UPDATE(4/1): Ed Hale is a Big Fraud! A slap in the face. -- Obama's Birth Certificate Will(not)Be Released To The Public!

UPDATE: Ed Hale seems to think this a joking matter! ED HALE IS A FRAUD!(see comment thread) I've seen this floating around the internet for sometime. Ed Hale from Plains Radio Network says he has obtained Obama's vault birth certificate from Hawaii. Mr Hale reported on his radio show that the birth certificate will be released on 4/1/10 at 8:00 PM Central time. If what Ed is reporting below is true, then this is expolsive!

Snippets via Plains Radio Network; LIES: "Tonight I will release Obama Birth Certificate that was in the vault in the State of Hawaii. This is his original BC that the director stood up and said " I have seen his BC and he is a NBC". Well now I am about to prove that woman lie to America with the same document that she claims he was a NBC with...

...this is how I got it: I have a friend in Hawaii who contacted me in Feb and ask if I would be interested in the Obama long form BC. I said yes but under certain conditions. It must be proven to be legit. They agreed and sent me the BC. I had 3 major Colleges test this document. All test prove that this is the real deal.

How this document was removed from the State of Hawaii vault? A supervisor retired a few months back, on their last day on the job, about 15 minutes before closing time, they walk into the vault, folded it up and then stuck it in their shirt and walked out with it. The reason that did this was because the director had lied to the American people about Obama place of birth and he was a NBC. They wanted to set the record straight. Now we have the document with the supporting document from these colleges that proves beyond any doubt that this is real and it is legit..."

UPDATE: LIES; Ed Hale reported tonight(3/31/10) that a sitting U.S. Congressman was at his home this morning to view the document. The Congressman is now in possession of the document and was headed to Washington D.C. with the document.

Ed Hale then reports that the Congressman contacted him this evening and said he showed the Republican leadership the document and they all agree the document is legit.

The Congressman also told Ed Hale that he and the others involved will have immunity from criminal prosecution due to the criminal nature of obtaining the birth certificate. Ed reports the Congressman promised to have Obama removed.

Ed Hale says the Congressman will be on his radio show tonight(4/1) to reveal himself and the birth certificate. Ed reported that Fox News called him yesterday and offered him a million dollars for the birth certificate... Fox News wanted full control of the document and it's release... He turned Fox News down...

Again; ED HALE IS A BIG FRAUD!

High-Ranking Military Officer Under 4 Star General George Casey Wants Truth About Obama’s Eligibility to be POTUS. Got Records!?

LTC LAKIN UPDATE: 10/16/10; Click here. -

UPDATE(s) BELOW:Via Steve at GiveUsLiberty; The officer questioning Obama's status is Lt Col T. Lakin, Flight Surgeon. He is on the staff of 4 star General Geo. W. Casey, the Army's Chief of Staff. I believe that is the second highest job in the U.S. Army. Gen. Casey is stationed at the Pentagon in Washington D.C. For a Pentagon Officer such as Lakin, on the staff of such a prestigious General as Gen Casey, to speak out against Obama is quite remarkable.

It's akin to treason within the highest echelons of the Palace Guard.

Perhaps this act which occurred today was the reason for Obama's earlier message this morning, about not questioning his eligibility. Obama must have heard it was coming and is trying to do damage control. It also explains Fox's Gretta Van Sustrand doing a piece with Newt Gingrich, in which she called the birther's
space cadets.

Well add one more, a highly decorated Pentagon staff officer in top standing with the Army, who happens to be a very skilled Doctor. How do I know this? They don't let dum dums handle gold plated 4 star Generals, second in line for overall command of the Army.

Welcome Aboard the Space Ship Doctor, glad to have a Flight Surgeon with us. BTW we refer to ourselves Constitutionalists, it's derived from the document we revere and cherish.

via Steve at GiveUsLiberty ...Full report below video...



Army Officer Seeks Truth About Obama’s Eligibility to Serve in Oval Office, Invites Own Court-Martial

March 30th, 2010

In a news release today, Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin said he is willing to risk a court-martial in order if that’s what it takes to determine whether or not President Barack Obama is eligible to serve as president of the United States. Not your average officer, Colonel Lakin is the lead flight surgeon charged with caring for Army Chief of Staff General George W. Casey’s pilots and air crew.

The video above provides an overview of his argument.

“I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president’s eligibility under the constitution to hold office”, said Colonel Lakin.

The news release cited (1) Article II, Sec. 1 of the U. S. Constitution which explicitly provides that only “natural born” citizens can serve as president and commander-in-chief and (2) Mr. Obama’s continued refusal to release his original 1961 birth certificate as reasons behind Colonel Lakin reaching the conclusion that his orders are unlawful, and thus MUST be disobeyed.

Today, according to the news release, Colonel Lakin said he had informed his superiors that he cannot understand how his oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” does not permit him, as a military officer, to pursue proof of eligibility from his commander-in-chief. In addition, he noted that his efforts have been rebuffed with legal evasions.

Given the Obama Administration’s “transparency” initiative, the colonel believes many U.S. citizens are also demanding release of the original birth certificate.

Colonel Lakin’s numerous awards and decorations include the Army Flight Surgeon’s Badge, Combat Medical Badge, the Bronze Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with three Oak Leaf Clusters, the Army Achievement Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters, the National Defense Service Medal with Bronze Service Star, the Armed Forced Expedition Medal, the Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon and the NATO service medal. Source. SafeguardOurConstitution.Com

Barack Obama's comments on the Today Show HERE.

UPDATE(S): Exclusive: Highly Decorated Army Surgeon Refuses All Military Orders Until Obama Proves He Is a Natural Born Citizen. more at FamilySecurityMatters.Org

BREAKING(4/13/10): Lt. Col. Lakin's Pentagon Access Pass Revoked, Computer Seized, Obama is REFUSING to Provide Proof He is Constitutionally Eligible... ...more here.

Obama Says Tea Party is Full of Birthers. Obama, Release ALL Your Records!

On the Today Show with Matt Liar, Obama says the tea party movement is based on those who doubt his eligibility to be President.

Via YahooNews; Obama: Tea Party features 'core group' against him

pResident Barack Obama says he believes the Tea Party is built around a "core group" of people who question whether he is a U.S. citizen and believe he is a socialist.

But beyond that, Obama tells NBC he recognizes the movement involves "folks who have legitimate concerns" about the national debt and whether the government is taking on too many difficult issues simultaneously.

In an interview broadcast Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show, Obama said he feels "there's still going to be a group at their core that question my legitimacy." But he said he didn't want to paint Tea Party activists "in broad brushes" and he hopes to win over members who have "mainstream, legitimate concerns." Source.

Via Politico; Obama dissects demonstrations

Obama describes tea party movement as "loose amalgam of forces," some of whom are "legitimately concerned about the deficit" ... President Obama describes the tea party movement as a "loose amalgam of forces," some of whom are "legitimately concerned about the deficit" and some of whom doubt his "legitimacy" as president.

"There's a part of the tea party movement that actually did exist before I was elected," he said in an interview aired Tuesday on NBC's "Today" show. "There's some folks who just weren't sure whether I was born in the United States, whether I was a socialist. So there's that segment of it, which I think is just dug in ideologically."

"Then," he continued, "I think that there's a broader circle around that core group of people, who are legitimately concerned about the deficit, who are legitimately concerned that the federal government may be taking on too much."

Obama suggested he might be able to sway that faction of tea party sympathizers by tackling federal spending, but conceded: "There's still going to be a group at their core that question my legitimacy or question the Democratic Party generally or question people they consider to be against them in some way, and that group we're probably not going to convince." Source.

Via WND; Obama: Tea party based on eligibility issue
'There are some folks who just weren't sure whether I was born in the U.S.'

President Obama says the tea party movement is based on those who doubt his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

Asked in an interview on the Today Show about the tea party opposition to his plans in Washington, Obama said, "I think that it is still a loose amalgam of forces. There is a part of the tea party movement that actually did exist before I was elected. We saw some of it leading up to my election.

"There are some folks who just aren't sure I was born in the United States, whether I was a socialist," he said.

"That's segment of it which I think is just dug in ideologically. That strain has existed in American politics for a long time," he said.

He said around that "core" in the tea party is a circle of people "who are concerned about the deficit, who are legitimately concerned that the federal government may be taking on too much."

He said the "emergency measures" he took over the last year to give taxpayer money to banking institutions and automobile companies "fed that sense that things are out of control."

"These are folks who have legitimate concerns," he said.

Earlier in the interview broadcast today, he said opposition to his plans – such as the recent nationalization of health care – is natural because the party out of power, "their base ends up being very agitated."

"It may take the next election or the next presidential election before things settle down," he warned.

Obama's actual response to those who question his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement that the U.S. president be a "natural born citizen" has been to dispatch both private and tax-funded attorneys to prevent anyone from gaining access to his documentation.

Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

WND has reported on a multitude of cases that have been brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the office.

The issue has prompted a number of state legislatures to work on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.

The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.

The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment. Source.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

If you missed it, send a letter to Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Demand that Obama release ALL the records he fights to keep sealed with lawyers paid with our tax dollars.


Visit http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com/ for more details.

Citizen v natural born Citizen-It's Don't Ask Don't Tell-20100301 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Orly Taitz Files Motion to Have her Quo Warranto Lawsuit Consolidated with Multi-State Health Care Bill Lawsuit

Attorney Orly Taitz files motion to have her Quo Warranto lawsuit consolidated with the 13 State health care lawsuit in the District of Columbia.

Orly Taitz is arguing the health care bill(law) is unconstitutional because Obama was not constitutionally eligible to sign it.

Below is the motion filed by Orly Taitz.

Previous reports on Orly's case(s) can be viewed HERE.



TAITZ v OBAMA (QW) - 17 - First MOTION to Consolidate Cases by ORLY TAITZ - gov.uscourts.dcd.140567.17.0

Keyes v Obama Reply Brief Filed in 3rd Appellate District Court of Appeal, Gary Kreep Will File Quo Warranto Against Obama in DC

On behalf of the honorable Alan Keyes, Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, filed the reply brief in the Keyes v Obama appeal now before the 3rd Appellate District Court of Appeal.

Gary Kreep reports he will be filing a Writ of Quo Warranto against Obama.

Below the report is an interview with Gary Kreep on Floyd Reports. Kreep talks about his case, the quo warranto, and other legal actions.

Via World Net Daily; California 'had duty' to examine Obama eligibility. Keyes' brief cites Supreme Court determination candidates can be removed from ballot.

By Bob Unruh - A brief submitted to an appeals court in California explains that elections officials in California had a duty to examine Barack Obama's eligibility to the office of president during the 2008 election.

WND previously has reported on the case brought by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and others.

He has argued that a judge's earlier dismissal of the case ignored significant precedents, that state officials previously removed from the ballot a nominee for president simply because he did not meet constitutional eligibility requirements and in another situation, a court actually removed a government's chief elected executive from office for not being eligible.

A multitude of cases have been brought over the issue of Obama's eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama's father was a subject of the British crown at Obama's birth – from being eligible for the presidency.

The disputes revolve around the Constitution's demand that the president be a "natural born citizen."

In his reply brief to Obama's arguments the case should be dismissed, Kreep argues that even though Obama's attorneys argue that "jurisdiction over presidential qualifications lies with the United States Congress," that actually is not a full explanation.

He cites the U.S. Constitution that "each state" shall appoint a number of electors, and "this case concerns itself primarily with California state election law and the compliance or non-compliance by the secretary of state in fulfilling her ministerial duties as chief elections officer of California."

"This is not a political question, but is, rather, a question well within the jurisdiction of this court to determine, as it is a duty that may be compelled by this court's equitable power," he wrote.

"A remedy is proper at state level where a duty is imposed on a state officer. The underlying writ does not require anything of any federal official, but does require Respondent [Debra] BOWEN, the California Secretary of State, to fulfill a specific duty to verify that a candidate meets the eligibility requirements for the office that the candidate is seeking. This is a matter of first impression, and RESPONDENT'S correctly assert that there is not yet any statutory or judicial rule which requires this duty of the Secretary of State. However, it is a duty that is reasonably inferred from the already existing duties of said office," he argues.

Kreep's earlier appeal documentation had explained the precedents that he believes should be applied.

"In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for president of the United States. The then-Secretary of State, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for president," the brief, being filed this week, argues.

"Using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver, unsuccessfully, challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States, which affirmed the actions."

Also, the governor of North Dakota was removed from office after the state Supreme Court determined he did not meet the state constitution's eligibility requirements.

The arguments have been submitted to the 3rd Appellate District Court of Appeal in California in the case that was brought in state court on behalf of Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake as well as California elector Markham Robinson.

It alleges Obama was not eligible for the office and Bowen failed to investigate his qualifications before allowing his name on the 2008 presidential election ballot.

This case is separate from another case brought on behalf of some of the same plaintiffs in federal court over similar concerns. That case, dismissed last year by U.S. District Judge David Carter, is on appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Kreep alleges the dismissal of the state case by Judge Michael Kenny was in error because the defendants "failed to establish that there was no triable cause of action on the critical constitutional issues of whether Obama has met the eligibility requirements to serve as president of the United States and whether Bowen has the duty, as chief elections officer of the state of California, to verify the eligibility of candidates for federal office running in the state of California."

The president's lawyers in many of the cases have said, and judges have agreed so far, that the courts simply don't have jurisdiction over a question of eligibility because of the Constitution's provision that president's must be removed by impeachment, which rests with Congress.

In one case, the president's lawyers prominently argued, "The Constitution's commitment to the Electoral College of the responsibility to select the president includes the authority to decide whether a presidential candidate is qualified for office.

"The examination of a candidate's qualifications is an integral component of the electors' decision-making process. The Constitution also provides that, after the Electoral College has voted, further review of a presidential candidate's eligibility for office, to the extent such review is required, rests with Congress," the president's lawyers argued.

But the issue, however, already has been adjudicated by courts, and the resolution is that courts do have the authority to review eligibility and even remove an ineligible chief executive, the appeal brief cites.

"Even though Obama was elected to this office, this ineligibility constitutes a legal disability for the office of president of the United States," the brief states. "In 'State ex rel. Sathre v. Moodie,' after Thomas H. Moodie was duly elected to the office of governor of the state of North Dakota, it was discovered that Thomas H. Moodie was not eligible for the position of governor, as he had not resided in the state for a requisite five years before running for office, and, because of that ineligibility, he was removed from office and replaced by the lieutenant governor," the brief explains.

North Dakota's historical archives, in fact, document the case.

The Democrat was nominated by his party for governor in 1934 and beat his Republican opponent, Lydia Langer.

"As soon as the election was over, there was talk of impeachment, but no charges were filed," the state's archives report. "After Moodie's inauguration on January 7, 1935, it was revealed that he had voted in a 1932 municipal election in Minnesota. In order to be eligible for governor, an individual has to have lived in the state for five consecutive years before the election. The State Supreme Court determined that Governor Moodie was ineligible to serve, and he was removed from office on February 16, 1935," the state reports.

"We're seeking to bar anyone from going on the presidential ballot in 2012 unless they can prove that they're eligible," Kreep told WND.

"Appellants contend that Bowen has a duty to ensure that all candidates in the state of California, for both federal and state offices, meet the eligibility requirements for the offices sought, that Bowen did not fulfill said duty, and that a court determination is needed to ensure that the California secretary of state comply with this duty in the future," the brief said.

The original case sought to prevent Bowen from certifying California's electors for the Electoral College vote; it later was amended to correct the deficiencies it identified in future elections.

It explains the appellants have standing in the case because court precedent states "a candidate or his political party has standing to challenge the inclusion of an allegedly ineligible rival … on the theory that doing so hurts the candidate's or party's own chances of prevailing."

"Keyes … and Drake … have been injured because they did not have fair competition for the office," the pleading states.

Further, courts can address the problem.

While the dispute has "significant political overtones," it is, nonetheless, "an issue which the court can make a determination on, because the requirements are clearly stated in Article II, Section 1, Clause 4, of the U.S. Constitution and courts routinely decide questions of law and of fact such as the issue in this case."

"A provision of the Constitution may not be disregarded by means of a popular vote of the people, as there are specific guidelines for amending the Constitution of the United States," it continues.

"Respondents denied that this Cleaver case had any relevance to the underlying issue … Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party listed Mr. Larry Holmes as an eligible candidate in the presidential primary. When the then SOS checked his eligibility, it was found that Mr. Holmes was, similarly, not eligible, and Mr. Holmes was removed from the ballot… It this case, we have a similar situation in that the Democratic Party submitted the name of Obama as a candidate for president," the brief argues. ...more HERE.

The Obama Eligibility issue begins about ten minutes into the video. Previous reports on Gary Kreep can be viewed HERE.

Nevada Gov Candidate Demands Governor Gibbons Investigate & File Quo Warranto Against Obama. Tea Party Leaders Making Huge Mistake! Got Leadership!?

This is what needs to happen in every state of our Nation. Nevada gubernatorial candidate, decorated Navy veteran, Gino DiSimone, demands Governor Gibbons immediately take action and investigate Obama's CONSTITUTIONAL eligibility & file a Writ of Quo Warranto against Obama(I implore ALL concerned Americans to do the same, contact yours HERE). More on this in a minute...

Some in the Tea Party Leadership are making a huge mistake by dismissing the very people they claim to lead. The longer they continue to ignore(cover up, in my view) Obama's Constitutional Eligibility to be POTUS, the more time Obama will have to destroy what is left of our Constitution. Are you waiting for after they RAhM Amnesty through? Y'all better WAKE UP!

The Tea Party leaders in Searchlight Nevada had no problem letting Ann Coulter get on stage and discredit the people that just want TRANSPARENCY. Yet, they didn't allow the candidate for Nevada Governor speak. Why!? The answer is because Mr. DiSimone is very outspoken about Obama's constitutional eligibility to be POTUS. You will see that once you read the demand letter he sent to Nevada Governor Gibbons.

Via the Post & Email; - Demand issued to Nevada Governor for proof of Obama’s Eligibility - GINO DISIMONE, INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR NEVADA GOVERNOR, DEMANDS THAT GOVERNOR JIM GIBBONS “IMMEDIATELY TAKE ACTION” TO DETERMINE OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT

by Sharon Rondeau(Mar. 28, 2010) — The following letter has been sent to Governor Jim Gibbons of Nevada and submitted to The Post & Email for publication unedited:

Dear Governor Gibbons:

I adjure you, nay, I require you, as the duly elected Governor of my State exercising the duty of Commander in Chief of Nevada, to immediately take action to protect my freedom, liberty, property and wealth, as your duty utterly requires. To this end I require you file a legal challenge, Quo Warranto (D.C. Statute 35 §16-3501), on the authority of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, a/k/a BARRY SOETORO requiring proof that he is eligible to be President of the United States of America, and he has the constitutional authority to act as President of the United States and to execute the Health Care Bill. This Bill is a direct threat to my freedom, liberty, wealth and property. It threatens nearly every citizen of Nevada and nearly every business of Nevada as it will forcefully extract, under duress, my/our wealth and property. This is an acute direct security threat and I require swift aggressive intervention for assurances of security from my Commander in Chief of this great State of Nevada.

By virtue of this acute security threat to me and Nevada citizenry and businesses, as Commander in Chief, it is your solemn sworn duty to protect me/us from acute security threats, particularly threats to my freedoms, liberties, health, wealth and property. To this end I demand you exercise your sworn duty to protect us with expediency as follows:...

The full unedited letter is at the Post & Email HERE. It's a must read!

Could someone please send Ann Coulter this link HERE; http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html ...for a lawyer, she is not so bright on the law or the constitution.

This is what we need in this Country to stop this Marxist takeover... http://CommieBlaster.com/velvet-revolution/index.html

If you missed it, send a letter to Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Demand that Obama release ALL the records he fights to keep sealed with lawyers paid with our tax dollars.


Visit http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com/ for more details.

THE TWELVE COUNTS of Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations perpetrated in the 2008 election. Got Fraud!?

Via Commander Kerchner; Here is a new web page displaying THE TWELVE COUNTS of Constitutional and Civil Rights Violations perpetrated in the 2008 election which are charged against Obama and the U.S. Congress in the Kerchner et al vs. Obama & Congress et al lawsuit. The lawsuit is now before the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. Read these counts and you will see clearly how Obama and the U.S. Congress flouted the U.S. Constitution and their duty to provide a responsive representative republican form of government which is promised and guaranteed by our Constitution. Obama and Congress continue to trample on the U.S. Constitution and are not listening to and responding to overwhelmingly expressed voice of We the People. They are hiding from and avoiding the People. They are acting like King George and his puppet Parliament of 1775. These usurpers of power not granted to them in the U.S. Constitution must be stopped!

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/twelvecounts.pdf

All those responsible must be removed. And 'We the People' will exactly that for many now in Congress via the November elections. But there is another, quicker, stronger way to restore the balance of power to "We the People" and the "several states" as our national government was originally designed to be by the founders and framers. Article 5 of our U.S. Constitution gives "We the People" absolute authority, acting through our several states, the power to overrule the Congress and even the Courts. It is time for the states to use that sovereign power, because We the People are the sovereigns in this nation, and call for a Constitutional Convention for starters to pass an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to ban nationalized health care, ... and also to consider such other amendments to put the arrogant Congress, the illegal President, and the cowardly Courts in their place and restore the balance of power in our Constitutional Republic.

Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://www.protectourliberty.org
####

Obamacare and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

Via Mario Apuzzo, esq.; Obamacare and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

Some might wonder what does health care and the “natural born Citizen” clause have to do with each other. The answer is the survival of our Constitution and Republic by stopping the usurpation of government power.

In the context of speaking about slavery that existed during the Founding era, Obama told us that the Constitution is an “imperfect document.” It has now become apparent that the flaw that Obama sees with our governing document is much more fundamental and goes well beyond what he said related to the early slave experience. For Obama, that flaw is that the Constitution is obligatory, is a strong check on government power, and cannot be changed by just one person.

We have seen Obama brazenly ignore the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the highest and most powerful office in the land, the Office of the President and Commander in Chief of the Military. We have seen how Obama has the audacity to be President and Commander without honoring and respecting the Constitution by showing that he is at least born in Hawaii as he claims and satisfying the definition of a “natural born Citizen” as originally intended by the Framers and Founders. That is a violation of the document he swore twice to “preserve, protect and defend.”

Such conduct by Obama lead many to ask if Obama does not respect and defend the Constitution and so publicly defies it once, what will stop him from doing the same a second and third time. These Americans were right in expressing such concern, for now we have Obamacare which is just another example of Obama flouting and ignoring the Constitution.

Now he wants to force upon the nation a health care system under the guise that the Federal Government can do so because that system does nothing more than regulate interstate commerce. Additionally, he wants to accomplish his plan without even adhering to legitimate legislative process. How he can honestly believe that a person who does not buy a good or service (such as health insurance) or who the government compels to do so under the threat of a camouflaged income tax is engaged in interstate commerce or gives the government the right to interfere in such personal decisions based on some other constitutional provision defies reason and common sense. Treating people’s refusal to buy health insurance as interstate commerce or triggering some other constitutional governmental power would in effect give Congress unlimited authority to control every aspect of people’s lives. When something defies logic, we have to ask ourselves what is the real motive involved. Upon close circumspection we can see that Obama’s health care plan is nothing more than the government taking more money from productive members of society and giving it to those who need money but do not have it for various reasons, with the central government in the process usurping great powers and control over the people’s lives including but not limited to violating their privacy rights over their own bodies, their medical and financial privacy, their right to decide how much medical care one needs, their right to free speech and association, their right to exercise their religion, doctors’ right to earn a living as they see fit, their right not to be illegally taxed, and their right to make end-of-life decisions. This is nothing but Obama and his Congress declaring a socialist revolution upon the American people and attempting to sneak that revolution right by them by dressing the wolf in sheep’s clothing.

There exists proof in the form of Obama’s own words that his health insurance plan is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth which the government has no power to do under our Constitution. Obama made some appearances as a guest on Odyssey, a talk show at Chicago Public Radio. Obama, then a State Senator and Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, was on the program 3 times between 1998 and 2002. Here is an excerpt from the call-in segment for the Slavery and the Constitution show that aired in September of 2001. Here is the transcript from 2001 as posted at Free Republic at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2116060/posts:

“MODERATOR: Good morning and welcome to Odyssey on WBEZ Chicago 91.5 FM and we’re joined by Barack Obama who is Illinois State Senator from the 13th district and senior lecturer in the law school at the University of Chicago.

“OBAMA: If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.

“But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that.”

Indeed, there we have it in Obama’s own words. There is little doubt that Obamacare is nothing more than Obama’s means of achieving what he perceives to be “political and economic justice in this society” by using “redistribution of wealth.” He even concedes that redistribution of wealth is a “radical” idea. He admits that the Warren court could not achieve such “political and economic justice” because it could not break free from the “essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution.” And here is the real flaw that Obama sees with the Constitution: “it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.”

We can see that Obama does not accept that the Tenth Amendment says that whatever powers the Constitution does not give to the federal government or prohibit to the States is reserved to the States or the people. What is it that Obama wants the government to do “on your behalf?” One can only wonder why Obama believes that a government must do some unspecified thing for people. Is it love of power and control over people that compels him to harbor such ideas? We can see that Obama realizes that my right to sit at the lunch counter is freedom “as long as I could pay for it.” Hence, comes his plan to redistribute wealth. Obama admits that such radical change has not yet been accomplished through the courts. He also does not accept the “essential constraints” the Founders and Framers wrote into the Constitution. Hence, he offers a plan on how to get around those limitations. He tells us that such radical change must be accomplished through “political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change.” So there you have it very loud and clear. Obama admits that the Constitution does not allow him to engage in any such “redistribution of wealth” and that the Courts have never gone as far to permit it. But his plan is to accomplish it by changing the political structure of America which would give him the power to accomplish what is currently unconstitutional. Obama’s fear of the courts is evidenced from provisions that provide that no company can sue the government for price fixing and there will be no judicial review of government monopoly of health care. Of course, Obama’s plan necessarily includes also changing the current make-up of our courts. Maybe this is the “change” that he had in mind when he said that if he won the Presidency he was going to “change” America.

Obama has totally ignored the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the highest and most powerful office in the land, the President and Commander in Chief of the Military. The problem with that violation is that we have a person sitting in the President’s and Commander’s seat who is not eligible to be there. Practically speaking, that is a grave national security matter that puts America at risk not only from attack from enemies both foreign and domestic but as we can see also threatens America’s basic political institutions and freedoms. I believe it is a fair question to ask whether we would have an attack on America’s fundamental political, social, and economic institutions from a President who was a “natural born Citizen?” The Founders and Framers included the “natural born Citizen” clause in the Constitution believing that it would give America a better chance of avoiding such a person coming to power. The remedy for such usurpation is to immediately remove Obama from office and to secure that office with a replacement, all consistent with constitutional procedure.

During the Revolution, the People risked their lives, fortunes, and honor to earn the right to decide what powers they wanted to give to any national government that they would eventually constitute for the purpose of protecting themselves. The People drafted and ratified the Constitution as their written expression of their decision in that regard. Now through his new government-run health care system, Obama flouts the will of the People as expressed in the Constitution that the federal government stay out of the private affairs of the People. Obama and his Congress have now assumed powers that the Constitution does not give to the central government but rather leaves in the hands of the People and the States under the Tenth Amendment. And we have seen through Obama’s own words, that he knows that what he is attempting to accomplish is unconstitutional but he will nevertheless force it through by utilizing “political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change.”

Practically speaking, such usurpation is a government attempt at nationalizing over one-sixth (and probably even more once we learn by experience what the full impact of his plan really is) of the private economy. Add to that government ownership of some banks, auto makers, and insurance companies, and we have a very serious assault upon the free enterprise system and the American way of life. Thomas Jefferson told us that “[w]hensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force” and that "nullification of the act is the rightful remedy." Thomas Jefferson, November 16, 1798, Kentucky Resolution at http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mtj:@field(DOCID+@lit(tj080201)).

Jefferson also warned against construing the "necessary and proper" clause so broadly as to justify the assumption of undelegated powers by the general government. He said that the intent of the clause was to only enable the execution of limited powers, not to indefinitely extend the general government's scope. If a broader interpretation were to be given to the clause, this part of the Constitution would be used "to destroy the whole residue of that instrument." Jefferson also counseled the states to be vigilant against violations of the Constitution and not hesitant to attack unconstitutional measures by Congress or the President. He continued: "[F]ree government is founded in jealously and not in confidence" and therefore urged that "no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." In other words, the states and the People should not trust federal officials with non-constitutional powers simply because those officials might be otherwise trusted to exercise those powers benevolently. He warned that this kind of "confidence of man" leads to the destruction of free government. The next question we should ask ourselves is what other assaults upon the Constitution can we expect from Obama and his Congress? Let us keep open our ears and eyes. Let our great States follow Jefferson’s wisdom and protect our freedoms.

The Kerchner et al. v. Obama & Congress et al. case, which challenges both Obama and Congress over Obama having usurped the Office of President and Commander in Chief, is currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia and is awaiting the Court’s decision on plaintiffs’ request for oral argument. Many States and private persons have recently filed lawsuits over Obama’s new national health care plan. It is hoped that the People closely monitor the progress of these law suits as they make their way through the courts and that they make themselves publicly heard on the matter.

This leads me to my final point. We the People need to understand that Obama will surely attempt to change the composition of or influence our judicial branch of government so that he can accomplish his unconstitutional ends. Now we can clearly see how important judicial appointments and an independent judiciary are to the survival of our Constitution and Republic and the freedoms we individuals all enjoy.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 26, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
#### SOURCE.

Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson - Thurs, 25 Mar 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will be on the Let's Talk Liberty Show tonight hosted by Chalice Jackson of the Patriot's Heart Network. Topics to be discussed: Appellant's Reply Brief filing on March 23rd with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA for the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit, Request for Oral Arguments, and the case status and issues in general. The show airs from 9-11 p.m. EST. Atty Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will join the show at 9:30 p.m. EST. Below is the direct link to the Let's Talk Liberty radio show at BlogTalkRadio.com:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotsheartnetwork/2010/03/26/lets-talk-liberty

Link for information on the recent filing with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/kerchner-reply-brief-and-oral-argument.html

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and donate to help the cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org
####

A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers: Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson - Thurs, 25 Mar 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST#links

Commander Kerchner's comments on the Appellant's Reply Brief filed 3/23 by Atty Apuzzo in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit Appeal

Commander Kerchner's comments on the Appellant's Reply Brief filed today(3/23) by Atty Apuzzo in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit Appeal

By now many of you have likely had time to read Attorney Mario Apuzzo's outstanding Appellant's Reply Brief filed today(3/23) with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. The closing two paragraphs sum up the issues and consequences and the duty of the federal court's role in resolving the core constitutional legal question of this lawsuit very well. Imo, Atty Apuzzo's words will live in history. The federal courts must take this case or our Constitutional Republic is doomed and on its way to the scrap heaps of history.

Atty Apuzzo writes on pages 29 & 30:
----------------------------------------
"The Supreme Court has warned us what can happen to our republic if its government does not observe the laws of the land. United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438 (1928). A finding of no jurisdiction will mean that we as a nation accept usurpation and tyranny by a small group of individuals who can act in concert and gain control of both parties and overthrow the constitutional order of our Republic and that citizens of the United States such as the plaintiffs, whose life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property are threatened by such a plan and action, do not have any due process to protect themselves through a legal action in which they ask the judicial branch of government to protect them by enforcing the Constitution.

Judicial review is absolutely necessary when the other two branches of government act in a concerted way to subvert and ignore the Constitution’s requirements defining eligibility standards for the most powerful office of the land, the President and Commander in Chief of the Military. This power balance is important to the survival of our Republic and our Constitution. Plaintiffs’ case goes to the very core of our Constitution, the fundamental law of our land, and whether ultimately our legal system truly means anything when it comes to controversial but critical constitutional issues. For the Court to grant plaintiffs standing, find no violation of the political question doctrine, and rule that it has jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims will do no harm to the role that the judiciary plays in our Constitutional Republic but will rather confirm that elections in America must adhere to the rule of law."
-----------------------------------------

Bravo-Zulu Mario! You have done your job well. In your various briefs you have given the courts the facts and correctly cited the laws of our nation, including the Constitution which is the fundamental law of the land. The decision is now in the hands of the Appellate Court. They must now do their duty in our constitutional system of checks and balances and use their judicial review powers granted to them by We the People in the Constitution, and confirmed by the great Chief Justice John Marshall, to prevent usurpation of power by the other two branches. May they look for guidance to God, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the U.S. Supreme Court decisions you cited in your Appellant's Opening Brief and other briefs, and then do the correct thing per their oath "... to support and defend the Constitution of our United States against all enemies foreign and domestic ... so help me God", and remand the case back to the District Court for a trial on the merits so we can learn before the bar of a court of law the true legal identity of Obama and reveal what he has been hiding from the American people, that he is not an Article II "natural born Citizen" to constitutional standards. And in doing so, We the People will remove the Usurper from the Oval Office.

If you have not read the entire Reply Brief you can read it here(or embedded below):

Kerchner v Obama & Congress - Appellant's Reply Brief - Filed 23 Mar 2010 - U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia PA
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28779811/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-Appeal-Appellant-s-Reply-Brief-filed-23-Mar-2010

May God Bless and Save America,

Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http:www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Appellant's Reply Brief - filed 23 Mar 2010

Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli Can Challenge Obama’s Eligibility, Now. Got Gonads!?

Below this report is the previous report on AG Cuccinelli explaining how to challenge Obama's eligibility.

Via the Post & Email; - Virginia Attorney General can challenge Obama’s eligibility right now - AG KEN CUCCINELLI PLANS TO SUE OVER HEALTH CARE, BUT AN EASIER, LESS EXPENSIVE WAY TO STOP IT IS TO DEMAND THAT OBAMA PROVE HIS ELIGIBILITY

March 23, 2010 - Dear Editor: Please, please, please, take a minute and read all of the information recently posted at; http://www.t-room.us. It is an open letter to Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli asking him why he is going the expensive route of a lawsuit challenging the recently passed Healthcare bill when he has an ELECTION FRAUD COMPLAINT built on strong circumstantial evidence?

Why did Bob Bauer, Obama’s attorney, request that a FEDERAL COURT in Pennsylvania take judicial notice of a computer screen? It was not an official piece of paper you or I could hold and touch and feel in our hands of his “supposed” Certification of Live Birth issued by the state of Hawaii. Bauer actually had the nerve to ask a federal judge to take judicial notice of a COMPUTER SCREEN! Thankfully, the judge denied his request.

I filed this complaint with our Attorney General’s office on September 21, 2009. Why have I not heard a peep from his office? Better yet, why would AG Cuccinelli pursue an expensive legal case challenging the constitutionality of the recent Healthcare bill when he has a legitimate, strong, and factually-based complaint detailing election fraud perpetrated on Virginians in 2008?

Your answer is as good as mine. Read the post. Read the letter to AG Cuccinelli. Read the Complaint. It is all right there! The Commonwealth can ill afford taking on such an expensive lawsuit, especially since there is an easier and more affordable way to get to the bottom of Obama’s ineligibility.

This is not a birther issue. This is a US Constitutional issue. Download the complaint, add your contact info and slam the AG with it. We don’t need to be spending hundreds of thousands of our dollars on a lawsuit when we have the evidence we’ve put together in the Complaint challenging Pelosi, by asking her what evidence she had prior to her signing the Certification of Nomination forms in August of 2008 declaring Obama was eligible.

http://www.t-room.us/2010/03/open-letter-to-kenneth-t-cuccinelli-ii-attorney-general-of-virginia/

Send this email far and wide. All patriots need to know that we are getting ready to expend hundreds of thousands of dollars we can ill afford right now, all while the most expedient and strongest case sits at the AG’s fingertips. Just ask the question!!! SOURCE.

Attorney General Election Fraud Complaints;

South Carolina; http://www.scribd.com/doc/21676023/jbjd

Georgia; http://www.scribd.com/doc/21675349/jbjd

Virginia; http://www.scribd.com/doc/24321780/jbjd

Maryland; http://www.scribd.com/doc/21675353/jbjd

Texas; http://www.scribd.com/doc/21675344/jbjd

Hawaii; http://www.scribd.com/doc/19754421/jbjdhawaiimodelelectionfraudcomplaintag

Please use this important information! The work has been done for you. All you have to do is click print then sign and send! More details on the AG Complaints HERE. http://jbjd.wordpress.com

Previous report on Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli(3/15); Please call and show your support for this issue!

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli
Office of the Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 786-2071
E-mail the Attorney General HERE.

Via Politico; Virginia AG: Obama birth certificate will 'get tested'

Virginia Democratic blogger Not Larry Sabato posts the audio of a conversation with Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli -- recorded, the bloggers says, during the transition -- taking Obama conspiracy theories extremely seriously, and talking about legal options.

"It will get tested in my view when someone… when he signs a law, and someone is convicted of violating it and one of their defenses will be it is not a law because someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it," Cuccinelli says on the recording, suggesting its "possible" that he would challenge it.

"Someone is going to have to come forward with nailed down testimony that he was born in place B, wherever that is. You know, the speculation is Kenya. And that doesn’t seem beyond the realm of possibility," he says.

Which, actually, it is.

Cuccinelli's office didn't immediately respond to a question about the audio.

ALSO: Cuccinelli is emerging as a real irritant to Bob McDonnell, and his campaign pledge to govern as a moderate, and to avoid the cultural issues he steered away from during the campaign. McDonnell recently reversed an executive order that quietly lifted protections for gay employees after Cuccinelli trumpeted it in letters to colleges telling them they were free to discriminate. Source

The left is in full swing HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE. From the Hill, h/t OFI.

####: Talking Points Memo and the Hill are now reporting; Cuccinelli: 'I Absolutely Believe That President Obama Was Born In The United States'... More HERE and HERE. h/t: TCM

####(3/16): World Net Daily is reporting this; Virginia questions Obama's eligibility - 'It's not law if qualified president isn't signing it'

Cuccinelli released a statement this week that the recording, apparently made either while he was campaigning for the office or shortly after he was elected, was a "hypothetical" answer to a "hypothetical" question.

Spokesman Brian Gottstein in Cuccinelli's office today explained to WND Cuccinelli is battling the Obama White House on many fronts: health care, the EPA's determination on carbon dioxide and others.

"If it does get taken to court, we'll deal with it then. That's right now not what he's doing." Source.

[The fact is it really doesn't matter where Obama was born! LOOK HERE! ]

Appellant's Reply Brief Filed in the Kerchner v Obama, Congress, Pelosi et. al., Lawsuit/Quo Warranto

Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Reply Brief in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit, which is embedded below. As reported here last night they also requested an oral argument. Previous reports on the Kerchner v Obama lawsuit can be viewed HERE.

Via Mario Apuzzo's Blog; - Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal Reply Brief and Oral Argument Request Filed -

I have completed filing the Kerchner Reply Brief and Request for Oral Argument. These documents may be accessed at the indicated links. All parties have completed filing all briefs and now we just need a decision from the Court. We will now wait and see if the Third Circuit Court of Appeals grants my request for oral argument and if so when the oral argument will be. If oral argument is granted, it will take place at the United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The courthouse is located right across the street from Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell.

I want to thank all of my supporters on this blog and all those who visit here to find out what is going on with the Obama eligibility issue.

I will be posting more essays on natural law, the law of nations, Emer de Vattel, the Founders and Framers, the Courts, and the meaning of the "natural born Citizen" clause.

Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal Reply Brief(embedded below): http://www.scribd.com/doc/28779811/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Appellant-s-Reply-Brief-22-Mar-2010

Request for Oral Argument: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28781505/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Request-for-Oral-Argument

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 23, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
#### SOURCE.

Kerchner v Obama Appeal - Appellant's Reply Brief

HELP THE CAUSE: PROTECT OUR LIBERTY LEGAL ACTION PUBLICITY & EDUCATION FUND

Florida Man Charges Obama with Treason! Got Treason!?

The issue that will not go away. A man in Florida has filed a document charging Barack Obama with Treason.

Via the Post & Email; - Citizen charges Obama with treason - COURT DOCUMENT FILED BY FLORIDA RESIDENT CLAIMS OBAMA HAS ADMITTED HIS INELIGIBILITY FOR OFFICE

by Sharon Rondeau, (Mar. 22, 2010) — A Pinellas County, Florida man has filed a court document which states that Barack Hussein Obama II is guilty of treason by virtue of being ineligible for the office he holds.

The document, date-stamped March 18, 2010, was filed by William Spencer Connerat III and claims that Obama’s failure to answer his requests for confirmation of his natural born Citizenship is an “admission of ineligibility” and “the basis for an act of treason.”

The two letters sent previously were dated November 11, 2008 and February 26, 2009, respectively. ...full report HERE.

Obama an Unconstitutional Illegal President - 20100201 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Request for Oral Argument filed in Kerchner v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et. al. Lawsuit...

Oral argument requested in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit in the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. The request was filed 3/20/10. Previous reports on the Kerchner v Obama/Congress lawsuit can be viewed HERE.

Below is the appellant's request for oral argument, filed on 3/20/10...

KERCHNER v OBAMA (APPEAL) - Appellant Request for Oral Argument - Transport Room

Support the Commander Kerchner, ProtectOurLiberty.org Washington Times Ads HERE. [image source]

TODAY(3/22) Operation: It's as simple as that! White House/DOJ Protest Phone Blitz... | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records

To all the members of the ORYR Group(s) who have been asking for another White House protest blitz... Here you go and some;

Operation: It's as simple as that!

Date; March 22, 2010

Time; 8am est. - ???

Place; Home, car, work, wherever there is a phone and or computer.

White House contact info;
WH Comments: 202-456-1111
WH Switchboard: 202-456-1414
WH FAX: 202-456-2461
WH Web contact form: http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Official White House Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse

Department of Justice contact info;
Department of Justice Main Switchboard: 202-514-2000
Office of the Attorney General Public Comment Line: 202-353-1555
Official Department of Justice Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/DOJ

***Report a Complaint about Waste, Fraud, Abuse, or Misconduct in the Department of Justice: http://www.justice.gov/oig/FOIA/hotline.htm

The reason I added the DOJ is the fact they have been defending Obama in numerous eligibility lawsuits to gain access to Obama's records and proof of his natural born Citizenship. For the last year Obama has used our tax dollars via the Department of Justice to quash every attempt to seek truth and justice.

Just ask this simple question; Why is Obama fighting the release of ALL his past records, with lawyers paid with OUR tax dollars...

Give them one demand; Obama, Release Your Records!

Previous ORYR Protest Events HERE and HERE.

http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com/

http://www.BirtherReport.com/

'Operation: It's as simple as that' Facebook Event page; http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=353764838385





Back by Popular Demand; Operation: It's as simple as that! White House/DOJ Protest Phone Blitz... Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records

The Proof is in the Pudding, Evidence In! Obama's Factcheck.org COLB is a Big FAKE! What about the Social Security Breach? Got 4 COLB's!?

As previously reported HERE, HERE, and HERE; Obama's campaign posted 4 different images of a Certification of Live Birth on the Internet. Several document and computer image experts have deemed the Obama COLB(s) as fakes. If you have not yet researched the Obama COLB then this report from the Post & Email will explain it point by point. More from previous reports below the P&E report.

Via the Post & Email; - Obama’s Forged “Certification of Live Birth”: The Evidence - DID FACTCHECK PROVIDE THE LINK BETWEEN THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN AND THE 2008 PASSPORT FILE BREACHES? ...must read report HERE.

Before you go there check out these 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB;

1) Daily Kos COLB; http://palabre.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/bo_birth_certificate-kos.jpg

2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg

3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg

4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg

I encourage all to view the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE.

And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...

In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.
FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source.

Related to the Social Security Breach? John Brennan, is Obama’s Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and counter terrorism. The tamperer was a contract worker for the company Brennan was the CEO of. A co-conspirator and key witness in the case was found dead, shot in the head, in his car, outside a church, shortly after.

"Back in March 2008, the State Department launched an investigation of improper computer access to passport records of Barack Husssein Obama. The investigation was focusing on one employee — a contract worker with a company headed by an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama... ...full investigative report HERE. Don't forget the Post & Email report HERE.

The question is; How much longer are we going to let Obama aka Soetoro get away with this?