New York State Board of Elections Website Blocking Access To Natural Born Citizen Requirements
By
Pixel Patriot
10/5/2011
Previous versions of the New York State Board of Elections website that listed the qualifications for the Presidential Candidates to be a Natural Born Citizen have not only been scrubbed, but their website has html source code embedded to prevent archiving and specifically coded to be excluded in archival sites such as the Way Back Machine.
 |
| (Robot Text – embedded in NY BOE website to thwart access to Natural Born Citizen reference) |
The Board of Elections website cites Article II Section 1 as the Constitutional authority for Presidential requirements; however the reference to Natural Born Citizen has been replaced with just “Born a citizen” and they do not list Clause 5 which was specifically included by the Framers as a strong check against dual allegiance and foreign influence for the Office of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief:
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE II SECTION I CLAUSE V
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The New York State Board of Elections regularly updates their website. And you can use an internet archive program called the Way Back Machine to see some of the previous versions of the Board of Elections website as it existed during various times in the past. However, not all of the previous webpages are available; and it is not due to broken links.
The Board of Elections is employing technology within the computer programming language that makes up the website to actively block someone from gaining access to the webpage that previously listed the Natural Born Citizen requirement for the Presidency.
"How can I have my site's pages excluded from the Wayback Machine?"
 |
| Natural Born Citizen Requirement - EXCLUDED |
 |
| Natural Born Citizen Requirement - EXCLUDED |
"The Internet Archive is not interested in preserving or offering access to Web sites or other Internet documents of persons who do not want their materials in the collection. By placing a simple robots.txt file on your Web server, you can exclude your site from being crawled as well as exclude any historical pages from the Wayback Machine.
Here are directions on how to automatically exclude your site. If you cannot place the robots.txt file, opt not to, or have further questions, email us at info at archive dot org:"
Here is the actual code extracted directly from the Board of Elections website as of Tuesday October 4th, 2011:
Rows 10-11
Here is the source code for the Presidential Candidate requirements:
Rows 111-115
The Internet Archive
"This webpage is no longer available", is the sentence familiar to you?
"This is no longer a problem since a complete archive for webpages is now available. Through the Internet Archive, you can retrieve expired webpages, trace the development of websites, and go back to events that have shaken the world."
Really
Additionally, previous versions of the Board of Elections website have also been “BLOCKED” and can’t be accessed from the Internet archive at the New Library of Alexandria, Egypt, which mirrors The Wayback Machine.
A closer examination of the exclusion policy reveals the typical response by the Internet Archive when having been made by a GOVERNMENT request:
Archivists will exercise best-efforts compliance with applicable court orders.
Beyond that, as noted in the Library Bill of Rights:
'Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of
their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.'
Therefore, according to the Internet Archive exclusion policy; if the New York State Board of Elections made a request to have webpages excluded that would block access to historical references to the term Natural Born Citizen as a requirement for Presidential candidates, the request should have been denied.
By removing the reference to Natural Born Citizen as a requirement for a Presidential candidate from the Board of Elections website, that in and of itself is indicative of a concerted attempt to mislead the voters. However, a directive had to have been issued to the person programming the website to implement a technological blockade specifically designed to thwart current and future attempts to gain access to any previous versions of the website that include the Natural Born Citizen reference; pointing to a cover-up and a broader conspiracy by the New York State Board of Elections.
This deceptive practice by the New York State Board of Elections is antithetical to Bill A04356, an ACT to amend election law in the State of New York. Introduced on February 2, 2011 by M. of Latimer in the 2011-2012 Regular Sessions in Assembly:
Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 3-106 of the election law, as amended by chapter 8 of the laws of 1978 and as redesignated by chapter 9 of the laws of 1978, is amended to read as follows:
1. (A) In addition to the powers and duties elsewhere enumerated in this article, the state board of elections, after public hearings, shall adopt a "fair campaign code" WHICH SHALL SET forth ethical standards of conduct for persons, political parties and committees engaged in election campaigns including, but not limited to, specific prohibitions against practices of political espionage and other political practices WHICH INVOLVE subversion of the political parties and process, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE MISREPRESENTATION OF THE CRIMINAL RECORD OR BACKGROUND, MORAL TURPITUDE, CHARACTER, VOTING RECORD OR OTHER SPECIFIC ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF A CANDIDATE, TO A POTENTIAL VOTER
N.Y. ELN. LAW § 6-122 Designation or nomination; eligibility, restrictions
p.171
“A person shall not be designated or nominated for a public office or party position who if elected will not at the time of commencement of the term of such office or position, meet the constitutional or statutory qualifications thereof”
It is obvious that the New York State Board of Elections is intentionally misleading the voters of New York for the purpose of subverting the Constitutional requirement for the Office of the President while also trying to cover their tracks at the same time.
The U.S. Constitution can only be changed through the amendment process.
The Board of Elections is currently a defendant in a case before the New York State Supreme Court brought by plaintiff Christopher-Earl Strunk, pro se.
For reference, here is the entire source code from the BOE website:
 |
| http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com |
36 comments:
Thought they could pull a fast one on us, eh? Can we use this Way Back Machine to push the reset button on the Zero as One Big Ass Mistake, America?
It never ceases to amaze me as to the depth of depravity and deceit these adolescent democrat fools have gotten. There is a "contact us" page, I'll do that. They are going to know we don't appreciate this crap.
Doesn't Trump live in New York? So, a major newspaper won't print/report this but he sure as heck could publish and make free to customers to his establishments this info as well as other facts. Quickest way to get the people to learn about these deceits.
Question: How are voters being misled if, as everyone knows, they learned in fifth grade civics that one must be born on the soil of two citizen parentS?
now they need to gather up all original copies of the constitution and burn them
@Anonymous
I've searched and I can't find either the word "two" or the word "parents" in the Constitution.
All that is left is burning the constitution, and no one would even notice. Guaranteed, it means nothing to most people these days.
@Anonymous
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
"The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first........"
Congressman John Bingham, “father of the 14th Amendment”, stated on the House floor with no objections:
“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” - (1862)
In 1866, Bingham stated again on the House floor with no objections:
"Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.....” - (1866)
E. Vattel, The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law, Sec. 212 Citizens and natives.
"The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights....."
Obama's Fightthesmears.com website admits Obama is not a natural-born Citizen.
“When Barack Obama, Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
its time for the REAL AMERICAN PEOPLE to stand together and make sure all these traitors pay for this crime. Obama seems to have picked his side today. i guess they want a civil war. If this is what they want, so be it! we need to hit them hard and all at once. we have a bunch of communists in our country that need to ether be wiped out or ran off. who are we fellow patriots, sheep or men?
"As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first........"
This. If you're going for the brass ring that is the presidency of the United States of America, you should have, and the Framers meant for you to have the most bona fide of bona fide citizenship possible: Born of two citizen parents.
If not you, who? If not now, when?
FJ
@Anonymous
FOGBLOW!
It's a no-brainer. We're going to have to go to the capitol whether we like it or not. We're going to have to show up in the millions. We have to understand this is not a protest. We go and stay until all the guilty are jailed. And that includes everybody in all three branches. I want them to know it's over. We do away with all useless alphabet federal administrations. I mean we really clean house. What to do about the military that, thus far, has betrayed us, I don't know. The brass has to be dealt with accordingly. One thing's for sure. Upon completion, there will be a cry of freedom the world has never heard. Can you imagine the U.S. free again? We've waited long enough. The time nears.
@Anonymousfightthesmears.com is clueless. Hawaii became a state in 1959, so if BHO was born there in '61, he is American-born. But being the son of a Kenyan citizen, he is NOT natural born.
@Anonymous
WHAT YOU DO FIND, IN THE CONSTITUTION , DUMMY, IS THE WORD NATURAL--AND IF ONE PARENT IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN--THEN THAT AMOUNTS TO A FOREIGN INGREDIENT IN THE OFF SPRING PRODUCED BY THE PARENTS---NOT NATURAL ---GET IT, FOOL?
@Anonymous writes: "I've searched and I can't find either the word "two" or the word "parents" in the Constitution."
Try searching for "natural born citizen"
Then see if you can find "naturalized citizen"
The founding fathers specifically stated the requirement to be a "natural born citizen" so that "naturalized citizens" would not be eligible for our office of the presidency. democraps and soetoro have trashed our constitution.
We don't need a civil war we just need the US Congress and the US Supreme to honor their oath to the US Constitution . That oath says I will protect and defend the US Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic . Obama and Holder are enemies of the US Constitution . Obama for not being US Constitutionally qualified to hold office and Holder for not enforcing US Constitutional law .
@Anonymous
Veterans March On DC Day
November 11, 2011
http://www.veterandefenders.org/DECLARATION-RESTORE-THE-CONSTITUTIONAL-REPUBLIC.pdf
Let's Roll!
McCain vs Senate 2008.
They have tried to chnge the NBC law for years ...
the NBC was settled McCain vs Senate 2008.
It's not just the left. Today Byron York at the Washington Examiner is ignoring the fact that Sen. Rubio is not a natural born citizen in writing about the push for Rubio as a VP candidate. The GOP members of the house voted to certify the electoral college results in 2008 despite the Impostor in Chief being an illegitimate candidate despite the Senate resolution on John McCain.
And now we have the FEC ruling that a naturalized citizen can run for president.
We as voters have no recourse as the courts abdicated its jurisdiction to election commissions and Congress while Congress and the election commissions claim it's for the courts to decide. In the mean time all cases questioning the legitimacy of Obama's legitimacy to hold office are being thrown out of court.
@Anonymous
.
The correct "spelling" is, natural born Citizen.
"Originally Posted by bluecat6
Now going beyond just ‘citizenship’ (a common term used by politicians). It is important to remember that the President [must] qualify as a ‘natural born Citizen.’ Note – no hyphen and a capital C, though this version of the actual Article II term is commonly misrepresented.
(note)The reasons I point out the lack of a hyphen and a capital C are more than just being anal re-tentative about legal wording. Many say that ‘natural born Citizen’ is not defined. I say it is defined as the framers intended. They did not create a formal term and leave it out of the document. ‘Citizen’ IS formally defined – THAT IS WHY IT IS CAPITALIZED. [A proper noun refers to "a specific entity or person," as opposed to "an unspecified member of a class of objects."] Any lawyer or paralegal or anyone who reads lots of contracts knows this. “Citizen” [meant] “a Citizen of one of the States.”
So what [about] ‘natural born’. Those are merely adjectives [or, rather, that is an adjectival or modifying phrase,] that narrow[s] what type of Citizen can be President. Using modern dictionaries, you can find what the founders intended – easily. ‘Natural’ can also be described as ‘inherent, not acquired; Having a particular character by nature; Not produced or changed artificially; not conditioned’. See here. ‘Born’ can be viewed as ‘from birth’ [or 'by birth' or 'according to birth']. Note ‘from birth’, not ‘at birth’ as often referenced.
So the definition and intent of the founders is abundantly clear. A ‘natural born Citizen’ is a Citizen who is a citizen only through inherent, standard, non-artificial means and has remained that way since birth."
(me): There were two classes of "Citizens" at that time.
State and Federal.
The word "Citizen" is used 11 times in the VII Articles of Our Constitution. (It is used 2x in the XI Amendment and 1x in The Declaration of Independence)
The word "citizen" (small cap "c") begins to appear in the 14th Amendment, Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. The word "citizen" is used 7x in the XXVII Amendments.
read: Slaughter House cases (appears just past half way down the page)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0083_0036_ZO.html
That its main purpose was to establish the citizenship of the negro can admit of no doubt. The phrase, "subject to its jurisdiction" was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.
Obama II was born a British subject inherited by his father.
Obama's father was never a u.s. citizen..............Dan Smith, NY
@FLotsam Jetsome\
The Framer who was the "Father of the Constitution" and the "Father of the Bill of Rights" didn't believe that.
"It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance.
Birth, however, sometimes derives its force from place, and sometimes from parentage; but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will
therefore be unnecesarry to examine any other."
Congressman James Madison, May 22, 1789
Both James Madison and Thomas Jefferson accepted honorary citizenship of the French Republic amd thus were dual citizens.
The Marquis de Lafayette and Winston Churchill accepted honorary American citizenship and thus were dual citizens as well.
In April 1793 Madison upon learning that he had been made an honorary French citizen, replied to Jean-Marie Roland, France's Minister of the Interior: "The artificial boundaries of nations,” he wrote, "could not divide the “great family of mankind.” .
@Anonymous
All of you Obots are idiots. The evidence is overwhelming what a natural born Citizen IS. Knock it off!
@Anonymous
@anonymous who wrote,"Both James Madison and Thomas Jefferson accepted honorary citizenship of the French Republic amd thus were dual citizens."
Madison was born in 1751.
Jefferson was born in 1723.
What part of Article II, section 1, clause 5 don't you understand [where] it states,", or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.
(AKA the Grandfather clause)
Dan, NY
@Dealio
Well Said!
@Anonymous
Jefferson and Madison's birth dates and grandfathering in as natural born citizens has nothing to do with their dual French citizenship which was offered and accepted when they were adults.
Give it up obuttlickers!!
@Anonymous
"a capital C"
That is an interesting analysis but Article 1, Section 8 Clause 5 reads "To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;" Is Money a proper noun? Why did they capitalize it? Why is Coin capitalized? In fact, there are a lot of words that are capitalized do they also have special meanings?
I looked at the handwritten copy of the Constitution but I could not find an instance where the Framers used a small "c" for citizen. Can you point me to the Article and the clause?
McCain vs Senate 2008.
barry soetoro is illegal.
@Anonymous
"Using modern dictionaries, you can find what the founders intended – easily."
The Framers did not have access to a modern dictionary. But they did have access to Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language published in 1768.
http://tinyurl.com/4y964xv
Neither Madison, Jefferson, Layfayette or Churchhill could be considered a dual citizen because they accepted "honorary" citizenship from an ally nation. There is a difference, such as an honorary degree does not make one a graduate of the bestowing college, neither does honorary citizenship make one a citizen of the bestowing country. It only an expression of gratitude and respect not a call for allegiance. While being born to parents who hold different citizenship, naturally bestows upon a child dual citizenship and dual allegiances which is the cause of concern. Of the four only Churchill may have had upon his birth had a claim to dual citizenship, if his mother had retained her citizenship. Then again his citizenship would be governed by the laws of the time.
Noway2no, Thank you.
?°HSI continues to be knowledgeable that when these fur objects have built it prior the border, Customs has small electric power to just take additional immediate action.
?°Labelling laws in Australia really are a tiny bit grey and we've got seen businesses cutting off tags saying ??made in China?¯ as well as Australian made tag put on it."
Where Customs and Border Safety has issues in regards to the import of fur products and solutions, supplemental documentation may well be sought through the importer to verify the naturel from the product or service. In conditions the place doubt exists regarding the authenticity of a product or documents, the importer may be required to provide a sample for tests by an proper qualified.
I am a natural born citizen from the State of New York. I wrote to the New York State Board of Elections expressing my displeasure with their definition of the eligibility requirements for President that were listed on their website in the summer of 2010. I have yet to hear any reply from them.
New York is becoming the Capital of the liberal cesspool of the United States. It disgusts me that they're having their way with the populist of the state without anyone trying to correct the idiotic, treasonist behavior. Looks like we have a loooong way to go Patriots!
Good day!
Happy New Year!
Health, luck and love!
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.