Write-in Presidential Candidate Files Writ of Quo Warranto to Oust Obama And/Or Prevent Obama From Accessing 2012 Ballot
Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Ronald Machen - Writ of Quo Warranto - United States District Court For The District Of Columbia - Case Assigned To Obama Appointed District Judge Amy Berman Jackson -
Re: Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama pursuant to District of Columbia Code, Division II, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Title 16, Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 35, §§ 3501-3503
I write as an “interested person” requesting that you institute Quo Warranto proceeding against Barack Obama pursuant to D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35, §3502 on your own motion, or if you prefer, upon relation to me.
As an initial matter, I maintain that I am a “person interested” as referenced in §3503 as I am a declared write-in candidate for the November 6, 2012, election for the office of President of the United States. See: Exhibit “A”. As such, under the plain language of Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915), I have standing to make this request of you.
Clearly, under §3501, Barack Obama, “within the District of Columbia . . .holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States”, to wit, (i) in the District of Columbia, a place upon the November 6, 2012, ballot as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States and (ii) the office of President of the United States. As more fully described below, I maintain that, in both cases, he “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds or exercises such franchise and/or public office in violation of §3501.
Indisputably, in order to be President of the United States, Article II, §1, of the U.S. Constitution requires: “No person except a natural born Citizen . . ., shall be eligible to the Office of President.” The phrase “natural born Citizen” is a 18th Century legal term of art with a definite meaning. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that phrase was defined as: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” (The Law of Nations, Emerich de Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, § 212).
On July 25, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, the presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, stating: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.” (Farrand's Records, Volume 3, LXVIII. John Jay to George Washington). Subsequently, On August 22, 1787, it was proposed at the Constitutional Convention that the presidential qualifications were to be a “citizen of the United States.” (Farrand's Records – Journal, Wednesday August 22nd 1787). It was referred back to a Committee, and the qualification clause was changed to read “natural born citizen,” and was so reported out of Committee on September 4, 1787, and thereafter adopted in the Constitution. (Farrand's Records, Journal, Tuesday September 4, 1787).
Though there is no record of debates upon the subject, the Federalist Papers contain a contemporary comment on it written by Alexander Hamilton which reads: “Nothing was more to be desired, than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption. These most deadly adversaries of Republican government, might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?” (The Federalist Papers, LXVIII.)
Supporting this view, is Mr. Justice Story who wrote: “It is indispensable, too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States . . . The general propriety of the exclusion of foreigners, in common cases, will scarcely be doubted by any sound statesman. It cuts off all chances for ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office; and interposes a barrier against those corrupt interferences of foreign governments in executive elections, which have inflicted the most serious evils upon the elective monarchies of Europe. (Story on the Constitution, Vol. 2, page 353-54.)
Clearly, Barack Obama has represented that he is the son of a non-citizen of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., who was a citizen of Kenya. Accordingly, upon the law and facts, Barack Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” and thus “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds – and seeks again to be elected to – the office of President of the United States.
CONTINUED BELOW AND HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/77432908/Montgomery-Blair-Sibley-v-Barack-Obama-Quo-Warranto-United-States-District-Court-for-the-District-of-Columbia
SCION OF PROMINENT 19TH CENTURY POLITICAL FAMILY ANNOUNCES WRITE-IN CANDIDACY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND FILES QUO WARRANTO SUIT CHALLENGING OBAMA’S “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” STATUS - PRESS RELEASE HERE -
SIBLEY'S WEBSITE: http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/2d.html
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Montgomery Blair Sibley v Barack Obama - Quo Warranto - United States District Court for the District of Co...
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC