Tuesday, November 30, 2010

New Details on LTC Lakin: Ignored Letters From Lakin Family to Obama & Hawaii; No Witnesses, Documents, Explanation at Court-Martial...

Via the Greeley Gazette; - Lakin not allowed witnesses, documents, explanation at court-martial Dec. 14! - By Jack Minor

Letters obtained by The Gazette reveal the extent to which a decorated Army officer and his brother struggled to resolve concerns over the President’s eligibility prior to the officer being court-martialed.

The Lakins are long-time Greeley residents. Three Lakin brothers; Dr. Greg Lakin, Capt. Gary Lakin USCG and Lt. Col. Terrance Lakin graduated from University High School in 1977, 1980 and 1983 respectively. The brothers' parents still live in Greeley and have a long history of supporting humanitarian causes in the area.

Lt. Col. Lakin is currently scheduled to be court-martialed Dec. 14 for disobeying orders to deploy after exhausting numerous attempts to resolve issues regarding the President’s eligibility to be Commander-in-Chief. The specific issue involved is the Constitutional requirement that the President be a natural born citizen.

Dr. Greg Lakin has previously been a member of the Greeley Police Department and was a prosecutor in Hawaii. Greg, who was interviewed on the Peter Boyles radio show on Nov. 9, said Lakin, “mulled over this for a long period of time” before he made his decision to refuse to deploy to Afghanistan. He strongly disputed the contention that his brother was a coward for deploying, noting Terry had already served in both Bosnia and Afghanistan.

Military Judge, Denise Lind, has ruled that Lakin will not be able to present any witnesses or documents for his defense and will not be able to explain his reason for disobeying orders at the court-martial. Lind has ruled the issue of the President’s eligibility is irrelevant saying the orders came from the Pentagon and not the President. Dr. Lakin disputed this contention saying the President took credit for Lakin’s deployment during a speech at West Point where he gave a speech for the surge in Afghanistan. “He was part of that surge so it would be an order that comes directly from Obama himself” and “if he doesn’t have standing then no one does.”

In an interview with the Gazette, Dr. Lakin shared copies of letters he and his brother sent to the President and Hawaiian Governor Linda Lingle asking for a resolution of this issue. Greg said the letters were written with a very humble spirit in an attempt to seek information verifying Barack Obama’s birthplace.

Greg drew a contrast between his brother and the President saying his brother is upholding the constitution, “while the other has probably violated it.” He went on to say the President “promotes transparency in government unless it applies to him. On the other hand, Terry is convinced that justice will prevail.”

Lt. Col. Lakin sent a letter to the President prior to being charged saying, as part of the deployment orders, he was required to submit his long form birth certificate and he was “glad to obey this order, and will provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital.” He said he “attempted through my chain of command for many months to get answers to the relentless questions surrounding your eligibility, but was informed that I lack standing. I also sought answers, unsuccessfully, through my Congressional delegation.” He went on to explain the reason for his request had nothing to do with personal differences. “Please assure the American people that you are indeed constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct service members into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but want to do so with the knowledge and peace of mind that this important provision of our Constitution is respected and obeyed.”

Dr. Lakin, in his first letter to the president prior to his brother’s arraignment, implored Obama to put the matter to rest stressing his brother tried to resolve the matter through proper channels but was rebuffed. “Approximately 20 months ago while continuing to serve in the Army he attempted to seek clarification regarding your birth certificate through proper military channels. Lt. Col. Lakin filed his requests through the normal chain of command (as the military advised) but continued to meet with frustration as the Army was unable to provide any clarification with regard to your place of birth. He believes this raises a Constitutional issue, a Constitution which he has sworn to uphold.” He stresses that his brother would gladly deploy in an instant once his questions have been answered, saying Terry “remains ready and willing to continue to serve his country in areas of conflict - as he has done in Afghanistan and Bosnia. I believe that upon meeting with my idealistic and principled brother you would find him professional, compassionate and worth helping.” Dr. Lakin even suggested a way to defuse the situation saying that “a meeting with him or our family, whether you chose to do this in private or public setting, would likely defuse this matter.”

He also sent a letter to Hawaiian Governor Linda Lingle who he met several times while he was a prosecuting attorney in Maui County. He told her that “a short meeting or phone with him or family (whether done privately or publicly - your choice), would completely defuse this matter.” The suggestion is significant as Lingle has said she personally told her health director to examine the birth certificate saying “I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the President was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.”

Dr. Lakin sent another letter to the President after the initial court-martial date was set. In the letter Greg told the president he was a supporter who was pleased to see him elected in 2008. He reiterated that Terry made this decision only after other options had been exhausted. “It is a shame that no one above him in the military ranks and no one in Congress, who represents him, could address his concerns so that he could have avoided the prospect of such an enormous penalty for staying faithful to the oath he swore as an officer.” He went on to say that Col. Lakin was far from alone in his concerns saying, “Many others in uniform share this concern and have conveyed their support to my brother.”

Showing he understands the divisiveness the issue has caused, he told the President, “We should use all means necessary to avoid an escalated controversy this fall when his court-martial is scheduled. There is much strife and tension in this nation now and this would not be healthy or productive.” Emphasizing the desire to find a resolution of the eligibility issue once and for all so the matter could be put to rest, Lakin said, “My family stands ready to provide any further information you might need and to offer our assistance to try to broker any compromise or negotiation that might be acceptable to all parties. We are deeply distressed over this situation, and do not believe that Terry deserves to be imprisoned simply for seeking assurances that he is following legal orders.”

Greg stated that he has not received any response to his letters and is concerned the Army will simply take the easy way out by avoiding the issue and simply lock up his brother. He said based on his experience as a prosecutor in situations like this where there is no case law, “Judges go in with a pre-determined idea how they are going to decide it and take case law and policy statements to say whatever they want. There is no magic law that supports either position.”

Greg said if his brother is not allowed to present evidence on his behalf and is convicted he would be forced to leave his practice to advocate for his brother saying, “My reluctant but determined response would be to forego my busy medical practice treating drug addicts and elderly patients to organize a public outcry for America’s new military political prisoner.”

As the issue drags on,... continued here; http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=6890

LTC Lakin's Brother on Revolution Radio: LTC Lakin's Had Other Active Duty Military that Want to Sign Onboard; I'll Carry the Flag on this One! Interview at Source.

Wikipedia Scrubs LTC Terry Lakin Article in 71 Minutes; Jerome Corsi and Al Discuss Scrubbing of LTC Lakin Article with Peter Boyles. Interview at Source.

Dr. Corsi on LTC Lakin's Court-Martial & Obama's Usurpation: pResidents that hide documents are taking a big risk; extensive cover-up going on. Interview at Source.

LTC Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin on Court-Martial; He's Taking His Stand and He is Ready to Defend It, Got Obama's First Political Prisoner!? Interview at Source.

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin's Brother Dr. Greg Lakin and World Net Daily's Jerome Corsi on the Peter Boyles Show to Discuss Lt. Col. Lakin. Interview at Source.

An Original Song Dedicated to Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin: By Patra; It's Time to Know the Truth. Song embedded below and at Source.

Action Alert, Calling All Patriots: Countdown to the Court Martial; LIEUTENANT COLONEL TERRY LAKIN ACTION ALERT, NOVEMBER, 2010.(Don't let up!) More details at Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
LTC Lakin - A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama’...
Citizen v natural born Citizen-It's Don't Ask Don't Tell-20100809 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Again CNN's Anderson Cooper Gets Obama's Eligibility Wrong: Representative Leo Berman; Obama Born a Dual Citizen, No Records Released.

Video below: Hey Anderson, give me five minutes of airtime with you and I will have you pedaling back to the bathhouse with your boyfriend... The State Department website clearly states; "Please note, some short (abstract) versions of birth certificates may not be acceptable for passport purposes."...  For the millionth time, that fake thing posted online is called a Certification of Live Birth, not a Certificate of Live aka birth certificate, and it sure the hell isn't an original birth certificate as you claim. Anderson, Hawaii officials can and will release a long-form birth certificate with a person's permission as proven here. Anderson, one more thing, how in the hell can a dual citizen at birth be a "natural born Citizen"??? Oh, and, you can shove that CRS report up your arse!

UPDATE: Hey Anderson, sorry to bother you again but I have a few questions and a request. No one outside of Obama's campaign and allegedly those two college kids at FactCheck.org (Factcheck.org is funded and run by the Annenberg Foundation which also employed Bill "I wish I'd planted more bombs" Ayers and Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah AKA Barry Soetoro) have even ever seen in person or held the alleged paper document version of the COLB document folded and photographed and put on the internet.

Why have not the experts from CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC investigative reporters along with independent forensic document examiners not all been allowed to visit wherever that document is being held now and to handle it and examine it?

Why won't Obama even do that?

No one in the major media has ever been allowed to see or handle or examine the alleged source document used to make those photos. Could the reason be because you would see that it was a document printed and created and then folded for pictures from a forged digital image, not vice versa? Dr. Ron Polland explained how it was done with transparency film pasted on paper.

Anderson, why don't you challenge Obama to allow CNN investigative reporters along with Fox News investigative reporters and an independent certified document forensics examiner to go to Chicago or the White House and examine the document!?

No one of any consequence has ever seen and handled this doc. All we have is internet images and pictures on the net and computer print outs of same waved on a TV screen.





Check out the 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;


1) Daily Kos COLB; http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg  


2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg


3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg


4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg


All should view the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.

And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.

Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel; Obama’s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.

And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.

Bonus; CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama’s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established – the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #1: Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama’s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.

Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #2: While Obama’s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.

Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Official Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth vs Obama's Certification of Live Birth
2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nomination for Presidential Candidates -
2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate with constitutionally eligible provision - Hawaii
2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate without constitutionally eligible provision - Georgia
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-10-04 pg 5



David Neiwert of Crooks and Liars Embarrasses Himself by Being Clueless About the Natural Born Citizen Grandfather Clause, Got Comprehension!?

David Neiwert of Crooks and Liars isn't the only person that's clueless about the grandfather clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Many obots and even non-obots like to say none of our founders could have become President if Article II required two citizen parents. All you have to do is read Article II of the Constitution and you will see the founders clearly knew "natural born Citizen" and "Citizen" were not one in the same: the irrefutable proof is here;

"No person except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a CITIZEN of the United States, AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION, shall be eligible to the office of President;..."

Via Real Truth Online; - Dave Neiwert Embarrasses Himself by Being Clueless About the Natural Born Citizen Grandfather Clause -

In defending Obama’s citizenship and attempting to refute 'birthers', Neiwert suggests most founding fathers wouldn’t be eligible for the Presidency if they needed two American citizen parents, but completely ignores the grandfather clause which exempted those born before 1787 from needing two American citizen parents

by Larry Simons
November 30, 2010

Leave it to the Bill O’Reilly of the Left, Dave Neiwert to make his points by completely ignoring facts and embarrassing himself in a grand display of ignorance for thousands to see. In his latest article [from the site ironically called Crooks and Liars] titled, “Birthers' newest claim: Obama not a 'natural born citizen' because father was Kenyan UPDATED”, Neiwert discusses the matter of a “new” claim made by “birthers” [which is actually an old claim] that Barack Obama is not eligible to be President because his father was a British citizen [Kenya was under British rule in 1961, the time of Obama’s birth].

Then, in sheer hilarity, Neiwert says this:

“What's really funny about this theory is that these fetishists of all things from the Founding Fathers would thus have disqualified one of the leading founders, Thomas Jefferson, from the presidency.”

Actually, the thing that is really, really funny is the fact that Neiwert apparently has never read the actual section of the Constitution that exempts all Americans who were American citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution [in 1787] from needing two American citizen parents.
Article II, Section I, clause 5 states:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

What is also equally rib-tickling is that after quoting attorney Mario Apuzzo, who is bringing a lawsuit against Barack Obama, as saying, “The courts and Congress have never changed the definition,” said Apuzzo. “The founding fathers understood that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces needed to have two American citizens as parents so that American values would be imparted to him.”, Neiwert says, “This is pretty odd reasoning. Especially when you consider that the same standard would have disqualified Thomas Jefferson -- whose mother, Jane Randolph Jefferson, was born in London, England.” Although Neiwert is correct that Thomas Jefferson’s mother was born in England, she would have become an American citizen anyway by marriage to Peter Jefferson if America had been formed at the time of her marriage in 1739.

Turns out, Jane Jefferson did not have to be an American citizen anyway, because the Constitution’s grandfather clause clearly states that all American citizens [even those not natural born] who were alive at the adoption of the Constitution are eligible for the Presidency. Two Presidents were automatically grandfathered in: Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. Four other presidents who were born after the adoption of the Constitution who some consider not to be natural born citizens are as follows:

James Buchanan ---father became American citizen upon marriage to Buchanan’s mother, Elizabeth Speer. The reason why Obama’s father cannot claim American citizenship status upon marriage to Ann Dunham is because he was a Kenyan national [therefore a British citizen] and the British Nationality Law of 1948 does NOT allow dual citizenship. He could not have enjoyed American citizenship after marriage to Ann Dunham while at the same time stayed a Kenyan national. [see Obama info below].

Chester Arthur---(1881-1885) Born: October 5, 1829 in Fairfield, Vermont. Father- William Arthur, when eighteen years of age, emigrated from Co. Antrim, Ireland. Father did not become a naturalized citizen until 14 years after Chester Arthur’s birth. Mother- Malvina Stone born April 29, 1802 in Berkshire, Franklin, Vermont. Chester Arthur born with dual citizenship of the United Kingdom and the United States. Chester Arthur lied numerous times about his past to obfuscate his ineligibility to hold Vice-Presidential and Presidential office. Burned all personal records upon his death.

Woodrow Wilson’s mother Jessie Janet Woodrow automatically became a US citizen upon her marriage to his US citizen father, Reverend Dr. Joseph Ruggles Wilson.

Herbert Hoover’s mother, Hulda Randall Minthorn, automatically gained US citizenship upon her marriage to Hoover’s father, Jesse Hoover in 1870.

Only one President [outside of Chester Arthur] has been questioned about the citizenship of his parents: Barack Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama II---(2009-) Born: August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii. Father- Barack Obama, Sr. was born in Kanyadhiang village, Rachuonyo District, Lake Victoria, Kendu Bay, Kenya (at the time a colony of the British Empire) in 1936. Mother- Stanley Ann Dunham, later know as Ann Dunham Soetoro after divorce from Obama II’s father, was born at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas on November 29, 1942. Father was not a naturalized citizen at the time of his birth. Barack Obama II was born with dual citizenship of the United Kingdom and the United States. Possible adoption by Indonesian father coupled with continuance of Indonesian citizenship as an adult (travel to Pakistan, possible US college enrollment as a foreign student) could negate US citizenship or at least imply another dual citizenship. Circumstantial evidence exists Obama II born in Kenya and his parents later registered the birth in Hawaii. If born in Kenya, Obama II is not a US citizen at all due to 1952 statute not allowing mother to convey citizenship due to her age and time residing in United States past the age of 14.

Of all the comments posted under Neiwert’s story, only one [at the time of my writing] understood the grandfather clause while still dismissing that Obama is uneligible for the Presidency.

“dad23g” wrote:

Let's clarify a few things. While the Birther argument is preposterous, we should be clear on the facts on which the argument is based, for easier refutation. Article II of the US Constitution states: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” As the Founders were Citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, they were exempt from being natural born citizens to be eligible for the presidency. So arguing that the Birther theory would invalidate Jefferson's presidency gets us nowhere.


The Birther argument is that a "natural born citizen" must be born in the US of two parents who were citizens at the time of the birth. So someone born in the US, whose parents are citizens at the time of the birth, can be a "natural born citizen" (and therefore eligible for the presidency) even if one or both parents are merely citizens but not "natural born citizens." In other words, if you are born here, and both parents are naturalized citizens of foreign birth, you are eligibile for the presidency but your parents are not. So, if Obama's father was not a US citizen at the time he was born, their position is that Obama is not eligible for the presidency. Again, everyone born here whose parents were citizens but not born here are still eligible for the presidency, so arguing that those people are no longer eligible gets us nowhere.


The real refutation of the Birther argument is that the courts have held that the citizenship status of the parents is irrelevant. "Natural born" means born here. The rest is noise.

Whether “dad23g” is correct about the courts deeming citizenship of the parents irrelevant or not does not mean that the true definition of “natural born” does not mean both parents of a presidential candidate must be American citizens.

In my view, there would have been no need for the founders to include the grandfather clause, stating “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” if they simply meant that any U.S. citizen was eligible for the Presidency. They could have simply stated, “No person, except a United States citizen, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

...continued here; http://realtruthonline.blogspot.com/2010/11/dave-neiwert-embarrasses-himself-by.html

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-29 pg 5



Monday, November 29, 2010

The Birther Beat Goes On: Author of "Obama Identity" on Fox News; Obama's Grandmother Said Obama Was Born in Mombasa, Kenya!

Video; This would be funny if it wasn't true. Watch how the Fox News hosts quickly change the subject when the former congressman and author of "Obama Identity" John Leboutillier brings up the fact that Obama's Kenyan grandmother stated numerous times on the record that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.

The fact is numerous individuals in Kenya stated on the record that Obama was indeed born in Kenya, which includes Kenyan government officials. Even Obama's own wife stated on video that Obama is Kenyan. The question remains; when in the hell will the American media do their job and investigate and report the truth about Obama's questionable and criminal past!?

Hat tip to the Conservative Monster for the Fox video clip.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].






Minister in Kenyan Natl Assembly on 25Mar2010 states Obama "born in Kenya" - "not native American"
Kenyan Ministers Orengo & Khalwale: Obama "born in Kenya"-"not native American"-"should repatriate"

Supreme Court Denies Kerchner v Obama Petition; Justices Continue Evading Obama's Eligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief.


[UPDATES BELOW INCLUDING STATEMENT FROM COMMANDER KERCHNER]
Supreme Court Denies Kerchner v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi Petition for a Writ of Certiorari; Justices Continue Evading Obama's Eligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief...

Via the SCOTUS Order List for 11/29/10: 10-446 - KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.

The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Check back later for any updates and or news regarding this expected but disgracful decision by the SCOTUS. Justice Thomas stuck by his words! The ball is clearly in the new Congresses court! Time to put full pressure on them.     >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

UPDATES:  DrKatesView; Supreme Court COWARDS, more here. - CNN reports on the Kerchner case nearly two years after it was first filed, shameful commies; Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship, more here. The Conservative Monster; Supreme Court Denies Kerchner vs Obama. - Uses WikiLeaks Drama as The Perfect Distraction, more here. The Birthers.org; The Supreme Court failed to uphold the Constitution - Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, more here. World Net Daily; Supremes punt on Obama eligibility again - Lawyer: decision 'doesn't mean that this issue goes away', more here.

Comment from lead Plaintiff Commander Charles Kerchner; The "Roberts Court" of the U.S. Supreme Court imo will be known in history as the Neville Chamberlain supreme court, the great Obama appeaser court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain

Appeasement due to fear that some immediate small amount of veiled and threatened violence from the far left Saul Alinsky goons and tyrants and bullies and thus not doing the right thing early only to support the rule of law and the Constitution ultimately leads to be much bigger problem later. History has shown us that over and over. This matter should have been addressed by the media and political parties early in the spring of 2008 during the primaries. It wasn't. Congress should have addressed this when asked and when constitutionally it was required to. It didn't. The courts should have addressed the merits of the questions when appealed to early on. They didn't. Everyone in our system of government chose appeasement over confrontation and punted the ball to someone else. Now it is far worse. The Supreme Court has chosen appeasement and inaction over action and dealing with the issue and questions openly in a court of law under the rules of evidence and law. Our Constitutional Republic and legal system is now compromised and broken. And it will only get worse as our legal system and constitutional republic further deteriorates and the rule of law gives way more and more to appeasement of bullies such as Obama and his far left cronies and puppet masters. Appeasement of the constitutional usurpers will not make it go away. It will only delay the inevitable and fester and in the end be a far worse situation to deal with when the real nature of the tyrant reveals himself in a bolder way and takes away all our liberties. Neville Chamberlain tactics never work with bullies, tyrants, and national socialists.

The U.S. Supreme Court orders were posted at 10:00 a.m. on 29 Nov 2010. Certiorari for our case was denied. The two justices appointed by Obama who had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have! Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36. The two justices and the court ignored that. There were recusals declared by these two Obama appointees in many other petitions including the one immediately before our petition in the orders list and the one immediately after. Imo, apparently the court needed all nine justices in the room to kill the petition. With the full court of 9 justices it's the rule/vote of 4 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. With two recusals that would have left only 7 justices and it's then the rule/vote of 3 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS were that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 ... financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####



The full SCOTUS Order List and Petition embedded below. Previous reports on Kerchner v Obama can be found here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al - Supreme Court Order List Page 15 - 11/29/10
Kerchner v Obama/Congress/Pelosi - Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court - 9/30...
Kerchner v Obama/Congress/Pelosi - Amicus Curiae Brief Filed by the Western Center for Journalism to Suppor...
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-08 pg 5

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Chicago Tribune's Eric Zorn Labels High-Ranking Members of the United States Military that Uphold Their Oaths as Whackjobs, Got Plastered with Radical Friends and Acquaintances!?


[updates below] This past week the Chicago Tribune decided to publish a piece on the Commander Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al lawsuit which is now awaiting a response from the Supreme Court of the United States. Instead of doing a full-blown investigative piece on the historic Petition for Writ of Certiorari they aimed their guns and fired off a hit-piece libeling those who seek transparency and justice in regards to Obama's Constitutional Eligibility to be President and Commander-in-Chief.

The hit-piece is titled; - Because a Constitutional crisis is just what this nation needs right now - by Eric Zorn

Snippet; And since one must be a "natural-born citizen" to be president and Barack Obama's father was not, as everyone acknowledges, a U.S. citizen, the whackjobs who have been unsuccessful in their "he was born in Kenya!" effort, are now hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court will help in their cause to declare him ineligible to hold office. -snip- Source.

If Mr. Zorn spent less time going out and getting plastered he might be able to rehabilitate some of those braincells he's clearly lacking to do some critical thinking and investigative writing. How does it feel, Zorn?

Now, before I continue, let us see who these so-called "whackjobs" this disgraceful Eric Zorn libels...

Members of the Armed Forces that have or are judicially challenging Obama's Eligibility to be Commander-in-Chief; Cmdr. Charles Kerchner, Capt. Pamela Barnett, Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick,  Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Col. Hollister, Cmdr. Douglas Stoeppelwerth, Maj. Stefan Cook, Lt. Cmdr. John Steidel, Colonel Harry Riley, Lt. Col. Richard Bauerbach, Lt. Col. Mark Wriggle, LCDR Jeff Winthrope, Capt. Robin Biron, Col. John Blair, Capt. Harry Butler, MSGT Steven Neuenschwander, Major David Mosby, Capt. David Smithey, MSGT Jeffrey Schwilk, Sgt. Jeffrey Rosner, SFC E7 Robert Perry, Chief Warrant Of.Thomas Davidson, Sgt. Jason Freese and Commander David LaRoque...

As Citizen Wells points out; He(Zorn) displays a total lack of understanding about Obama’s eligibility issues and the Kerchner case.

First of all, we don’t know where in the hell Obama was born, since he has avoided presenting a legitimate birth certificate. Secondly, Zorn has got some nerve calling a retired naval commander, LTC Terry Lakin, multiple generals and millions of concerned Americans “whackjobs.”

Eric Zorn, we have a constitutional crisis now, due to people like you in the media not doing your journalistic job.

Eric Zorn, call me. Get your facts straight before making an ass out of yourself.

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans -snip- Source.

Mr. Zorn, you owe the members of the Military listed above and millions of Americans an apology. I'm quite sure you already know more people agree with us "Birthers" than YOU and your ilk!? ...Right, Mr. Zorn?

Feel free to email Eric Zorn and let him know he's a disgrace for calling members of the Armed Forces "whackjobs" and he should retract his libelous piece. There is an email tool located at the bottom of this post and at the top right of this page. Zorn's email address is; ericzorn@gmail.com --- ericzorn@gmail.com

UPDATE: Zorn's previous writings explains Zorn's defense of Obama and his attack on members of the Armed Forces. He is a staunch defender of Obama's close friends and domestic terrorists, Bill "I wish I'd planted more bombs" Ayers and Bernadine "stick a fork in the pigs is wild" Dohrn.

Dated 10/8/2008, regarding Bill Ayers; - What is (and isn't)`terrorism'? -

My view is that one can unequivocally condemn the campaign of destruction and bomb-setting waged by the Weather Underground and still ask whether "terrorism" is or was the right word to describe that form of violent guerrilla protest.

To me, a terrorist is one who attempts to create malleable fear in a population through random acts of mayhem; someone who uses his own amoral unpredictability to magnify the power he is attempting to exert in an effort to create change.

Someone who bombs an abortion clinic or animal-research facility, say, in the middle of the night is not a terrorist, by this definition, because the purpose is not to prompt employees or clients to fear for their safety.

Someone who bombs an abortion clinic or animal-research facility in the middle of day is a terrorist, by this definition, because the purpose is to prompt fear not only among employees and clients of that clinic, but among employees and clients of other clinics.

Put another way, terrorists want to take innocent lives; violent guerrilla protesters (if that's the best way to say it) don't.

I see such a practical and moral difference between the two that using "terrorist" to describe them both strikes me as inaccurate, misleading, and, in the case of Ayers, deliberately inflammatory... Source; http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/10/what-is-and-isn.html

Dated 8/16/2008, re-published by Zorn regarding Bill Ayers; The calm after the storm -- School reform crusader Bill Ayers works within the system now, but don't ask the former Weatherman to apologize for his radical past.

...He is proud of his radical past and his progressive present, which has been resolutely non-violent since years before he emerged from the underground in 1980. Today, Ayers is a leading voice in Chicago's educational reform efforts and the small-schools movement, which seeks to create small, student-centered facilities to replace the sprawling city schools where children get lost in overcrowded classrooms, the kind of schools most often found in the country's poorest neighborhoods.

Education equals liberation is Ayers' battle cry now. Schools, not jails. Books, not bombs.

Ayers and an old comrade from SDS, Mike Klonsky, run the Small Schools Workshop to mentor and provide guidance and technical support to educators seeking to start small schools. So far, the workshop has helped 150 such schools open their doors.

"We've learned how to work within the system," says Klonsky. "The fight to save and improve public education embodies all the issues we were fighting for back then."

The two men "are like family" today, Klonsky says. But back then, "I led the fight against the Weatherman," he says. "I wasn't big on blowing up toilets and statues. They wrote a big piece denouncing me. Bill was one of the co-signers. Now we're on the same train. We still disagree about things, but . . . as long as we don't talk about '69, we're OK."

It irks Ayers when people tell him-as they often do-how hard it is to believe that he was once a Weatherman. "What do they expect," he asks, "horns and tails? We were ordinary people trying to do our best in extraordinarily extreme and violent times."... Source; http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/08/the-calm-after.html

Now read these articles about the nexus between Bill Ayers, Michael Klonsky and Barack Obama and then remember the words of Obama as Ayers being just some guy he knows in his neighborhood. And Eric Zorn appears to be their press agents rehabilitating and rewriting history for them, i.e., Ayers and Klonsky and obviously Obama which he continues to protect to today. He's obviously part of the network of fellow travelers in Chicago. Read these two below...

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/5905

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/another-obama-ayers-klonsky-lenz-nexis

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].




Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-08 pg 5

Friday, November 26, 2010

Colonel Gregory Hollister's Obama eligibility case goes to the Supreme Court: SCOTUS challenged to put Constitution above Twitter, Got Three!?

[update here] This is an update to the Colonel Gregory Hollister v. Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama, et al, lawsuit that was in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  Once the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed at the SCOTUS is posted online I will embed it below. The two previous filings by Col. Hollister in the Appeals court embedded below. This makes three eligibility cases against Obama now pending before the Supreme Court, more details on the other cases here and here. Got Three's Company!?

Via WND: Supremes challenged to put Constitution above Twitter - Case questioning eligibility says facts don't support Obama story - Bob Unruh

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the Constitution will trump Twitter on issues of national importance, including the eligibility of a president, which could determine the very future of the American form of government.

The request is being made in a petition for writ of certiori, or a request for the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court, in a case brought on behalf of Col. Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force officer.

He is among the many who have brought court challenges to Obama's tenure in the Oval Office based on doubts about whether Obama qualifies for the position under the U.S. Constitution's demand that presidents be a "natural born citizen," a qualification not imposed on other many other federal officers.

The pleadings submitted to the court, compiled by longtime attorney John D. Hemenway, cite the incredible importance of the claims that Obama, in fact, failed to qualify for the office.

"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," states the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it continued.

The case made headlines at the district court level because of the ruling from District Judge James Robertson of Washington.

In refusing to hear evidence about whether Obama is eligible, Robertson wrote in his notice dismissing the case, "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court."

Besides the sarcasm involved, the pleading states, the very evidence pertinent to the dispute at issues was ignored.

The pleading outlines that information, which challenges Obama's claim to eligibility and his campaign's citation of a computer-generated Certification of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii, a document also made available to those not necessarily born in the state, as proof of Obama's eligibility.

It suggests there are "sufficient allegations" that Obama was not born inside the United States, and outlines the law and regulations in force at the time of Obama's birth, in 1961.

"At the time of the birth of the respondent Obama in 1961 as alleged, Congress had … the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952. Under the applicable provision of that act … for the respondent Obama to have been a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth, were he born of one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent, as he has alleged throughout his political career he was, his mother would have had to have been continuously resident in the United States for a period of 10 years preceding the date of his birth and, most importantly, she would have had to have resided continuously for five years preceding his birth in the United State after she had turned 14 years old. Since she was only 18 when Obama was born, this condition was clearly not fulfilled," the arguments said.

It also raised the suggestion that there are sound arguments to the effect that a "natural born citizen" is someone born to two citizen parents, and Obama himself has documented that his father never was a citizen of the U.S.

The fact that the evidence never was reviewed and the judge based a "biased" decision on "a completely extrajudicial factor" [twittering], prevented Hollister from having the constitutional rule of law applied, the petition states. .

"A further example of this bias based on extrajudicial factors by the district court was its observation that a lawyer associated with the initiation of petitioner Hollister's case, a prominent Democrat in Pennsylvania who backed Hillary Clinton in her successful primary there against respondent Obama, though never admitted in the case, was 'probably' the 'real plaintiff' in the case and that he and another lawyer who signed filings but was also never admitted … were 'agents provocateur' whose efforts to raise the issue of the respondent Obama's constitutional eligibility in lawsuits were a crusade in which the petitioner Hollister was a dupe," the petition says.

The questions suggested by the petition are weighty:
  • "Did the district court examine the complaint, as required by the decisions of this and every other federal court, to see if it alleged facts to support its claims?"
  • "By refusing to consider the issue of defendant Obama not being a 'natural born citizen' as set out in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, did the district court violate its obligations to consider the issues raised by the complaint?"
  • "In … relying on extrajudicial criteria such as an assertion that 'the issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency' combined with an attack on petitioner … did the district court not engage in such obvious political bias and upon extrajudicial factors as to render its opinion void?"
  • "Did the … bias engaged in lead to a decision which ignored the law as set out above and as a result place the respondent-defendant Obama above that law and the rule of law in this country generally and threaten the constitutional basis and very existence of our rule of law?"
  • "Did the courts below not completely ignore the decisions of this court and the clear language of Rule 15 of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning amendments so as to compound its biased elevation of the defendant Obama above the rule of constitutional law?"
While the district judge dismissed the case because it had been "twittered," the appeals court simply adopted his reasoning, but wouldn't even allow its opinion affirming the decision to be published, the petition explains.

...continued at WND here; http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=233177

Washington Times: SCOTUS; Kerchner v Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari scheduled for Conference... - More details here.

Attorney Taitz files Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court for Captain Rhodes/Taitz v. Colonel MacDonald/Obama, et al... - More details here.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

HOLLISTER v SOETORO (APPEAL) - PETITION filed [1241041] by Appellant - Petition - Transport Room
Col Hollister v. Soetoro/Obama Appeal - Motion to Recuse - Case: 09-5080 - 5/31/2010
Obama Ineligible - I tried and lied but it won't go away! Wash Times Natl Wkly 2010-11-08 pg 5



Follow ORYR by Email

 
Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records. Design by Wpthemedesigner. Converted To Blogger Template By Anshul Tested by Blogger Templates.