Audio Revealed: Cook County Recorder of Deeds Office Confirms Tax fraud In Obama/Rezko Land Deal. VIDEO HERE
Background and Related Research By Albert Hendershot Can Be Found Here:
Al Hendershot @ The Obama Hustle
Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 03 Oct 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5
9 comments:
This guy does a great job in breaking this somewhat complicated issue down into a simple soundbite to expose the truth. Stuff like this is much easier to understand rather than a 2 page essay. Look how effective the video was at exposing ACORN. If we are going to break through to the overwhelming majority of USA citizens we need to have more of this stuff. We need to RECORD and VIDEO the conversations with our Congress people and law enforcement people when we question the SSN fraud and the forged birth certificate.
I think it would helpful for this site to show us the best way to do it...how do you best record a phone call? How do you post onto You Tube? Many don't know. What kind of questions do we ask? We need to get these frauds on record.
How does this confirm tax fraud? I think you are overreaching a bit. This fraud theory is too convoluted for the public to digest.
@Anonymous
"How does this confirm tax fraud?"
It doesn't. Listen to the phone call, even the clerk is confused and gives several different answers.
As much as I dislike Obama, this phone call proves absolutely nothing. Millions of property transactions take place every year. Many of us out here know how to read the legal descriptions on the deeds and mortgages. If you think there is truly something wrong why not just post copies of the deeds and mortgages and we can figure it out right along with you. Otherwise, I think you start looking like part of the misinformation campaign.
By the way, who is Michelle Patton listed as one of the owners?
“…even the clerk is confused and gives several different answers.”
Let’s recap the conversation:
“A piece of property is transferred to a warranty deed of trust and the transfer tax is paid.”
“Does the property still have to be assessed and taxed?”
“Absolutely”, says the Assessor’s Office.
Does the clerk sound confused?
Now if he had said “Let me be clear” – as you are equating this statement, made continuously by a person clearly confused, with this clerk, I could understand your misunderstanding. But in this instance I just have to blame it on you being an Obot.
@bn 6:53 I am definitely not an obot, but I spent several years of my life researching real estate transactions for a living. I wish I could see the actual docs so I could help explain it and fill in the blanks for everyone. Researching transactions using PINs is useless. This phone conversation and the article last week using the PINs was useless. I am suspicious of the guy writing the article because they say nothing. The deeds and mortgages and easements, satisfactions, that were recorded with the Register of Deeds are public record. I went to the site last week after the author put in a link. There is an up front fee to get copies, but I didn't see what they charge anywhere. It is painfully obvious to me that the author did not obtain copies of the docs or he would have used them for his argument. The second choice is he does not know what he is doing and does not know how to read legal descriptions. The third choice is he is part of Obama's misinformation tactics team to make people look silly.
There is virtually zero chance that an assessor would "forget" to tax a piece of land. They want to have as many chances to collect taxes as possible. The author, in my opinion, is not making a good argument. If he is correct, I would like to help make the case a strong case. But, you need to use the actual recorded documents to even start researching it. Preventing against real estate fraud is why all sorts of real estate records are public knowledge.
@bn
Listen to the recording again - the clerk says if the adjacent property has it's own PIN it has to be . The Obama/Rezko adjacent property does not have it's own PIN (it was part of a larger parcel that had a PIN), it was incorporated into the Obama's larger property and a new PIN was issued for the now larger property. The remaining portion of the property owned by Rezko was also assigned a new PIN.
The Obama property was placed in a trust, which is a normal estate planning practice. Al doesn't understand that.
@Anonymous
"There is virtually zero chance that an assessor would "forget" to tax a piece of land."
Al and the clerk are talking apples and oranges. The clerk is talking about a property with its own PIN that is incorporated into another property. Al is talking about a part of a larger parcel that is incorporated into an adjacent property. The small sliver of land never had it's own PIN.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.