Video: CBS Atlanta News: Georgia Judge Orders Obama To Attend Ballot Access Hearing - 1/20/2012 - VIDEO HERE
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC
61 comments:
5 days and counting. All hell breaks loose after this hearing.
at least the case will be covered nationally.
whatever outcome, obama's credibility will be out there for all to read.
we need a woodward and bernstein at the Wash Post or Wash Times.
5 days and counting...can't wait. But I'm a little more pessimistic. I don't think we will see the breakthrough we are hoping for. Personally, I think that Obama will either no-show and produce nothing, or his lawyer will walk in and hand the court a certified copy of his Hawaiian BC. This is going to be a Donald Trumpesque moment I'm afraid.
A legal certified birth certificate actually supports Swenson's case as it may prove that only obama's mama was a US Citizen at the time of his birth.
"Anonymous said...[Reply]
A legal certified birth certificate actually supports Swenson's case as it may prove that only obama's mama was a US Citizen at the time of his birth."
That's not a fact in dispute. His attorney would stipulate to that fact. We already know that, have known it for many years.
Soetoro is done. Nancy and co. are next. An avalanche is occurring and all involved will pay for their crimes. Welcome to a New, Brighter, and Freer America.
@AnonymousYou would think some young up and coming reporter would jump all over this in order to make a name for himself like Woodward and Bernstein did.
How come CBS is treating this as local news and not as National News?
WTF is wrong with the Main Stream Media?
Are they f#cking retarded?
Note she says the Democrat Party didn’t have a comment. So why did they have to put that GeorgiaDemocrat.org clip in this report? Obviously they dug this up and let this PAC make the Democrat’s point. They probably had to get special permission to use it. Think they would do that for a Republican? And watch the (5) different clips they put of the confident, smiling Obama speaking in front of landmarks, in contemplation, interacting with the media, and two different clips of him with the huge American flag behind him, and the last one smiling and shaking hands and high fiving the regular folk. Think the media has an agenda? naaaa.
Un-fucking-believable. This thing gets some news coverage and not a fucking word about what NBC is - not-one-fucking-word. Swenson gets a reporter in his face and he passes the opportunity to tell the camera what NBC is. Instead they cut to the Dumbocrat buttwipe that says it's frivolous and that the prior suits failed on "the merits". Merits? Merits? When has any court heard anything about this on the merits. And this reporter did a grand follow up.
Don't hold your breath folks. More of the same 'ole same 'ole. Way (not) to go Swenson!
Quote from Dealio:
"Soetoro is done. Nancy and co. are next. An avalanche is occurring and all involved will pay for their crimes. Welcome to a New, Brighter, and Freer America."
I hope and pray you are 100% correct, but I am restraining my celebration until after next Thursday.
Getting rid of the ineligible fraud Obama and his enablers will do more to restore America than any election or anything else that could possibly happen.
I remain cautiously optimistic.
Un-fucking-believable. This thing gets some news coverage and not a fucking word about what NBC is - not-one-fucking-word. Swenson gets a reporter in his face and he passes the opportunity to tell the camera what NBC is. Instead they cut to the Dumbocrat buttwipe that says it's frivolous and that the prior suits failed on "the merits". Merits? Merits? When has any court heard anything about this on the merits. And this reporter did a grand follow up.
Don't hold your breath folks. More of the same 'ole same 'ole. Way (not) to go Swenson!
@Black Belt
Were you standing there when he was interviewed?
How do you know what is or is not sitting on the cutting-room floor?
I looked at the order and nothing in it orders Obama to attend the hearing.
Here is blogger jbjd’s explanation of the subpoena issue (it cleared up the matter for me)
The GA election code requires that only candidates qualified for the job may have the state print their names on the ballot. The law allows citizens to contest the eligibility of candidates to the SoS and then, to an administrative law judge. (In other words, the process addresses whether the administration of the ballot eligibility law has been followed.) The Plaintiffs, represented by Orly, filed a ballot challenge with an administrative law judge arguing Defendant Obama is ineligible to be POTUS. They issued a subpoena – remember, this is the document they downloaded off the GA court web site but then ‘indicated’ was actually issued by the court – to Defendant Obama, requiring him to appear and answer questions. Under normal circumstances, if a Defendant served by Plaintiff with a subpoena, refuses to comply with the request; the Plaintiff may then ask the court to sign an Order compelling whatever the subpoena requires. Obama’s local (GA) attorney received the subpoena and submitted to the court a Motion to Quash, thereby asking the court not to allow Plaintiff’s subpoena. If granted, this would mean, Orly could not in the future compel such compliance. Orly awaited the court ruling on Defendant’s motion, taking no further action, such as filing an Opposition to Defendant’s motion; to advance her position. The judge ruled to reject Defendant’s motion to quash on the narrow specific grounds that he had failed to provide sufficient (read, any) legal precedent or citations to support his motion. (Thus, in effect, by doing absolutely nothing, Orly obtained for the first time a court ruling prolonging her case instead of ending it on the spot.)
In other words, this administrative law procedure is several steps away from producing a court Order to appear, Orly’s misrepresentations cyberspace victory dance – “I won!!! I won!!!” – notwithstanding.
At the end of the news report video, the reporter says something like, "several Republicans and Democrats we talked to said don't expect President Obama to attend. There are several laws ... "
What laws is she talking about? If this is true, that there are laws that protect Obama from having to testify, what is everybody getting excited about?
It seems like Orly and Swensson and the others are jumping the gun.
Mark Gillar had a show with Mara Zebest, and butterdezillion today.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2012/01/21/experts-debate-obamas-birth-certificate
@Black Belt
What does one expect from a Meredith owned TV station like WGCL-TV (CBS Atlanta)
And see this from Open Secrets as to how Meredith spreads its money...
http://www.opensecrets.org/usearch/index.php?q=Meredith+Corporation&searchButt_clean.x=0&searchButt_clean.y=0&cx=010677907462955562473%3Anlldkv0jvam&cof=FORID%3A11
Recall the bin Laden charade to deflect attention from the Corsi book. Look for another false flag event upcoming to distract attention from the GA hearing.
i think that nothing will happen on this or any other front. 100% of dems and 99% of repubs are in bed with zerO. I have only heard one or two congressmen mention the BC or eligibility. If zerO goes then a lot of other heads would roll and they wont let that happen.
@Anonymous
At the end of the news report video, the reporter says something like, "several Republicans and Democrats we talked to said don't expect President Obama to attend. There are several laws ... "
===========================
Fine, then he simply won't get on the GA ballot because there is no evidence shown that he is eligible...according to the "laws" of GA!!
@Anonymous
He's ALREADY on the Georgia Democratic primary ballot. He's the ONLY candidate on the Georgia Democratic primary ballot. Voting has ALREADY begun.
The Georgia presidential primary is for the purpose of determining proportionate voting by the Georgia delegates to the national convention. You seriously think that removing Obama from the primary ballot will change how the Georgia delegates vote when they get to the convention in Charlotte?
Please, tell me how that works.
@Anonymous
"@Anonymous
At the end of the news report video, the reporter says something like, "several Republicans and Democrats we talked to said don't expect President Obama to attend. There are several laws ... "
===========================
Fine, then he simply won't get on the GA ballot because there is no evidence shown that he is eligible...according to the "laws" of GA!!"
If Obama is protected by a law from having to testify in an admin proceeding, then the judge cannot penalize him for not testifying.
I am curious as to what GA law everyone keeps talking about that does not require him to testify or show up. Can someone please tell me what law would not make that happen?
"@Anonymous
He's ALREADY on the Georgia Democratic primary ballot. He's the ONLY candidate on the Georgia Democratic primary ballot. Voting has ALREADY begun.
The Georgia presidential primary is for the purpose of determining proportionate voting by the Georgia delegates to the national convention. You seriously think that removing Obama from the primary ballot will change how the Georgia delegates vote when they get to the convention in Charlotte?
Please, tell me how that works."
=============================================
Question. If that it is true, and he is not allowed to be on the ballot due to ineligibility, and the delegates vote for him anyways, I would think that would lead to a major legal challenge. I would also think that it could lead to push more states towards getting rid of the delegate process and go with the 'Popular Vote' in future elections, and GA would be responsible for making that happen. With the Popular Vote, if he is not allowed to be on the ballot, then no one would be allowed to vote for him.
I can be wrong, but that seems like a genuine possibility.
@Anonymous
"Question. If that it is true, and he is not allowed to be on the ballot due to ineligibility, and the delegates vote for him anyways, I would think that would lead to a major legal challenge. I would also think that it could lead to push more states towards getting rid of the delegate process and go with the 'Popular Vote' in future elections, and GA would be responsible for making that happen. With the Popular Vote, if he is not allowed to be on the ballot, then no one would be allowed to vote for him.
I can be wrong, but that seems like a genuine possibility."
_____
Legal challenge by whom? Who, within the Democratic party, would have standing to challenge the Georgia delegates' votes? Where is the authority for courts to intervene in political parties' conventions?
Each state's political party is autonomous. Why would what happens in Georgia push another state to change its method of delegate selection?
Many states employ a caucus system for determining who will win their delegates' votes. Why does Georgia have any influence over caucus states? How about those states that use a state convention method. How would this ALJ's decision -- based solely on being miffed that a witness was a no-show -- have any influence over another state's mechanism for choosing delegates?
The roblem with you birthers is that you don't understand how the Georgia presidential primary works. You haven't thought through the process. This ballot challenge, by David Farrar, Carl Swensson, etc (all REpublicans) is a challenge to the DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GEORGIA's selection process. It is a primary election challenge. It does nothing to stop the convention in Charlotte from nominating Obama. In fact, since he has no serious Democratic challengers in the race for the nomination, the conventioneers don't even need to take a vote -- they can simply nominate Obama as their Presidential candidate by proclamation.
So what, exactly, is Orly accomplishing with her subpoenas?
Yo' hear dat, Bari? Dat means yo' needs to git yo' illegal ass in court.
Maybe Jablonski screwed the pooch on purpose to embarrass the Usurper.
Hmmm.....
So Judge,
Please tell me.
Is your mother your sister and your father your brother or is your sister your aunt and your brother your grandfather?
Only an ignorant, inbred, redneck, sister-loving redneck would waste the court's time and money like this.
What is wrong with you people?
Are you such racists, so filled with hatred that a black man lives in the White House that you resort to such stupidity?
Most of you are such cowards you're afraid to even put your name on your idiotic comments.
I'm not suprised. Cowards, all of you.
Pathetic, all of you!
Pathetic!
What??? Asking O.whodat to give up a game of golf??
@Beverly S. Hill Hey Beverly S. Hill, stick that race card where the sun don't shine! It's worn out and we ain't buying it anymore. I don't care if the Obastard is purple, he's not eligible PERIOD. What about 2 citizen parents are you NOT understanding??? Try reading a little in your spare time (as in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution) and get your ignorant head out of your ass. If anyone is pathetic, it's you sista. Stick that in your crack pipe and smoke it.
AR925, way to slap down Bev. She's the coward for resorting to that idiotic "black man in the White House" shtick. Please. Go find another excuse, lady.
As for Maobama having to miss his golf game, he could always hit the links in Georgia and take yet another vacation at the same time. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Bueller?
Bueller?
...
Anybody?
Anyone going to answer the questions: How does removing Barack Obama's name from the Georgia primary ballot accomplish anything? How does this stop the Georgia delegates from going to the convention? How does this change how they will vote at the convention?
At the end of the hearing, when the judge makes his recommendation, in February, to the SOS, how does this challenge change anything?
Hint: It doesn't. Obama will be the convention nominee, with or without the Georgia votes. Obama will be on the general election ballot, regardless whether he wins the electoral votes of Georgia.
You have accomplished zip.
@AR925
You are going to mighty disappointed when the judge rejects your two-citizen theory.
@ Anonymous 7:27pm
"Legal challenge by whom? Who, within the Democratic party, would have standing to challenge the Georgia delegates' votes? Where is the authority for courts to intervene in political parties' conventions?
Each state's political party is autonomous. Why would what happens in Georgia push another state to change its method of delegate selection?
Many states employ a caucus system for determining who will win their delegates' votes. Why does Georgia have any influence over caucus states? How about those states that use a state convention method. How would this ALJ's decision -- based solely on being miffed that a witness was a no-show -- have any influence over another state's mechanism for choosing delegates?
The roblem with you birthers is that you don't understand how the Georgia presidential primary works. You haven't thought through the process. This ballot challenge, by David Farrar, Carl Swensson, etc (all REpublicans) is a challenge to the DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF GEORGIA's selection process. It is a primary election challenge. It does nothing to stop the convention in Charlotte from nominating Obama. In fact, since he has no serious Democratic challengers in the race for the nomination, the conventioneers don't even need to take a vote -- they can simply nominate Obama as their Presidential candidate by proclamation.
So what, exactly, is Orly accomplishing with her subpoenas? "
================================
Currently, there are 9 states that have enacted the "National Popular Vote" bill in their states: CA-55 votes, IL-20 votes, NJ-14 votes, HI-4 votes, DC-3 votes, Vt-3 votes, WA-12 votes, MA-11 votes, MD-10 votes. That is a total of 132 electoral votes, or 49% needed to elect a President. Once the 270 electoral votes are attained through state legislatures to enact the bill, it will basically become enforceable. That means that no electoral votes would be given to any candidate, until all votes have been counted. Then, and only then will the electoral members be assembled, and sent to DC to place their votes. But they can only vote for the candidate with the most popular vote across the nation. If you think I may be mistaken about this, please take a look at this website here:
http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/index.php
I really hope this goes into effect soon. This is just what this country needs. To make every vote count.
@Anonymous I hope he hits the links on the 26th. He definitely will not be in Atlanta.
A state administrative law judge can't do sh*t about it either.
@Anonymous
Same thing. Either Swenson is an idiot or (if it was cut out) the reporter is dumb or in the tank. Same 'ole thing.
BTW - see Ms. Brace's email address at the bottom of the video near the end. Shoot her an email and tell her how positively thorough she is. I did.
@Beverly S. Hill
Hi Bev-you are in serious denial if you cannot see what's going on. Spend the same amount of time you took to write your little missive researching SCOTUS on NBC and then ask yourself if you're an American or a political idealogue in love with a lying low life. Maybe you will choose to be an American. Get a grip for chissake.
@Beverly S. Hill
Look it a mirror when you call someone a racist.
Bari Malik Shabazz
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/20/4203280/ga-judge-orders-president-to-appear.html
Ga. judge orders president to appear at hearing
snippet ......
An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.
P.S. He'll be campaigning in Las Vegas and Denver on Thursday.
The Republican Party is pathetic.
Quitter (as AK Gov.) Sarah "Gotcha" Palin says we should have done a better job vetting BHOzo. Ya' think?
Romney isn't interested.
Gingrich is a liar and weirdo.
All these talking heads think they know what's best for us. How much different are they from the Dems?
Dealio:
Soetoro is done. Nancy and co. are next. An avalanche is occurring...
• I'm not holding my breath.
Covert Informant said
You would think some young up and coming reporter would jump all over this in order to make a name for himself like Woodward and Bernstein did.
• Not likely. In 1972-3, the MSM was almost as aligned against Republicans as today. See, "they" the media people want to be part of the in-crowd. Joan Swirsky calls them "Big Media". When you're "in", even if you're the loyal opposition, which I suppose Fox news is, you never want to be part of the outcasts. Think of the "untouchables" in India. The truth takes a back seat on the Obama bus, by the way.
But, I am convinced a New Day will be dawning and to paraphrase Gordon Lightfoot "every nation will be shaken".
I am not a member of any organized religion, but from my studies of Jesus Christ, it seems very obvious that truth and righteousness and the noin bearing of false witness is in the garbage heap.
@Chris
Wake up, Chris! Wipe the sleepies out of your eyes.
This case is about the PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY BALLOT, not the electoral college vote. The Georgia primary is a procedure to determine, for each political party, how their delegates to the their respective national conventions will vote.
So, like, if Newt gets 55% of the PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY votes for the Republican ballot, then 55% of the Georgia delegates are committed to vote for him at their convention in Florida. Similarly, if Obama's contestant gets 40% of the PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY votes, then ...
Oh wait. Obama has no challenger on the Georgia PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY ballot. Scratch that.
All that removing Obama from Georgia's PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY ballot does is make all of the Democratic delegates from the State of Georgia free agents, who can vote for whomever they wish at the convention in Charlotte. They are free to vote for the other Democratic candidate.
Oh wait. There is no other Democratic candidate. Scratch that.
The Georgia delegation will give 100% of its votes to Obama at the convention.
So ask you -- AGAIN -- what exactly is this subpoena to testify supposed to accomplish? What is this PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY ballot challenge (by people who are not even members of the Georgia Democractic Party, BTW, so why the f*ck shoul they care how the delegates vote?) -- what, exactly, is this ballot challenge going to accomplish?
Tick tock, Chris.
@Chris
"National Popular Vote" bill in their states: CA-55 votes, IL-20 votes, NJ-14 votes, HI-4 votes, DC-3 votes, Vt-3 votes, WA-12 votes, MA-11 votes, MD-10 votes."
_______________
Bwahahahahahahaha!
You're talking about a bill. A bill -- really? You know that a bill is something that hasn't passed into law, right? If it has, then it would called a "law."
Let's look at those states that are considering this "National Popular Vote" bill, shall we?
CA -- a blue state. Count 55 electoral votes for Obama.
IL -- a blue state - 20 votes
NJ -- blue state - 14 votes
HI -- You're friggin' kidding us, right? Obama's HOME state? Blue state - 4 votes
DC -- Blue - 3 votes
VT -- Was blue in 2008. Who knows about 2012. In any event, VT counts for only 3 votes
WA -- A blue states - 12 votes for Obama there
MA --11 votes, blue
MD -- a blue state. 10 votes.
Chris, I'm liking this bill mnore and more. You must be an Obot, right?
@FW28
Good thing you are not holding your breath, cause you would die of oxygen deprivation.
You are waaaaaaaay overreading this judge's order denying a simple motion to quash. How about you read it again, and post the part where it says that Obama is ordered to testify? How about you post the part where the judge says he will enforce Orly's comical subpoena.
No, Obama is not finished. Pelosi will continue to be the House minority leader, and you will still be keyboarding here at ORYR throughout 2013.
@ Anon at 10:25 a.m.:
I'd guess if the Democrat delegates are foolish enough to go ahead and vote for the illegal president despite being found ineligible to be on the ballot, you can be most assured that such criminal behavior will be slapped down in court, depriving him of the delegate votes.
Furthermore, being left off the ballot will accomplish one other thing: cast doubts in the minds of election officials in other states about whether this clown has something to hide.
@California birther/dualer/doubter
Who cares what he has to hide after Hillary Clinton gets the nomination since birther kicked Obama off the primary ballot?
Say this a few times, until you get accustomed to it:
"President Clinton"
The local news CBS reporterette stated that past Obama eligibility cases have been found in his favor on the "Merit." Wrong TV news lady - NONE have been found on the merit in any past case.
Silly OBot at 11:05 AM
Say this a few times, until you get accustomed to it:
"President Clinton"
Yeah, you do just that Dem-Dumbs; the fastest way to a huge defeat. Yes, go for it.
Romney -- the man responsible for the Massachusetts health care system -- versus Hillary Clinton, whose 1993 health care bill inspired Mittens.
That would be a great race!
@Anonymous
Unless you haven't heard OBums, Mittens Romney gave up about 26% poll points. An epic collapse in only a week to LOSE to Gingrich by a dozen points in the SC primary.
Gingrich would eat any little Demrat pres candidate's breakfast, lunch, and dinner in debates. And he has the balls to expose your Ms. Teleprompter OBama.
@RS
Oh gee, a Mormon lost a Southern Christian fundamentalist state to a Southerner. That certainly ends the primary season, doesn't it? /snark
How does Newton's message play with the moderates and independents -- you know, the ones who decide elections?
@Anonymous
Followup comment #2 1-21-12 2:03 pm
This video on Drudge!!
AT LAST!!
"Van Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HIS STRATEGY IS:
John Dummett (candidate for POTUS)of California and Van Irion, founder of Liberty Legal Foundation, have partnered in filing a lawsuit against the Democrat National Committee to stay the nomination of Obama as its candidate for the presidential election.... and not attacking Barack Obama or asking any court to decide Obama’s eligibility...which includes Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz, Reid, the DNC and the courts in Washington, DC and Tennessee... New Hampshire and in Arizona with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which in dicta said that a presidential candidate would have standing to bring forth a suit in court.”
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/12/10/presidential-candidate-meeting-with-sheriff-joe-arpaio-yielded-devastating-information/
..wish Orly did. She thinks Irion "is scared to press the most explosive charges", which is why he severed it from hers.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/01/21/obama-set-for-trial-forged-birth-certificate-and-fraudulent-social-security-numbers/
"John Dummett (candidate for POTUS)of California and Van Irion, founder of Liberty Legal Foundation, have partnered in filing a lawsuit against the Democrat National Committee to stay the nomination of Obama as its candidate for the presidential election.... and not attacking Barack Obama or asking any court to decide Obama’s eligibility...which includes Pelosi, Wasserman-Schultz, Reid, the DNC and the courts in Washington, DC and Tennessee... New Hampshire and in Arizona with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which in dicta said that a presidential candidate would have standing to bring forth a suit in court.”"
The suit was filed quite some time ago, on in federal court in AZ and one in state court in TN.
They did not sue the Democratic Committee and they've not served anyone on either suit, so it sits, regardless of what Van Irion or Dummett continue to tell the public.
Anyone with a PACER account can check the AZ suit docket and anyone with a computer can check the TN docket.
@Anonymous
How does Newton's message play with the moderates and independents -- you know, the ones who decide elections?
He did pretty good. He won those in SC. More to follow...
OBots are just like Mitwits in the sorry Main Stream Media. And today, they have smelly stink all over their faces. LoL.
If you have the winning ideas and are bold on the national stage, you win. McCain was nothing but a wet noodle in 2008 and he still is. Obama chanting for months in 2008 the empty apparatchik phrases like "Hope & Change" is a LOSER strategy in 2012.
And Dumb-OBots, you better look at the exit polling demographics where Gingrich won in every category being tracked to include WOMEN and INDEPENDENTS over Mittens in the OPEN South Carolina Primary. OBots have to lie and cheat to "win," which makes them LOSERS in life.
@RS
Prepare to be disappointed about Georgia. Obama will be on the primary and general election ballots. Newt will not go birther.
I don't have to be "prepared for disappointment" OBum. Your girl Obama is just not Constitutionally eligible as we all know that's the truth. The Establishment supporting a false paradigm about Obama is not winning.
So if he's ineligible to appear on a primary ballot...logic would dictate that he is then ineligible to appear on that same state's national election ballot as well. Obots are so stupid as to be able to extrapolate the obvious.
Obama IS on the ballot. The SOS determined that he qualified. This proceeding is to challenge the SOS's decision.
If Malihi wrongly recommends removal the SOS can disagree. In any event, there will be at least two appeals through the state courts. Judicial judges don't buy novel theories; they follow existing law as it is generally understood. It is generally understood by state and federal courts that any native born citizen meets the qualification for NBC. They are not going to go rogue and reject the norm.
If Malihi wrongly recommends removal the SOS can disagree. In any event, there will be at least two appeals through the state courts.
Or Obama does what comes naturally to him by forgetting Georgia, he goes play golf.
Judicial judges don't buy novel theories;
Yes, strict constructionist don't cotton to the novel nonsense that flows between OBot synapses.
"Anyone with a PACER account can check the AZ suit docket and anyone with a computer can check the TN docket."
Update to the above: There are new filings in AZ as of 1/23, none of which change anything stated in the above posting, except, realizing their mistake that they indeed had sued a nonexistent entity, they merely added the DNC on a pleading.
They filed a second amended complaint, which restarts the clock... they are not going to be receiving any default anything.
There is no indication on PACER of any other federal suits besides AZ. There is no certification of any class, yet they continue to try to make people think there is a class action suit in progress. Van Irion's assertion that because on plaintiff has standing they all do if they pay their ten bucks and sign up is patently false.
In the TN state court case there is nothing on the public docket since the complaint has been filed, no proof of service... nothing.
John Dummett, to my knowledge, is not on any ballot. He has an FEC # just like 300+ other non-candidates have, nothing more.
Smoke and mirrors.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.