I linked to this research sometime back but it is well worth repeating to remind people that document fraud runs deep in the Obama family. The question remains how long before the house of cards comes crashing down?
In response to a Freedom of Information Request (FOIA) to the Social Security Administration for the release of Stanley Ann Dunham's ( Obamas mother ) application for a Social Security card ( the SS-5 form ), the following was released ) :
There is conclusive evidence that this is a forgery.
Evidence
Look at the following two forms. The first one is the FOIA request released by Social Security. The second is another form filled out in 1959 ( the same year Dunhams was supposedly filled out )
Dunhams SS-5 form supposedly filled out in 1959
Actual SS-5 form from 1959
Now at the bottom of Dunhams SS-5 form , it can clearly be seen that the form was Revised on 7/65 . That is quite a task as seeing that she signed the form in 1959. More on that below.
The forms look almost the same. There are just a few minor differences. They are noted in red on the forms. Basically what they did was just switch the locations of those two areas on the forms. Unless you were looking very closely, those 2 forms would look identical. Someone not paying attention would think the 1965 form was the 1959 form.
Some enhancements of the Revised statement on the Dunham form. It is clearly 7/65... ...Continued in Scribd document embedded below. Source.
Irrefutable Proof Obama's Mother's Social Security Number Application Fraudulent
Interview: Document & Scanner Expert Douglas Vogt Explains Criminal Complaint Filed with FBI Charging Obama with Document Fraud. -Video here.
Here's three articles explaining the criminal complaint that scanner expert Doug Vogt filed with the FBI. Part 3 here. Part 2 here and Part 1 here.
Busted: White House Now Claims They Ordered Short-Form COLB From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008 Yet COLB Is Date Stamped 2007 -Details here.
Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here.
Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here.
Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here.
Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here.
Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here.
Detailed reports on Obama's SS# can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Yes Virginia-There is a Usurper in the White House-Obama Long Form BC Forged! Wash Times NW 20110516 pg 5
26 comments:
Uh....WTF?????
I am not understanding why his political opponents are not taking this information and running with it. The public is calling on them to do something and they act like they are afraid to take on Obummer. What is the deal here? Too hot to handle?
If you enlarge it you will see that the date of the revision was 7-55. This is consistent with other SS-5s found on the internet.
It was enlarged and it clearly looks to be a 6, not a 5 as you suggest.
And other SS forms are compared with it in the Scribd document.
http://www.trunews.com/listen_now.htm
(Paul Irey on Trunews......)
Tuesday June 14, 2011
Guest: Paul Irey
Topic: With over 50 years of experience, typographer Paul Irey conclusively proves the Obama birth certificate is a complete fraud
Related World Net Daily article "Obama doc is "proof"- of fraud"
Rob
I hope this is not an Obot developed misinformation and disinformation story and forged document. Does the person getting this SS-5 have a clear cut and documented set of records to prove how they obtained it and that it came directly for the SSA? The Obots have created many a phony document and red herring in the past. PJ Foggy brags about it in TheFogBow forum as was recently reported by WorldNetDaily.
"Anonymous" who said the revision date is 55, not 65, is a perfect example of the blind trust coming from diehard obama supporters. Doesn't matter that it's staring them right in the face. Regardless of how obvious the truth is, they see and hear something different from the truth. Seriously, it's like their under a spell or something. Woo woo.
"LETTER TO BARACK OBAMA, REQUESTING VOLUNTARY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO HIS ORIGINAL BC, STORED IN "HAWAII" BY DR. ORLY TAITZ"
www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22772
1) Republicans are afraid to be called racist, xenophobes and the like. Even Bill O'Reilly uses these tactics to stifle free speech and to attack anyone he wishes to use to make himself seem more intellectually superior.
2) Republicans don't want Obama to attack them with the power of his position.
3) Republicans want their own candidates to have a free road to the White House someday, i.e. Rubio, Jindal.
4) Republicans covered for Obama for so long they don't want their own cover blown. i.e. McCain says Obama is a nice young family man.
5) Republicans don't want to be out-gamed by Obama and made out to be a fool in front of millions of people. Trump helped Obama by looking like a total jackass for asking for the BC and having it shoved in his face. Trump turned out to be an impostor and working for Obama to discredit others who might call for documentation.
We are witnessing mafia-like thugacracy tactics every day in regard to this issue. There is real fear permeating everything when it comes to this stuff. Nobody wants to be the one that brings down Obama because they will be the next McCarthy. No one wants to be that figure in the history books. It's just easier to toast to the new Caesar and play golf with him.
Yeah, Since the koolaide drinkers have no facts they pump out disinformation and then call you nuts. Life must really suck for these folks to have nothing else. FOB
I want to see SAD's original passport application circa 1960 and immigration records prior to 1965...
Orly should place this letter as a full page address in the Washington Times to the Carnival Barker in Chief...
"Letter to Barack Obama, requesting voluntary consent for access to his original BC, stored in HI"
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=22772&cpage=1#comment-39475
No question the form shows the year of revision as being 1965 instead of 1955. Nice Alinsky try, but no cigar.
Now we know which tree this rotten apple fell from.
If we assume Obama does not have a valid BC, that gives him a motive for having a forged SSN. What would be the motive for Ann Dunham to have a forged SSN?? I can't see the date clearly I'll admit, but it baffles me as to why Ann Dunham would need to forge a Social Security Number when she could just walk down and apply for one?! Any ideas/ rational theories?
ELmo
I have a copy of that same SS application for Stanley Ann and it says revised 7-55. I copied mine off the internet and its stamped Webofdeception.com
This SSN 535-40-xxxx was issued in the State of Washington in 1959-1960. Don't believe me? Check it out yourself. Go to the Five-Digit Decoder at http://stevemorse.org/ssn/ssn.html.
50-Year Typographer And Document Expert Paul Irey Explains In Detail His Computer Analysis Of Obama's Fraudulent Birth Certificate
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/50-year-typographer-and-document-expert.html
@Anonymous
I enlarged the same WOD image and it still looks like 65 to me...
The Form SS-5 was revised in 1955 and then again in 1980 to comply with the new OMB standards set in 1977. There was no revision in 1965.
"The Form SS-5 was revised in 1955 and then again in 1980 to comply with the new OMB standards set in 1977. There was no revision in 1965."
And how do we know you ain't bullshittin'?
It "still looks" like a 65 yet the number was in the group issued in 1959 to 1960. How do you explain that?
"LETTER TO BARACK OBAMA, REQUESTING VOLUNTARY CONSENT FOR ACCESS TO HIS ORIGINAL BC, STORED IN "HAWAII" BY DR. ORLY TAITZ"
Distraction. JMHO.
Doesn't matter what the original looks like, is the copy legally certified?
Doesn't matter what that pdf looks like, is the copy legally certified?
No judge will let a challenge to the original record stand if Obama has a legally certified copy...but feel free to go over the edge with Obama's pied pipers!
On the other hand, here's a form that appears to have been revised in 1965 yet allegedly signed in 1959.
@Anonymous
"The Obots have created many a phony document and red herring in the past."
For me, it doesn't matter who obtained it and how. To me, the fact that anyone posted this obvious fraud of a record points to a larger 'undertaking' that appears to be taking place right in front of our faces....
For example: Two 'debossed seal' COLBs that corroborate the name 'U K L Lee' having appeared initially on white supremacist websites and then more recently on WND. Is the 44th president of the U.S. planting distractions and images of fraudulent records online to obfuscate this issue AND make his perceived political enemies look like racists? It appears to be possible. To me, this is the biggest story of all.
The more we know about 'planted' bogus records, the more we uncover the depths of this man's poison.
You are right though, Obot plants are right in front of our faces doing very, very bad things.
But, we are on to them now, eh?=)
@MissTickly
Turn the document images 180 degrees (or stand on your head while viewing them on your monitor) and the "debossed seals" become embossed seals. You have been fooled by an optical illusion.
One wonders why would Stanley Ann Dunham's SS card be forged? To place a verifiable signature of hers into the public record. Then you see it would match the signature on the LFBC and in the forged book copy in Hawaii Department of Health. Since SAD can't sign any documents created since she died they would have to re create her signature and a document history to verify it. That is: someone alive is signing for her and placing this document into the record would be the way to authenticate her signature as an 'existing' sample.
If what Rev. Manning says and Barry Soetoro was a CIA agent working for the American government in Pakistan then they can not "out" him and will go to great lengths to protect themselves by covering for him. The selective service registration under the name Obama is a fraud. Now there is nothing about Soetoro anywhere? Nothing, yet he went by that name for at least 2 decades. How does a gay coke fiend that dropped out of college in CA and then went to Pakistan with his rich boyfriend, end up going to Harvard paid for by Saudi royalty? He is accepted to Harvard after a large donation was received by them and Barack Obama was born. No records from Columbia can be found and no one that supposedly went to school with him remembers him? Maybe Rev. Manning is right, it makes sense. He was CIA with Al Qaeda as Barry Soetoro. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6tvti9um6k The trust mentioned as owning his house I think also was one pointed out as having a lot of shorts on American Airlines stocks on 9/11/2001 and made a bundle. Too many pieces to this puzzle not sure how they go together but anyway I organize them I do no like the picture they make.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.