 |
| ~ Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth - image source ~ |
Taitz v. Astrue - Motion to Strike / Answer to Amended Complaint(Taitz) - Obama Social Security Number Case...
Confirmed: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President -Details here.
Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach -Details here.
Attorney Mario Apuzzo: All presidents born after 1787, except for Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, met the “natural born Citizen” criteria. -Details here.
Commander Charles Kerchner: List of U.S. Presidents - Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud -Details here.
Jack Cashill Discusses Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants -Video here.
Previous reports on Taitz v Astrue can be found here. Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Obama & the Hawaii Department of Health and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Obama Forged Long Form Birth Certificate -Why Isn't Speaker Boehner Investigating? WTNW 20110620 pg 5
Obama Committed Draft Registration Fraud! Whose SSN is He Using? Wash Times Natl Wkly 20110502 pg 5
6 comments:
Apparently Leo Donofrio stayed in a Holiday Inn Express during a recent poker tournament...
US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court-precedent-states-that-obama-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/
What the Commie Fogblower opposition is thinking - Buttfly Bilderberg:
"What raicha said. This case is postured like Barnett v. Obama and that Purpura case where the pro se plaintiffs kept insisting that they were automatically entitled to a default judgment. When the government has answered, the sufficiency of service of process and timeliness of the answer are tested by motions practice, not by an entry of default. Orly, like the two 'baggers in the Joisey case, hasn't learned that.
Plus, she did not have sufficient service until late April -- I forget the exact date. The SSA's answer WAS timely. Even if the answer was late, under Rule 45 Orly still has to prove she is entitled to judgment, due to a subsection of that Rule that is specific to the federal government. So she has to do battle over the FOIA exemption(s) regardless of any technical default. She will lose that battle because the document she wants is not disclosable."
So Buttfly, SSA's social security applications are not "disclosable" to the public?? LoL. Yeah suurre... Obama's SSA application for SSN is above top secret since he doesn't have one for the CONnecticut SSN. They can't 'disclose' something that does not exist for Obama. RS
can anyone tell a simple lay person what any of this means ?
Can anyone explain what the SSA is supposed to be filing? What are dispositive motions that the judge referred to?
And what special rule about default is the fogbow guy talking about? I thought that default is default.
now does this mean case closed? i really don't understand...someone pleaselet me know.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.