View ad at scribd: http://www.scribd.com/doc/26885850/Citizen-v-natural-born-Citizen-It-s-Don-t-Ask-Don-t-Tell-20100215-Issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-5
We made this one in bigger and bolder type font so it is easier for Obama to read and maybe understand that he is not constitutionally eligible for the office he sits in and he never has been. The 2008 presidential election was a constitutional fraud. Obama should resign or just leave and go live as a civilian somewhere in one of the three or four countries he is a citizen of. New elections should be called within 90 days of his leaving. If he won't leave then Congress and the Courts acting in concert will have to constitutionally remove him as the truth and facts of his multi-citizenship real legal identity is revealed to the American people and the constitutional implications are fully understood by the American people when all his hidden and sealed early live records are exposed to the public and for examination by document experts.
Obama thinks of himself as a Citizen of the World and is working on implementing the "Dreams" from his marxist Kenyan father, a father who was not even an immigrant to the USA let alone never was a citizen of the USA. Obama was born British via his father. He also obtained Indonesian citizenship when his mother remarried an Indonesian and they moved to Indonesia when he was a young child.
Thus, with Obama having citizenship of several countries he's pretty close to being a citizen of the world. But he is definitely NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA to "constitutional standards". The U.S. Constitution in Article II with the "natural born Citizen" clause requires a person eligible for President and Commander-in-Chief of our military to be born with sole allegiance to only the USA at birth with no affinities or citizenships in other countries. Obama was born a British Subject. That disqualifies him from ever being eligible to be President. See this essay for more details: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html
America's founders and framers of the Constitution would be rolling over in their graves if they knew a British Subject is now sitting in the Oval Office as President given they had just fought a long, bitter, and bloody war with Great Britain to free ourselves from British rule. And thus they put that "natural born Citizen" clause in Article II so that once the original generation had past that no British Subject at birth would ever be allowed to become President and Commander of our military. But the Progressive Socialist Movement of the last 100 years in our nation, with their always rewriting history and constantly deceiving the electorate (with a willing and enabling media), once again have deceived the American electorate and got a smooth teleprompter reading, foreign money financed, constitutionally ineligible person elected. But "We the People" are awakening to the deception and see what they have done. Now "We the People" must and will correct this.
The American people are awakening. The truth and the Constitution will win the day in the end and Obama and the 2008 election fraudulent process will be relegated to a disgraceful and historic footnote in the history of our nation. Time reveals all truth.
Charles Kerchner Commander USNR (Retired) Lead Plaintiff Kerchner v Obama & Congress http://puzo1.blogspot.com http://www.protectourliberty.org #####
Obama refuses to address the legal question about his Constitutional Eligibility to be sitting in the Oval Office. He has never conclusively proven to any controlling legal authority that he is a "natural born Citizen" of the USA to "constitutional standards" as is constitutionally required to be eligible for the office of President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.
On January 19, 2010, I filed Appellants' Opening Brief in the appeal of Kerchner et al. v. Obama et al. which is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. In that appeal, we maintain that the New Jersey Federal District Court erred in dismissing our case by ruling that plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge Obama's alleged eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military and that our case presents a non-justiciable political question. In our case, we have provided the Founder’s and Framers’ definition of an Article II “natural born Citizen” which is a child born in the country to citizen parents. We maintain that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” because he lacks unity of citizenship and allegiance from birth which is obtained when a child is born in the United States to a mother and father who are both United States citizens at the time of birth. Obama’s father was only a temporary visitor to the United States when Obama was born and never even became a resident let alone a citizen. Not being an Article II “natural born Citizen,” Obama is not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief.
The defendants had 30 days within which to file their opposition brief. Defendants have requested and obtained from the Court an extension of time to file their brief. The Court has granted them until March 8, 2010 to file it. After that filing, I will then have a chance to file a reply brief within the next 14 days.
You may obtain a copy of my brief at this site . We will be posting here the defendants' opposition brief after it is filed along with my reply brief. I hope that many of you will take the time to read these briefs so that you may learn first hand what the legal issues and arguments are regarding whether the plaintiffs have standing and/or are precluded by the political question doctrine to challenge Obama on his eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief, and what the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen” is.
UPDATE(2/27/10): Hawaii DoH's Janice Okubo responds to demands and releases CRAP! TIME TO RUFFLE MORE FEATHERS! Okubo directs Hawaii DoH staff to release pdf file with scans of a computer printout containing redacted pages from the Birth Index, which would contain the surnames Obama, Soetoro, Dunham and Payne. Full Update HERE. UPDATE: Shout-out to the Hawaii officials…
Thanks for visiting the ORYR blog, 50+ different times since the launch of Operation Hawaii Five-oBAMa on 2/10…
Please don’t try and take the day off on the 17th… We will not relent until the records are released…
Obama’s campaign posted 3 different Hawaiian COLBs on the internet… Stop using privacy excuses!
RELEASE THE RECORDS!
The Hawaii DOH is openly circumventing UIPA Laws that would allow parts or even all of Obama's vital recordS to be released, due to Hawaii public statements on his vital recordS. The pressure is mounting in Hawaii and officials are being moved around like musical chairs.
Hawaii DOH officials, to this day, still refuse to verify any of the 3 different COLB's posted online by Obama's campaign.
It's time to CALL and EMAIL the DOH/GOVT officials in Hawaii and demand they uphold the UIPA Laws and release Obama's vital recordS.
On February 17th, 12pmest-8pmest, we are asking all to bombard the Hawaii Officials listed below. We also ask that you continue to call, the Hawaii Officials, once or twice a week and demand an investigation. It's up to us!
Demand they uphold the UIPA Laws and release Obama's vital recordS.
Hawaii Department of Health Administration Directory 1250 Punchbowl St. Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone (808) 586-4400 Fax (808) 586-4444
Deputy Director, Susan Jackson Phone (808) 586-4412 E-mail: sharon.abe@doh.hawaii.gov
Governor's Office Governor Linda Lingle Phone: 808 586-0034 Fax: 808 586-0006 web contact form: https://cs.ehawaii.gov/gov-ors/ctg-ci.html
Lieutenant Governor, JAMES R."DUKE" AIONA, JR. Phone:(808) 586-0255 Fax: (808) 586-0231 e-mail: ltgov@hawaii.gov
Department of the Attorney General Hawaii AG, Mark Bennett Telephone: (808) 586-1500 Fax: (808) 586-1239 web contact form; http://hawaii.gov/ag/main/contact_dept/main/forms/general_responses
In the mean time, burn up these web contact forms.
Governor Linda Lingle, Click HERE; https://cs.ehawaii.gov/gov-ors/ctg-ci.html
Hawaii AG, Mark Bennett, Click HERE; http://hawaii.gov/ag/main/contact_dept/main/forms/general_responses
Commander Kerchner is lead plaintiff in Kerchner vs Obama/Congress et al... now pending in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals...
FROM THE DESK OF COMMANDER KERCHNER - 07 Feb 2010 -
Dear Fellow Patriots and Supporters of Our Constitution:
We have Obama personally feeling the pressure over his lack of eligibility to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. That is why for the first time he commented "with his own lips" on the issue of his Constitutional eligibility via his statement this past week that people should not question his "citizenship". Clever on his part. But he did not fool me. I see through it. That remark of his is another Obot typical diversion from the real issue and an obfuscation on words and issues on his part because he wants to talk about "citizenship" and not the real issue, "natural born Citizenship" and his lack of "Constitutional Eligibility" to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military.
However, that he addressed the issue at all is a breakthrough. He is now feeling the pressure personally. We must keep the pressure on him. I ask you all to spread the word about my lawsuit now at the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA, "Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al", and to help financially support my publicity and educational campaign which is placing full page ads in the Washington Times National Weekly edition newspaper. Those ads in the print media cannot be scrubbed away by the Obots. That paper is read by all the power players and opinion writers and makers in Washington DC and the whole nation. They are taking notice. You can read many examples of the more than two dozen full page or larger newspaper spreads I've run in that paper at this link with the help of donations from the American people like you: http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/advertorials.htm
I need more and continuing help to further publicize my lawsuit against Obama & Congress. We need to keep the pressure on. Please donate whatever you can to the cause at this online site or follow the instructions there of where to send a check: http://www.protectourliberty.org/
To learn more details about my lawsuit in summary and in detail see these links:
Also, to read excellent essays on Article II constitutional eligibility issues, and proof via previous Supreme Court decisions that Obama is not eligible, read the essays in my attorney, Mario Apuzzo, Esq.'s, blog. Here is one link for a sample: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html
Attorney Apuzzo is an experienced citizenship attorney with over 25 years of legal practice in the federal courts. He is a constitutional expert on Article II and original meaning and intent of the eligibility clause therein. Here is the link to his blog: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
I need your help. All patriots need to stand now and help the cause. The truth and the Constitution will win the day in the end.
Synergy at work! If we all do a little and donate a little, together we can accomplish a lot!
The New WH Cyber/Phone Blitz Day Date is now set for February 19th, 2010.
Operation Release III - Help us Demand Obama release his records. This Event will also be ongoing. Contact the White House with your demands every Monday Wednesday or Friday, or everyday for that matter. It's up to you. It doesn't take long to make one or two phone calls and one or two wall posts a week. We must keep the pressure on him.
Pick up the phone and also join us at the White House FB Fan page and post your choice of message, which are posted at the ORYR Event page, or post any of your own, demanding the truth, and nothing but the truth, from Barack Obama!