Taitz v Astrue, Reply to Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration, Obama's E-Verified Failed Connecticut Social Security Number Request for Oral argument to be held within 20 days
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this reply to opposition to motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Opposition by the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue did not oppose any substantive points of the motion for reconsideration and the motion should be considered unopposed on the merits. In case the court believes, that the substantive points were addressed, the Plaintiff provides the following argument in reply to opposition and in support for motion for reconsideration.
EMERGENCY CITUATION
Defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security administration through his attorneys, Department of Justice-US Attorneys' office, is claiming that the fact that Barack Obama, an individual without a valid social security number according to e-verify, is occupying the position of the US president and Commander in Chief, does not represent an emergency situation and therefore there should not be a reconsideration.
In response Plaintiff herein is using Your Honors' own lexicon: "They are either toying with the nation or showing their stupidity".
Taitz provided irrefutable evidence, showing that Barack Hussein Obama has used in his tax returns and his selective service a Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-verify. Even without e-verify, fraud is evident, as the number starts with 042, a number sequence assigned to the state of CT, where Obama never resided. Can our Commissioner of Social Security and our Department of Justice led by Eric Holder be so completely brain dead to suggest, that having a criminal with a stolen social security number and a forged birth certificate and an unknown allegiance does not represent an emergency?
For Michael Astrue, a licensed attorney, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; for the US attorneys, representing him,
to even suggest, that
there is no “legitimate public interest” in knowing whether we have a criminal in the White House with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, is simply unthinkable, it represents a total lack of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, that they were sworn to protect. This behavior by the Commissioner of the Social Security administration and US attorneys representing him, is simply criminal, it simply amounts to obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting Social Security fraud and possibly treason against the United States of America. If this is not an emergency, what is, if there is no public interest in knowing, whether we have a criminal in the White House, when is there a public interest? Can there be a more dire emergency? We have a breach of the national security in the highest office in the land, and our Department of Justice does not grasp that this is an emergency?
It is hard to believe that we have such an unprecedented stupidity, therefore we are left to deduct, that we have an unprecedented level of corruption in all three brunches of our government, which allows this crime to go on for nearly three years. Specifically because it is the highest level of emergency, we need Your Honor to address the evidence and reconsider the motion for summary judgment.
NEWLY AVAILABLE EVIDENCE
FULL REPLY DRAFT HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/66724304/Taitz-v-Astrue-Reply-to-Opposition-to-Motion-for-Reconsideration-Obama-s-Social-Security-Number-9-28-2011
Taitz v Astrue Opposition Filed: Obama's Privacy Rights Trump Social Security Number Fraud. FULL OPPOSITION HERE
Taitz v Astrue - Motion for Reconsideration/Exhibits - Obama's Social Security Number - MOTION and EXHIBITS HERE
New Details: SSA Found Discrepancy in Obama's Social Security Number Record - DETAILS HERE
Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants. MORE HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/private-investigators-respond-to-snopes.html
Obama guilty of at least one felony punishable by $250,000 fine and up to 5 years in prison. MORE HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-guilty-of-at-least-one-felony.html
Taitz v Astrue - Reply to Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration - Obama's Social Security Number - 9/28/...
Private Investigator: Obama's Fraudulent Social Security Number & Selective Service Registration
Obama's SSN Fails E-Verify System - 26 Sep 2011 Wash Times National Wkly edition - pg 5
I, on behalf of Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ, challenge Atty Mark Levin to debate on his radio show, or a venue of Mark Levin’s choosing, the legal term of art “natural born Citizen of the United States”, and Obama and Rubio's constitutional ineligibility, with Article II, Section 1 constitutional presidential eligibility expert Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg NJ. Mark Levin, do you have the guts to have an on-air debate on the issue you so readily dismiss. Attorney Apuzzo has accepted the challenge. If anyone reading this knows Mark Levin's personal email address, forward to him this challenge. Mark, here’s the link to get in touch with Atty Apuzzo if you have the gonads to debate another attorney on the issue you pontificate about on your radio show but provide no contemporaneous historical or legal facts from the founding and constitution drafting era to back up your position: http://puzo1.blogspot.com
