Monday, January 31, 2011

Hawaii: Formal complaint of election fraud against Lt. Gov. Brian E. Schatz, acting as Chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii; Investigate Now!

-Obama & Schatz-
Snippet via jbjd; If Barack Obama is not Constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President then, those members of the D party broke the law in 2008 who swore to state election officials he was, to get them to print his name on the ballot in those states that only print the names of candidates qualified for the job Many people who believe he is ineligible advocate we should shore up state election laws to forestall another round of fraud in 2012.  Meanwhile, others urge we should not let off the hook those members of the D party who fraudulently pulled off his election in 2008.

The problem of establishing candidate eligibility for office can be rectified on two fronts....

...For residents of HI, here are updated citizen complaints of election fraud for the State of Hawaii. Please, whether you have already filed a complaint, file this current updated one now. Note that Brian Schatz, formerly Chair of the Democratic Party of HI, is now the Lt. Gov. And the new AG, David Louie, only assumed office a couple of weeks ago. (Mr. Louie graduated from Occidental College, said to be one of Mr. Obama’s alma maters.)

Complete details here; http://jbjd.org/2011/01/29/aloha-obama-and-shalom

Full Text of the Complaint of Election Fraud:

MEMORANDUM of COMPLAINT of ELECTION FRAUD against LT. GOV. BRIAN E. SCHATZ, ACTING in a NON-GOVERNMENTAL ROLE as CHAIR of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY of HAWAII; and REQUEST for INVESTIGATION by the ATTORNEY GENERAL of HAWAII

To: David M. Louie, Attorney General of Hawaii
VIA FAX: 808.586.1239

From: [Hawaii Resident]

Subject: Complaint of Election Fraud against Lt. Gov. Brian E. Schatz, Acting in a Non-Governmental Role as Chair, Democratic Party of Hawaii; and Request for Investigation by the Attorney General of Hawaii

Date: January 29, 2011

Copies: Brian E. Schatz, Lt. Gov., State of HI (FAX: 808.586.0231)
Scott Nago, Chief, HI Office of Elections (FAX: 808.453.6006)
Dante Keala Carpenter, Chair, Democratic Party of HI
1050 Ala Moana Blvd., Suite D-26
Honolulu, HI 96814
William Marston, Chair, HI Election Commission
802 Lehua Avenue Pearl City, Hawaii 96782


PURPOSE OF CONTACT

This is a formal complaint of election fraud against Lt. Gov. Brian E. Schatz, acting in a non-governmental role as Chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii; and request for investigation of these charges by the Attorney General of Hawaii.

Specifically, under Hawaiian law, if the candidate for President of the United States (“POTUS”) from the major political party meets the federal requirements of the job, then election officials must print the candidate‟s name on the general election ballot. Under Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution, the POTUS must be a Natural Born Citizen (“NBC”). To get Barack Obama‟s name on the general election ballot in 2008, Mr. Schatz formally submitted to Hawaiian election officials a Certification of Nomination swearing that Mr. Obama was “duly nominated” as the candidate for POTUS for the Democrat Party and had met the legal qualifications for the job. Accompanying that letter was the official Certification of Nomination of the DNC Services Corporation (“DNC”), signed by the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, acting in her non-governmental role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Presidential nominating convention; and Alice Germond, Secretary of the Corporation. This DNC Certification contained the explicit words required by Hawaii law: the “candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” (DNC Rules also require the nominee must be Constitutionally qualified for the job.)

However, overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to the fact at the time Mr. Schatz signed and forwarded these Certifications neither he nor the DNC could have ascertained Mr. Obama is a NBC. And in Hawaii, swearing the Presidential nominee of the major political party is a NBC without ascertaining beforehand that he is, for the purpose of obtaining a place on the ballot, constitutes election fraud.

Citizens from Hawaii as well as from several other states, concerned that members of the DNC had submitted to state election officials these unauthenticated Certificates of Nomination, also contacted the DNC requesting to see the documentation on which they had based this Certification. Ms. Pelosi ignored all such requests. Claiming he was responding to requests that were directed to Secretary Germond, DNC General Counsel Joseph Sandler wrote, “The Democratic National Committee is not a state agency subject to the open records or freedom of information statutes of any state.” http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/09/20/the-cheese-stands-alone And, based on this fact that no law required him to produce the requested documentation; he chose not to produce this documentation. 

Such display of hubris by members of any political party confronted by citizens concerned as to the legitimacy of the electoral process prescribed by law, cannot be tolerated in our Constitutional Republic.

Candidates representing the Democratic Party may not participate in the election process carried out in the state of Hawaii on behalf of the citizens of this state unless they obey our rules. And if our state law is to operate as anything more than form with no function, the state must now compel this political party to produce the evidence that was the basis for its Certification to Hawaii election officials that Barack Obama, the party‟s nominee for President, satisfied those laws requiring the candidate to be qualified for the job. Absent such evidence, it appears that by certifying such qualification, Mr. Schatz has perpetrated election fraud on the citizens of Hawaii.


WHEREFORE, I request an immediate investigation by the Attorney General of Hawaii.

(Note: This Complaint takes no position on whether Mr. Obama is a NBC.)


RATIONALE

1. Under Hawaii law, only the nominee for POTUS from the major political party who has satisfied those Constitutional qualifications for office is entitled to have his or her name printed on the Hawaii general election ballot.

Hawaii Revised Statutes Title 2, Elections, Chapter 11

§11-113 Presidential ballots. … (c) All candidates for President and Vice President of the United States shall be qualified for inclusion on the general election ballot under either of the following procedures:

(1) In the case of candidates of political parties which have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:



(B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution;

(C) A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection.



Article II, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the POTUS must be a Natural Born Citizen. Thus, in order to satisfy federal requirements for POTUS that would entitle Mr. Obama‟s name to be printed on the Hawaii general election ballot, he must be a NBC.

2. On August 27, 2008 Brian E. Schatz, then Chair, Democratic Party of Hawaii, submitted 2 (two) separate Certifications of Nomination swearing Barack Obama, the D party candidate for POTUS, is a NBC, both of which Certifications he submitted to Hawaii elections officials so that they would print Mr. Obama‟s name on the Hawaii general election ballot.

Brian Schatz submitted to Hawaii elections officials 2 (two) documents with the heading, OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF NOMINATION. One Certification, dated August 27, 2008, bore the letterhead of the Democratic Party of Hawaii; the other, the letterhead of the DNC. In the first document, Mr. Schatz swore that Mr. Obama had been “duly nominated” as POTUS “by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention…” That is, he had been nominated in accordance with D party rules and procedures. (§11-113, (1)(C).) The second document, signed by then Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, The Honorable Nancy Pelosi, in her „civilian‟ role as Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, contained the line, he was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.” (§11-113, (1)(B).)

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/if-drowning-out-opposing-facts-is-un-american-then-ignoring-unpleasant-facts-must-be-un-american-too

The rules of the Democratic National Committee require the nominee must be eligible under the U.S. Constitution. http://s3.amazonaws.com/apache.3cdn.net/3e5b3bfa1c1718d07f_6rm6bhyc4.pdf (p.14, K.1 and 2). Article II, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the POTUS must be a Natural Born Citizen. Thus, Certifying Barack Obama was now the D party Presidential nominee was tantamount to verifying, he is Constitutionally qualified for the job, which means, he is a NBC.

State lawmakers failed to enact legislation that would require any state actor to check on the nominee‟s Constitutional eligibility. Thus, the express meaning of legislation requiring statements of candidate eligibility is clear: if the party gives us the name of its nominee for POTUS to be printed on the general election ballot and says, he is qualified to serve under the U.S. Constitution then, we must assume the party has determined its nominee is Constitutionally qualified for the job.

3. Mr. Schatz could not have ascertained Barack Obama is a NBC at any time prior to August 27, 2008, the date on the letter accompanying the Official DNC Certification of Nomination submitted to Hawaii election officials verifying he was a qualified candidate given the fact at this same time, the nominee insisted the evidence proffered to establish his Constitutional qualification for POTUS “prove[d]” he is only a “native citizen” but not a NBC.

Explicitly acknowledging public doubts whether he is a NBC, in June 2008 Mr. Obama, still just a candidate for the Presidential nomination of the Democratic Party, created and paid for a web site entitled, “Fight the Smears” (“FTS”), on which he posted a photocopy of a document entitled, “Certification of Live Birth” (“COLB”) from the State of HI. http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate Mr. Obama proclaimed this photocopied and redacted Certification proves he is a “native citizen of the United States of America.” (While the actual title that appears within the document identifies this is a “Certification,” Mr. Obama wrote underneath the image, this is his “Official Birth Certificate.”)

(Note: While the text of FTS pertaining to Mr. Obama‟s qualification for POTUS remains the same, the accreditation in the footer changes. In the original version, the footer read, “Paid for by Barack Obama 2008.” Subsequently, the footer was altered to read, “Paid for by Obama for America”; which was then changed to read, “Paid for by Organizing for America, a Project of the Democratic National Committee.” This remains its current iteration. Also, at various times, the site address appeared as either a .com or, a .org. These changes in accreditation correspond exactly to the mandates of the U.S. Code, thus rendering this FTS web site a paid political advertisement. See DE-CODER RINGS (1 of 2) and (2 of 2).)

4. Mr. Schatz could not have ascertained Barack Obama is a NBC prior to August 27, 2008, the date the Official DNC Certification of Nomination was submitted to Hawaii elections officials verifying he was a NBC based on that internet COLB given the fact that 4 (four) months later, in January 2009, Defendant Obama repeated in pleadings he submitted to the federal court, the best evidence he was born in HI is the original document of that altered FTS COLB; yet he failed to submit this „original‟ COLB to the Clerk of the Court to be marked up as evidence and made a part of the official court record.

In January 2009, Mr. Obama, then President-elect, was the named Defendant in a case filed in federal district court, ostensibly seeking to determine whether the Uniform Code of Military Justice required a military Plaintiff to obey orders from a Commander in Chief he was not certain was a NBC. (Pleadings for Hollister v. Soetoro, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR, can be found on line at http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts.) Mr. Obama submitted a Motion to Dismiss* predicated on Plaintiff‟s failure to establish the Court's jurisdiction; and to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (The Defendant was represented by Attorney Robert F. Bauer of PERKINS COIE LLP, now White House Counsel, who signed the pleadings submitted to the court on his client‟s behalf.) Additionally, Mr. Obama asked the court to take judicial notice of the following „fact‟: he had publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. (Presumably, he used the phrase “publicly produced” referring to the fact, he posted that photocopied COLB on his FTS campaign web site.) Yet Defendant did not provide the court with the „original‟ COLB so that the Clerk could mark up the document as evidence and place it in the case record (where it would be subject to scrutiny by the Plaintiff or the judge‟s in-camera inspection). Instead, he tried to authenticate that internet COLB just by asking the court to take “notice” that Annenberg Political Fact Check (“APFC”) “conclude[d] that the birth certificate is genuine.” Id. (APFC is one of many such organizations wholly funded by the Annenberg Foundation, which also paid Mr. Obama‟s salary as Chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge from 1995-1999.) (And recall he wrote on FTS, this COLB only establishes he is a “native citizen,” anyway.)

*Technically, by incorporating into Defendant‟s Motion to Dismiss, another Motion for Judicial Notice of Evidence, Mr. Bauer was prima facie converting what was captioned Defendant‟s “Motion to Dismiss,” into a “Motion for Summary Judgment.” Fortunately, The Honorable Judge Robertson only granted Defendant‟s Dismissal, without judicial notice of the nativity claims visible on the FTS electronic advertising platform. For further explanation, see IDIOMS!

Given the fact that being Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives made convention Chair Pelosi 3rd in line of Presidential succession, with all of the gravitas incorporated therein, it defies credulity that in order to establish his bona fides for the job Mr. Obama would seek judicial notice of the lesser fact APFC says he is a native; but not offer into evidence the DNC Official Certification of Nomination Ms. Pelosi had submitted to election officials in the state of HI, swearing he is “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution,” meaning, he is “Natural Born”; or any one of the dozens of her signed Certifications, which persuaded election officials throughout the country to print his name next to the D on the Presidential ballots in the 2008 general election.

Eschewing reliance on Ms. Pelosi‟s Certification, incredibly, Mr. Obama asked the court to take judicial notice of this information: APFC “note[d] a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper.” In fact, APFC had only posted on their web site an image of an unattributed „newspaper announcement,‟ which phantom image they admitted they had usurped from the TexasDarlin (“td”) blog, where it was posted anonymously. With no further investigation into that „announcement,‟ APFC declared, “The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.” http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html) (Note: Without notice, APFC subsequently redirected that suspect “td” link to the web site of a Hawaiian newspaper that has ceased publication. See OBAMA TRIES to WIPE SLATE CLEAN for 2012 RUN; and http://jbjd.org/2010/12/19/obama-cleans-slate-2012-run/comment-page-1/#comment-3433.) Like APFC, Defendant Obama omitted the name of this HI publication from court pleadings and failed to enter into the court record any physical evidence of a newspaper announcement, thus making his claims there was such an announcement, as with his claims the internet COLB was real, impossible to verify, too.

5. Mr. Schatz could not have ascertained Barack Obama is a NBC prior to August 27, 2008, the date on the Certification submitted to Hawaii elections officials verifying he was a NBC given the fact that as of August 2009, a year after submitting this Certification, the DNC advertised Mr. Obama is a “native citizen” but not a NBC.

A Google ad appearing on the internet in August 2009 asks this intriguing question followed by the answer: “Where was Obama Born? The President was Born in Hawaii. Learn More! www.FightTheSmears.com .” http://pages.suddenlink.net/tristanne/turks.png

Following the link provided in the ad takes you to a version of FTS which, according to the attribution in the footer, is “Paid for by Organizing for America, a Project of the Democratic National Committee.” Again, the FTS site only claims Mr. Obama is a native, not a NBC. And, again, the web site displays the image of that Certification which Mr. Obama had only described but not provided to the court thereby eliminating the possibility of an „in-camera‟ inspection.


CONCLUSION

Hawaii law requires candidates for public office whose names appear on any election ballot must be qualified for the job. In 2008, officials of the Democratic Party Certified to Hawaii election officials Barack Obama was Constitutionally qualified for the job of POTUS, causing these officials to print his name on the 2008 general election ballot. But the scant evidence available in the public record at the time of this Certification failed to establish he is a NBC (or even that he is a citizen). Citizens concerned the Democratic Party Certified Mr. Obama‟s qualifications without verification asked the party to disclose the basis for their Certification. The party said, „No.‟ Therefore, the AG must now intervene on behalf of these citizens to investigate these charges of election fraud. -end-


All filers, old and new, make sure to read and understand the complaint before signing with real names and addresses, and sending. http://jbjd.org

Download and print here, also embedded below. Complete Details: http://jbjd.org/2011/01/29/aloha-obama-and-shalom
jbjd
2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nomination for Presidential Candidates -

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Hannity gives green light: Questions that Bill O’Reilly should ask the usurper, Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Hussein Obama on Superbowl Sunday

- The Pillars of Good Journalism: Thoroughness, Accuracy, Fairness and Transparency - Give Us Liberty -

Sadly, FOX News led by the pompous, self-righteous and arrogant Bill O’Reilly have failed and actually betrayed the American people when it comes to upholding these pillars of Good Journalism. This is especially true as it relates to the USURPATION of the presidency of the United States and the sham court-martial, conviction and imprisonment of U.S. Army LTC Terrence Lakin.

-BillOReilly.com-

“FOX News: Fair and balanced”

- WE THINK NOT -

HERE ARE THE QUESTIONS THAT BILL O'REILLY SHOULD ASK THE USURPER, BARRY SOETORO, AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA ON FEB. 6, 2011, SUPERBOWL SUNDAY


1. Mr. Obama, all American presidents have had their birthplaces established and commemorated. Mr. Obama, why is there no effort to commemorate your place of birth? After all, isn’t reasonable to expect your supporters would want to make a public event and establish your place of birth? This would serve an obvious historical purpose but more importantly would help put to rest many of the questions from millions of Americans who sincerely doubt your birth narrative.

2. Did you write a letter to Kapi’olani Hospital just four days after the presidential inauguration stating that Kapi’olani was the place of your birth? I ask because numerous phone, email, and in-person verification requests have been made and the hospital refuses to verify the authenticity of the letter.

3. Why Mr. Obama, for more than 2 years, have you employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate long form birth certificate, college records, medical records and numerous other bona fides? And as a follow-up, why are you using American taxpayer’s money to do so? Do you think that this fair, especially in light of the public’s continued outcry against big government, irresponsible spending, and excessive waste? Will you reimburse the American citizens?

4. Mr. Obama you have represented that you taught Constitutional law for twelve years before you entered politics. One must assume that you have a pretty fair understanding of the basic concepts set down by the Founding Fathers. And I think it fair to assume that you must know what the constitutional requirements for president are. Mr. Obama would you please tell me the definition of “natural born citizen” as intended by the Founding Fathers in Article 2, Section 1, as defined by Emmerich de Vattel in “The Law of Nations”? Also could you distinguish “native born citizen” from ”natural born citizen” and please tell me what is meant by “naturalized citizen”? Which are you and where is your proof for the American people?

5. Mr. Obama, you have stated that you are the son of a Kenyan “goat-herd” named Barrack Hussein Obama. Was your father ever an American citizen?

6. Do we have proof that the various Certifications of Live Birth, i.e., the COLBs that were placed on the internet by your surrogates in the summer of 2008 were in fact issued by the State of Hawaii? Isn’t the COLB as Lou Dobbs stated, just a piece of paper that refers to another piece of paper? Is it possible to get a COLB and not been born in Hawaii? For example, it is common knowledge that Sun Yat-sen, the famous Chinese revolutionary who was actually born in China had a COLB issued by the state of Hawaii. Mr. Obama will you concede that the various versions of the COLB which have only been shown as digital images and proven to be fraudulent are NOT your long form birth certificate and thus lack most of the ESSENTIAL and VITAL information necessary to determine your eligibility to run for the office of president of the United States? And, why sir have you continued to keep silent for more than two years hiding behind this digital image with scant information and fraudulent origins; a document so bogus and obviously ill-conceived that it has your father’s race listed as African?

7. Your friend, Neil Abercrombie, now governor of Hawaii, has created such a stir lately claiming that he was determined to provide positive proof to the American people that you were in fact born in Hawaii. He has since backtracked claiming that he was legally prohibited from doing so. Mr. Obama, if Mr. Abercrombie called you today, would you authorize the release of your BC or whatever birth records are claimed to be on file in Hawaii? By the same token, why don’t you just produce the birth certificate that you reference on page 26 of your life narrative, “Dreams of My Father.” In fact, you wrote: “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.” Sir, this would have been in the mid 70’s, so your certificate certainly would not have been computer generated. Mr. Obama why not produce it and put the issue to rest? You claimed that you would be the most transparent administration and it has been quite frankly just the opposite. Mr. Obama, how can the American people trust you if they don’t know who you are?

8. Mr. Obama, you lived in Indonesia when you were a young boy. You were adopted by your stepfather Lolo Soetoro correct? Isn’t it true that you became an Indonesian citizen? As such, how and when did you reacquire American citizenship? Were you naturalized? If so, where and under what circumstances?

9. And isn’t it true Mr. Obama that your name was legally changed to Soetoro, i.e., you were known as Barry Soetoro when you were a young boy and even when you returned to the United States and went off to college? If that is true, then when did you have your name legally changed back to Barack Obama? Also, why did your father spell his first name with two “r’s” and you only one? As a follow-up, it is my understanding that your name change would have required the state of Hawaii to issue a revised birth certificate listing Soetoro as your last name. Isn’t that correct? So Mr. Obama, what is your legal last name as we sit here right now and can you offer the American people proof as such?

10. On your Illinois state bar application you indicated that you had never been know by any other names other than Barack Obama. That was not a true statement was it? Also, isn’t it true that you are no longer a licensed attorney in any jurisdiction of the United States? Why is that? Why on earth would you give up your license to practice law?

11. Mr. Obama, recently it was discovered that your Selective Service card may have been doctored. Federal law requires all American males to register for the Selective Service (the draft) in case a major war broke out. Blogger, Debbie Schlussel, has discovered solid evidence that your Selective Service registration form was submitted not when you were younger as required, but rather in 2008 and then altered to look older. Indeed, the forgers forgot to alter the “Document Location Number” which shows that it is clearly a 2008 form. This is fraud and it’s a felony and these allegations are backed up by Stephen Coffman, a former high-ranking Federal agent. Moreover, the document shows a September 4, 1980 date and the location of the transaction as Hawaii, but at that time you, Mr. Obama, were thousands of miles away attending Occidental College in Los Angeles. Is the real reason why you did not submit this form as a teenager is that you assumed that your, Kenyan, British, or Indonesian citizenship exempted you from this requirement? Also, isn’t it true that as you grew older and entered politics, you saw that any documents which reflected a foreign birth or foreign citizenship – e.g., Selective Service registration, birth certificate, school applications, passport records, etc., would be problematic if you ran for political office, especially a run at the highest office in the land, the U.S. presidency?

12. Mr. Obama it appears that you have multiple identities in terms of possessing numerous social security numbers. Orly Taitz, an attorney who has filed numerous suits against you challenging your eligibility to serve as president, appears to be the first to discover this. In her suit, representing a number of military officers who are refusing to serve under an ineligible commander in chief, she hired private investigators to conduct research on your prior addresses and Social Security numbers. The investigations revealed that there were at least 25 Social security numbers connected with your name. In your home state of Illinois, the investigation revealed 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042 and one starting with 364.

In California, where you attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for you, all within easy driving distance of the college. There are no addresses listed in New York where you purport to have attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for you in nearby Jackson, New Jersey, with a Social Security number beginning with 485. All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names and spellings you will find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers. Finally, the one Social Security number most frequently used by you, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of you having lived or worked in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period you would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time. There is even more evidence of you and your wife having associations with other states as it relates to possible identity fraud.

Mr. Obama, what is going on here? According to investigators, those who create additional Social security numbers are typically engaged in criminal activities such as Social security fraud, welfare fraud, tax fraud, real estate fraud, campaign contributions fraud, voter fraud and so on. I should also note that your grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people. Why would YOU obtain so many Social security numbers? Even your wife, Michelle has more than one Social Security number? Mr. Obama an explanation is in order. This is serious and the American people deserve an explanation.

13. Looking for evidence of your past, FOX News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period 1981 to 1983 when you claim to have been a student there. The problem is Mr. Obama, none remember you. For example, Wayne Allyn Root was, like you, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root said of you, “I don’t know a single person at Columbia who knew him [Obama], and they all know me. I don’t have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia. Ever! Nobody recalls him. I’m not exaggerating, I’m not kidding.” Root also adds that he was also, like you sir, “Class of ’83 political science, pre-law” and further says, “You don’t get more exact or closer than that. And I never met him in my life and don’t know anyone who ever did. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack or Barry Obama! And five years ago nobody even knew who he was.” Mr. Obama, your photograph does not appear in any of the yearbooks. In short, no one at Columbia remembers you. Mr. Obama, did you attend Columbia University during this time and did you graduate in 1983? At a minimum could you produce your diploma for the American people to see? Isn’t that a reasonable request?

14. From 1979 to 1981 you attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, Columbia University supposedly from 1981 to 1983, and then Harvard University from 1988 to 1991. Where did you obtain the funding to attend these prestigious and expensive schools? Did you get loans? Did you in fact purport to be a foreign student at anytime while in college and thereby receive foreign aid? Is that the real reason why we are not allowed see your school records and financial aid applications?

15. Why did you state in 2007 on Preliminary Presidential Preference Primary Nomination forms that you were a natural born citizen while a year later after you were nominated by the DNC, Nancy Pelosi signed the subsequent Nomination Form but removed any and all language as to your constitutional qualifications in the forms that went to 49 of the 50 states? Mr. Obama, it appears that the DNC perpetuated a massive fraud on the American electorate and you sir signed off on these forms. What say you, Mr. Obama?

16. Do you feel that LTC Terrance Lakin, now in prison in Leavenworth, Kansas because he wanted proof from you, Mr. Obama, that you were in fact a lawful and legitimate commander-in chief, was given a fair trial? After all Lakin was not allowed to present any evidence or witnesses on his own behalf? And on a personal note: Mr. Obama, what legitimate commander-in chief of the armed forces would simply ignore an officer's respectful and thoughtful letter to him and allow him instead, to be court martialed, dishonorably discharged, stripped of all his benefits including pension and health care and incarcerated just because that CIC refused to allow him to see his bona fides? Because Mr. Obama that is precisely what you did to LTC Lakin, a man who had served with honor for 18 years in the U.S. Army both as a soldier and a medical doctor. Mr. Obama, doesn't everyone in the military deserve to know that you are not an imposter?

17. Legislation in Arizona to require presidential candidates to prove their eligibility to run for POTUS has just been introduced. It looks like it will pass sometime this spring. Other states are expected to follow suit and more than a 100 electoral votes will be in play in these states. Mr. Obama, how can you run for re-election if you are not allowed to be on the ballot in one or more of these states? Also, given the fact that you refuse to produce your long form birth certificate AND given the latest news that the State of Hawaii says - after two years of obfuscation and lies - that they DO NOT have your birth certificate, this begs the question sir: What proof, i.e., what documentation did you provide the DNC in 2008 to establish your constitutional eligibility to run for POTUS? Why can we not see this documentation now?


BONUS QUESTION
Mr. Obama, my final question, though rather lengthy, covers a lot of ground and I believe inquiring minds would very much like a clarification and a chance to set the record straight. Mr. Obama, you are a lawyer or you were at one time. No doubt you are familiar with the various tools for obtaining discovery. For example, I am sure that you understand what RFA’s or Request for Admissions are. Correct? For our viewers let me explain that request for admissions (sometimes also called a request to admit) are a set of statements sent from one litigant to an adversary, for the purpose of having the adversary admit or deny the statements or allegations therein. Requests for admissions are part of the discovery process in a civil case. In September 2008, you failed to respond or even object for that matter to a series of 56 RFAs which were served upon you by attorney, Phil Berg, as part of his Federal lawsuit challenging your constitutional eligibility to be POTUS. Mr. Obama, you completely ignored them. No response was filed by you by way of a either a response or an objection! Why on earth would you allow that to happen? You do understand Mr. Obama that when you failed to timely respond to Mr. Berg, the allegations are deemed admitted by law, and one cannot be permitted at time of trial to introduce evidence that would controvert the deemed admission. In effect, Mr. Obama, under the Federal Rules of Procedure, you are on record as having ADMITTED to the statements which I have on this sheet of paper. I will hand you the list and I willthen read out loud the first 10 for our viewers to give the flavor as to the type of questions that were asked. All 56 are being posted simultaneously on the screen for our TV viewers. Mr. Obama what say you? Why would you not object or respond to these? Did you know the case was going to be thrown out? Perhaps we could take the time right now and give you the opportunity to respond. You have the opportunity right now Mr. Obama to state on the record, before millions of Americans and millions more around the world, your answer to each and every one of these allegations. We can do it relatively quickly Mr. Obama, as they are basically the equivalent of true or false questions. Wouldn’t you agree that this would be most beneficial and serve to alleviate some of the doubts about your background? After all the American people cannot trust their leaders if they don’t have the basic knowledge as to who they are. Shall we begin?


[You are to ADMIT or DENY]

1. I was born in Kenya.

2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen.

3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.

4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.

5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.

6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.

7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery.

8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.

9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.

10. I was not born in Hawaii.

11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.

12. I was not born at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.

13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.

14. I am a citizen of Indonesia.

15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.

16. I am not a “natural born” United States citizen.

17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.

18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends.

19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.

20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens.

21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country.

22. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.

23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.

24. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a “natural born” United States Citizen.

25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.

26. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.

27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.

28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.

29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.

30. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.

31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.

32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.

33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.

34. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed.

35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.

36. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.

37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.

38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.

39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Kenya.

40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.

41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth.

42. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.

43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen.

44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means.

45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii.

46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.

47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments for illnesses.

48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

50. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.

51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama.

52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.

53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.

54. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law.

55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office.

56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.

By giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com -End-

Note: On 1/27/2011, Sean Hannity on Fox News gave Bill O'Reilly the green light to ask for Obama's bona fides.


Obama, Megyn, Bill, Honolulu, Hawaiian COLB - FightTheSmears -
Obama Ineligible/Support LTC Terry Lakin - Wash Times Natl Wkly 2011-01-10 2 Pg Ctr Fold-pgs 20&21

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Scam Alert: Analysis on Hawaii HB1116; To what lengths will Obama and his accomplices in Hawaii go to cover up the fraud perpetrated by Obama...

- A comment from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the proposed new Hawaiian law HB1116 regarding issuing "copies of birth certificates" for people of "civic prominence", i.e., Obama. -

I see some weasel word "cop-outs" for the Hawaii Health Dept as to what they will provide for the $100 fee in the wording of that proposed new law, HB1116. I see a bait and switch law in process in that one will not get what is really desired via this proposed new law. I don't see anything in the words that say the $100 fee would entitle the applicant to get a certified true and correct copy of the original, typed long-form contemporaneous birth certificate from the 1961 birthing facility or the 1961 birth registration document if done by a member of the family. As I read that proposed HB1116 law it would simply allow an applicant for the payment of $100 to get a so called copy of the "birth certificate" of the "person of civic prominence" which in the eyes of the Hawaii Health Department would simply mean the applicant would get a computer generated copy of the "Certificate of Live Birth" which is merely a renamed and slightly enhanced version of the "Certification of Live Birth" that were issued prior to Hawaii changing the law at the end of 2008. So people in the general public could now order a Certificate of Live Birth (aka Birth Certificate) for a person of civic prominence instead of just people with a "tangible interest". I do not read in that law the granting of powers to allow the public to get certified true and correct copies of the original birth registration documents and any amendments to the birth vital records file, if any.

Further contacts and inquiries to the Hawaiian legislators proposing this new law needs to be made to clarify exactly what type document they consider a "birth certificate" under this new law ... copy of the original long form or a computer generated newly developed "Certificate of Live Birth" printed out off the birth registration database by a computer. If that is the case we once again will be dealing with the Garbage in Garbage Out (GIGO) type document that is not a copy of a contemporaneously generated 1961 document with signatures and names of witnesses to a birth.

I see in this proposed law just another "placebo" and diversionary law in the works to make it look like Hawaii is going to give the millions of people what they want to see ... copies of the original, typed long-form birth registration records to see who filed them and what they contain, and any amendments made to those records since the original registration was filed. To what lengths will Obama and his accomplices in Hawaii go to cover up the fraud perpetrated by Obama and his enablers as to Obama's true legal identity in the 2008 presidential election. See here for more on what likely happened in 1961 in regards to Obama's birth being registered as occurring in Hawaii when he likely was not born there.


CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
www.ProtectOurLiberty.org
#####

FLASHBACK: - Hawaiian Law Demands Obama's records be made public - Hawaii officials are breaking Hawaii law in not disclosing how they came to the public declarations made on October 31st, 2008 and July 27th, 2009. The hole Hawaiian officials had dug themselves with these declarations is deep, and there is no legal ladder out, other than to make public the resources and information they used in order to come to their conclusions. -Details here.

- Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes - According to law, the State of Hawaii must now disclose how it came to the decision that is found in Director Fukino’s July 27th Press Release that was approved by the State’s Attorney General. Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-4 states very clearly that formal opinions of the Attorney General must be made public. Further, the Hawaiian Office of Information Practices in 1991 formally set out the requirements that informal opinions of the AG must also be made available for public inspection. According to Donofrio, under the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Rule 510): “when the conclusions of an informal Attorney General opinion are made public by the agency/client, then the accompanying record of that opinion must also be disclosed to the public:” -Full report here.

- HI Officials Don’t Like Questions; Stats In; Complaint Filed; Attorney: Questions OK -More here and more archived reports at the Right Side of Life here.

- HI Director of Department of Health Perjures Herself before HI Senate Committee - STATEMENTS SEEN AS ATTEMPT TO DEFEND HERSELF AND DEPARTMENT FROM INQUIRIES REGARDING CONFLICTING PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON OBAMA’S VITAL RECORDS. -Details here.

- HI Department of Health Publicly rebuffs inquiries for Obama’s vital records - DOSSIER OF EXCUSES APPEARS ON WEB IN LAST 6 HOURS? -Details here.

- HI Department of Health refuses OIP’s request - THAT THEY DISCLOSE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS BY DEC. 21st. -Details here. -Complete archive of reports on the Hawaii DOH from the Post & Email can be viewed here.

- TerriK INVESTIGATION – PART 1: Hawaii Department of Health Directors(fmr) Fukino and Okubo Are Guilty of Misdirection -Details here.

TerriK INVESTIGATION, PART 2: OIP Staff Attorney Linden Joesting’s Response to TerriK’s Appeal Appears To Confirm That The DoH Maintains Amended Vital Records For pResident Obama. -Details here.

TerriK INVESTIGATION, Part 3: Hawaii AG Mark Bennett Approved Fukino’s Natural-Born Citizen Statement; All Records Should Be Made Public According To Law. -Details here.

- DoH Reverses Course – Releases Index Data For pResident Obama, Stanley Ann and Barack, Sr; No Records For Maya Exist. -Details here.

OKUBO CAUGHT AGAIN: Admits Providing False Information Regarding DoH Maintenance Of Divorce Records. -Details here. -More archived reports on Hawaii can be viewed here and here.

CONFIRMED: Hawaii Department of Health is Aiding and Abetting Obama's Forged Certification of Live Birth, Got Final Nail in the Coffin!? -Details here.

ANOTHER MATTER: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. -Details here. Just like the DNC Certs.
Hawaii HB1116 - Legislation to Release Birth Records of "Person of Civic Prominence" AKA Obama for $100.00 ...
2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nomination for Presidential Candidates -
2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate with constitutionally eligible provision - Hawaii
2008 DNC Presidential nomination certificate without constitutionally eligible provision - Georgia
Hawaii Sr Election Clerk-Obama Not Born in any Hawaii Hospital-Wash Times Natl Wkly-20100621 Pg 5

Friday, January 28, 2011

CDR Kerchner: Why the three U.S. Supreme Court justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas did not attend the State of the Union address by Obama.

- For Immediate Release - 28 January 2011 - A statement from Commander Charles Kerchner -

Why the three U.S. Supreme Court justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas did not attend the State of the Union address by Obama. I believe that three U.S. Supreme Court justices did not attend the State of the Union address to send a message to the world in one of the few ways they can within their self imposed decorum of the court rules ... by voting with their feet and non-presence and not attending a state of the union message given by someone they consider and believe to not be constitutionally eligible. And my words on 29 Nov 2010 are as true today as they were when I wrote them in November as to who is blocking the resolution of the Obama eligibility issue on that court. In my opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts is the Neville Chamberlain of the court and has been the one all along preventing the U.S. Supreme Court from acting over the last 2 years to address the Obama eligibility issue.

Chief Justice Roberts is a RINO on the court when it comes to Obama. A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al | by CDR Kerchner (Ret) | @ Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions ... http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/statement-from-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret.html

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

Check out the different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;

1) Daily Kos COLB; http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg 

2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg 

3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg 

4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg 

All should view the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com

Confirmed: Hawaii Department of Health is Aiding and Abetting Obama & Gangs Forged Certification of Live Birth, Got Final Nail in the Coffin!? -Details at Source.

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.

And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.

Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel; Obama’s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.

And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.

Bonus; CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama’s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established – the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #1: Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama’s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.

Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #2: While Obama’s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.

Confirmed: - Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President - Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
A Catalog of Evidence-Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt Putative Pres Obama Born in HI
Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility-The 3 Enablers-20091130 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly-pg 9
Obama Ineligible/Support LTC Terry Lakin - Wash Times Natl Wkly 2011-01-10 2 Pg Ctr Fold-pgs 20&21

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Obama Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo: The Two Issues Regarding Obama's Eligibility to be President of the United States of America.

- The Two Issues Regarding Obama's Eligibility to be President - by Obama Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo -

There are two open issues regarding whether putative President Obama is eligible to be President. One is place of birth. Consider that in all the law suits filed against Obama and others on the place of birth issue, including the Kerchner v. Obama/Congress law suit (which also argued that regardless of place of birth, Obama is not and cannot be a “natural born Citizen” because he was not born in the United States to a U.S. citizen father and mother), Obama never once produced any birth certificate (neither his Certification of Live Birth known as the COLB nor his long-form, hospital generated Certificate of Live Birth) for the court which would have put an end to the birth place issue. Why did he pursue a legal strategy (e.g. standing, political question, and other justiciability defenses) which only worked in the short term rather than just produce the birth certificate which would finally end the birth place controversy?

Why spend so much private and public money and resources fighting the same issue over and over again? Even now, over two years after the 2008 election, we see the same place of birth issue raised in various contexts. It has risen in the military context with LTC Terry Lakin, who is serving 6 months in federal prison for defending the Constitution by wanting to assure that Obama is a “natural born Citizen.” We see it in ObamaCare litigation. Now some states are also moving to require proof of birth as part of a presidential candidate's requirements to get on the ballot. Hawaii Governor Abercrombie has recently revived the birth place issue, vowing to find the birth certificate and put an end to the debate. But we have seen that he found no birth certificate.

So, there is no end to the issue of Obama’s place of birth. Should we not blame Obama himself for this issue still existing? After all, the Constitution says that he must be a “natural born Citizen.” Is not the burden on him to satisfy that requirement?

Why has Obama allowed this issue to continue unabated? Why have all the Department of Justice attorneys repeatedly taken the same approach in defending Obama, i.e., fighting jurisdiction (standing) and raising any other justiciability defense? Why have to fought so hard to prevent any litigant to have discovery so that a copy of the birth certificate could be obtained? Why have they to this day never produced a copy of any birth certificate in any court which would have put an end to the birth place issue not only in that court but in all other courts present and in the future?

While the courts have not been too kind to the "birthers," why has not one court even mentioned the fact that not one court in the whole nation has yet to see Obama’s alleged birth certificate?

We even have had an Indiana court in Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct.App. 2009), declare that “persons born within the borders of the United States are ‘natural born Citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.” But the court never even raised the issue that there was no proof before the court that Obama was "born within the borders of the United States." In fact, the Ankeny court, while dismissing the plaintiffs' case, never ruled that Obama was "born within the borders of the United States." Nor did it rule that he was a "natural born Citizen."

How can a modern and advanced nation such as the United States, a leader of the free world, a model for constitutional republican government, find itself in such a situation? We have been debating the issue of Obama’s place of birth publicly and in the courts for over 2 years and we as a nation still do not know with any reasonable degree of certainty whether Obama was born in the United States. The place of birth issue is not a conspiracy issue, but rather only one demanding conclusive proof that Obama was born in Hawaii.

But apart from the place of birth issue, we also have the question of whether Obama is an Article II "natural born Citizen." Assuming that he was born in Hawaii, does Obama meet the definition of an Article II "natural born Citizen?" The Framers' constitutional scheme, historical evidence (e.g. Emer de Vattel's The Law of Nations, Section 212), and U.S. Supreme Court precedent (e.g. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) show that the American common law definition of an Article II "natural born Citizen" has its basis in natural law and the law of nations and not the English common law. That definition, which to this day has never been changed, is a child born in the country (or equivalent such as being born abroad to parents in the service of their nation) to a U.S. citizen father and mother.

There is no factual dispute that when Obama was born in 1961, wherever that may be, he was born to a father who under the British Nationality Act of 1948 was a British subject/citizen and that Obama himself by descent from his father was born a British subject/citizen. Not only was Obama's father not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born, but his father never became a U.S. citizen nor was he even ever a domiciliary or permanent resident of the United States.  These undisputed facts show that Obama is not and cannot be an Article II "natural born Citizen."

So, there are two open issues: was Obama born in Hawaii and if he was, is he an Article II "natural born Citizen." Assuming that Obama runs for re-election, how will our nation address these issues in the 2012 presidential campaign and election? Will Congress, other political institutions, the media, and candidates exhibit political and moral courage and tackle these issues once and for all or will they like so many others have done just turn a blind eye to the Constitution and the rule of law and continue with business as usual?


Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
January 27, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
#### Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].

Check out the different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly or Anderson Pooper;

1) Daily Kos COLB; http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg 

2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg 

3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg 

4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg 

All should view the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com

Confirmed: Hawaii Department of Health is Aiding and Abetting Obama & Gangs Forged Certification of Live Birth, Got Final Nail in the Coffin!? -Details at Source.

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's.

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more HERE and HERE.

And this oldie; Hawaii Officials refuse to verify president's online COLBs images released by Obama's campaign and FactCheck.org...
In response to a direct question from WND, the Hawaii Department of Health refused to authenticate either of the two versions of President Obama's short-form Certificate of Live Birth, or COLB, posted online – neither the image produced by the Obama campaign nor the images released by FactCheck.org. Janice Okubu, the public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, also had no explanation for why Dr. Fukino's initial press release last October and subsequent press release also avoided declaring the posted images to be of authentic documents.

FactCheck.org, an organization funded by the same left-leaning Annenberg Foundation that also employed Barack Obama and former Weatherman radical bomber Bill Ayers, produced a short-form Obama COLB that was very different in appearance than the campaign released. Source. And much more HERE.

Forgery is nothing new to the Obama campaign, via Debbie Schlussel; Obama’s Selective Service Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this(last) year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. The full investigative report is HERE.

And via Give us Liberty; EXPLOSIVE...more proof that AKA OBAMA is a fraud and very likely not even an American citizen!... - Obama conspiracy – It’s no longer just a theory - A man who fails to register with SS before turning 26 may find that some doors are permanently closed. This is a must read HERE.

Bonus; CONFIRMED: Factcheck.org Published Bogus Fact Regarding Obama’s British/Kenyan Citizenship. We can report that it has been conclusively established – the Factcheck.org report contains false information. Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #1: Obama’s Kenyan Citizenship did not expire on Aug 4, 1982. Factcheck.org was absolutely wrong when they reported Obama’s Kenyan citizenship expired on Aug 4, 1982.

Factcheck.org – Inaccuracy #2: While Obama’s status as a British citizen may have been short lived, Factcheck.org failed to state that his status as a British subject was not short lived. Research has discovered multiple legal mechanisms which have the potential to establish that Obama is now a full citizen of Kenya as well as the United Kingdom, the European Union, the Commonwealth of Nations and the Republic of Indonesia. Source.

Confirmed: - Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President - Source.

Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama's eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Irrefutable Proof that Obama is Not Eligible to be President of the United States, the Facts Don't Lie!
Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen w/Venn Diagram-24Jan2011 Wash Times Natl Wkly pg 5
Hawaii Sr Election Clerk-Obama Not Born in any Hawaii Hospital-Wash Times Natl Wkly-20100621 Pg 5

Follow ORYR by Email

 
Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records. Design by Wpthemedesigner. Converted To Blogger Template By Anshul Tested by Blogger Templates.