MALEVOLENT FORCES HAVE STOLEN
THE
SANCTITY OF THE BALLOT
APPEAL IN PROGRESS
DESTINATION: U.S. SUPREME COURT
Kevin Richard Powell @ Pixel Patriot
The case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama and the other Georgia ballot challenge cases are different from all of the previous cases in that the judge DENIED Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, this case cannot be compared to any of the previous cases because the merits of the case were presented in open court before Judge Michael Malihi. Subsequently, the FACTS with regard to Barack Obama’s “natural-born Citizen” status and non-compliance with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution as required for the Office of the President of the United States were entered into the court record. However, Obama ignored the subpoena requiring his attendance to the judicial proceeding where neither he nor his attorney even showed up and then his attorney sent an email directly to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to just cancel the hearing, a move which is completely against the established “rules” of the court.
In an incomprehensible turn of events, Judge Malihi ultimately rewarded Obama’s astounding display of contempt for the court and his attempt to subvert the U.S. Constitution and “Rule of Law” by finding Obama eligible for the ballot even though he entered nothing into the record to prove his eligibility.
Pursuant to Georgia election law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a):
(a) Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.
Malihi relied upon a non-binding advisory opinion from an Indiana State case over a U.S. Supreme Court case which has held binding precedent since 1875 to “consider” Obama’s eligibility. In effect his recommendation would signify that the U.S. Constitution as he “considers” it would allow the child of a terrorist with dual allegiance to be President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.
With great foresight and deliberate resolve, the Founders explicitly crafted the requirement of “natural-born Citizen” as a safeguard to guarantee protection for the nation against foreign influence.
The extant implications are so far-reaching they belie all reason and can’t be ignored. The foundations of our government made up of three equal branches have been totally undermined such that the Judiciary either can’t or won’t enforce the U.S. Constitution which is the “Law of the Land.”
The dangers posed to the Republic are profoundly grave. At best the Judiciary is of no effect upon an unchecked Executive branch, and at worst the Judiciary is complicit in the total destruction of the Constitution leaving tyranny in its wake.
This is not a theoretical exposition. While these United States are supposed to comprise a representative Republic, the fact remains Malevolent Forces have stolen the sanctity of the ballot to illegitimately usurp the highest seat of power with impunity while officials in positions of trust have turned a blind eye and abrogated their responsibility to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC.
These enemies of freedom have plotted a course for the nation that will impact, if not control every aspect of your life against your will including your immutable God given rights.
We must challenge these Malevolent Forces girded by TRUTH and the armour of righteousness.
Represented by J. Mark Hatfield of Hatfield & Hatfield P.C., Waycross, GA; this Georgia Ballot Challenge case now advances in the appeals process all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Your financial support is greatly needed at this time. No amount is too small or too large.
Donations can be made here:
https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund
Updates on the case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama can be found here:
http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
"I know not the day nor hour our victory will be at hand…
But know ye this, our cause is just therefore I take this stand."
Godspeed,
Kevin Richard Powell
February 11th, 2012
For exclusive Pixel Patriot Research visit: http://PixelPatriot.blogspot.com
ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
44 comments:
Did the attorney for the Defendant [Jablonski] commit an act that can be sanctioned by writing that infamous letter/email to the GA Sec. of State asking him to stop the hearing the night before the court date? If so, why hasn't that happened?
The plot thickens, the battle continues, and the Nation is at stake, so praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.
@Harry IIHarry, I'm withh you when you say, "praise the Lord and pass the ammunition" but isn't it also tiem to pass the collection plate and support the people who are doing all the work?
I don't know how much more i can take . Geesh!
I'll pay . and spread the word ..
Whaaaaat, more corruption? Does this really surprise anyone? It is everywhere, through all branches of government and the judicial system!
Nudge.. nudge.... you poor, naieve, dumb & dumber American people... nudge...nudge... how many "insane & unfounded" judicial rulings does it take for you all to realize, that there is NO VIABLE JUDICIAL check on a Muslim with a (US arsenal) nuclear capability. Wake Up ! nudge... nudge... Will you STILL BE filing lawsuits against the regime (nudge) when you and your family are ORDERED ONTO the FEMA BUS to destinations unknown?? WILL YOU ?? BY the present Law of the Land--- you can be legally ordered onto the FEMA bus... nudge...nudge. THIS is the POST -CONSTITUTIONAL ERA in America; so why oh why do you think lawsuits will work?? THAT OLD Outdated piece of paper tells you what the solution is.
SCOTUS can't be trusted either, the usurper stacked the deck with Kagen. Plus look at Kilo going against the people for naught which is still a vacant lot of nothing. SCOTUS has had the opportunity several times to do their jobs about our leader from behind in chief and they too have displayed cowardice.
-However, Obama ignored the subpoena requiring his attendance to the judicial proceeding where neither he nor his attorney even showed up and then his attorney sent an email directly to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to just cancel the hearing, a move which is completely against the established “rules” of the court.
So.... Who was the lawyer that thuoght it was inportant to subpoena the USERPENT..?!
That would'nt be the incompetent one that sends fake subpoenas and is really an OBOT PLANT would it..? Just checking...
And the other two Brilliant Lawyers did'nt think this was needed because.....???
Having a real hard time understanding why the SECRET YOMAMA OPERATIVE, is the one that sends the subpoena that efectively puts the serpent in CONTEMPT. (Wich by the way, only happens to be the "BIGGEST HIT EVER SCORED" against the sob. As some ANON had comented the other day that Orly has no accomplishments.)
Inportance was made on how hard up we all are on exposing the TRUTH and all. So I will invite the more BRILLIANT COMENTATORS on this site. to explain why this isn't.
"Natural born citizen" was used in the First Naturalization Act of 1790, very shortly after the US Constitution was written in 1787, ratified in 1788, and in operation since 1789.
In the act of 1790, "natural born" was the term used to describe a child born OUT of the limits of the US, to US citizen parents.
Said child was NOT native born.
"Natural born" was therefore used to describe natural descent and had NOTHING to do with native birth.
Some of the sitting members of the US Congress and US Senate who drafted and enacted the first naturalization Act of 1790 were the very same people who took part in the establishment of the US Constitution, where in Article II the term "natural born Citizen" was used as a term to describe the required qualities of a citizen, for such a citizen to be eligible for the highest executive office of the unprecedented new found constitutional republic.
In the period surrounding the framing of the US Constitution, and particularly to ensure protection and security for the executive positions in the new government, there was an imperative, an obligation and a duty to ensure that foreign influence, loyalty, allegiance and claim would not effect the representatives in the new government of the US.
In meeting with this imperative, the framers of the US Constitution naturally sought to ensure that only those citizens of the highest possible and most absolute loyalty, allegiance, dedication and connect to the new republic of the US were to be eligible for the office of POTUS and commander in chief of the armed forces.
It is naturally obvious that both parental connect, combined with native connect to the nation would be the most preferred qualities for one to have the best potential to guard from any foreign influence, loyalty, allegiance and claim.
There is no reasonable doubt that the term "natural born Citizen" when adopted by the framers in Article II of the US Constitution meant by natural descent AND by native birth.
In light of the term "natural born citizen" in the first naturalization Act of 1790, being used to describe one born NON-NATIVE and solely referring to DESCENT, it is therefore impossible for the term to mean or refer to native solely with the exclusion of descent from parents.
The exclusion of the wording "natural born" in the superseding Naturalization Act of 1795, left the child born off-shore to US citizen parents described as a "citizen", but the principle of DESCENT was maintained.
Why would the US Congress and the Senate, (made up of some members who were involved with the establishment of the US Constitution) make such a change between the two acts in terminology, but not in the descent principle?
The only possible explanation can be is that the US Congress and the US Senate realized that "natural born" being by descent, was one's state of being, and a "natural born" could not be made or taken away by any statute. Also, the use of the term lowered the high standard already set in the Article II eligibility criteria for POTUS because by referring only to descent it excluded native birth which was an important quality in securing the office of POTUS from any foreign, influence, divided loyalty and/or foreign claim.
So rightly, "natural born" was dropped from the naturalization acts, to reserve it's proper meaning, to be all inclusive of BOTH natural descent AND native birth.
A study of the first two naturalization acts reveals the IMPOSSIBILITY for "natural born", in the context of Article II of the US Constitution, to mean solely native born without regard to natural descent.
Pursuant to Georgia law the first review of this case will be in Fulton Superior Court. Birhthers already know that Fulton will deny their appeal as evidenced by Fulton Superior Courts refusal to allow Birther hearings in their courtrooms.
The US Supreme Court will refuse to hear this case which will leave Birthers stuck with with the decision of the GA SOS to keep Obama on the Georgia Ballot.
Represented by J. Mark Hatfield of Hatfield & Hatfield P.C., Waycross, GA; this Georgia Ballot Challenge case now advances in the appeals process all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
And it will be kicked out all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.....
@Ralph Swain
Ralph, in this context money is ammunition, as I intended to suggest and you understood.
Wow! I thought Orly would be the first one to file an appeal. I do believe Hatfield made a mistake by limiting his case to Obama's father not be a citizen. Hatfield should have used the shotgun approach like Orly.
Orly you are slipping. Where is your appeal?
Washington State has taken itself out of the Presidential Challenges.
http://sos.wa.gov/office/osos_news.aspx?i=zwm8zI6TS07Z8OKbW30dOw%3D%3D
@Anonymous
"Wow! I thought Orly would be the first one to file an appeal."
Orly cannot appeal. She is not licensed to practice in the courts of Georgia, and any appeal must be filed in the Superior Court.
Orly cannot find a sponsoring attorney.
@Anonymous
"SCOTUS can't be trusted either, the usurper stacked the deck with Kagen. Plus look at Kilo going against the people for naught which is still a vacant lot of nothing. SCOTUS has had the opportunity several times to do their jobs about our leader from behind in chief and they too have displayed cowardice."
---
You are correct. There have been twelve appeals presented to the US Supreme Court and 16 legal actions which include requests for injunctions and stays. The Supreme Court has denied them all without comment and not even one of the Justices has asked Obama to submit a brief in support of his eligibility to counter the briefs presented against him.
Any Justice can request a brief from the defendant ("Respondent").
@MichaelN
Michael, if you read the debates in Congress over the 1795 Naturalization Act, the members were very concerned about what was going on in Europe and that immigrants from Europe would bring their revolutionary ideas to the US. The debates centre on increase the amount of time an immigrant had to be in the US before becoming a citizen.
Because the Founders were for the most part Englishmen, they understood the concept that palce of birth determined allegiance, so it makes sense that they would not want someone born in a foreign country with natural allegiance to that country being able to come to the United States and become President.
In fact, the NBC phrase was removed from the 1795 act by a committee headed by James Madison, who, we know believed that the most certain criteria for alligience was place of birth.
I suppose the court system has to be given every opportunity to prove whether it is part of the usurpation process going on in the nation or not. It would seem it is, so far; but these cases, in appeal, and with their material now included in the legal record - previously excluded, by technicality, for the plaintiffs not having 'standing' - will prove that contention or not. If they are denied review by the SCOTUS, of if that body does not recognize the legal fact that is plain as day even to the dogs in the street, then justice denied is injustice, and the die is cast. The People will then have no recourse but to take matters into their own hands, and take back their country from its by-then-proven criminal government - all federal branches thereof.
If The People are wise, they will resort simply to civil disobedience - ie, in a peaceful, but unmistakable manner. I envision a March on Washington, of The People, Assembled - Oathkeepers to the fore, and right behind them, The People in all their most highly identified-with categories: Minuteman and -women, Tea Partiers, OWSers (many of whom are also incensed by the high-handedness going on of the ruling elite), Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Conservative Partiers, Libertarians, Article Twoers, Tenth Amendmenters, religionists, agnostics, atheists; all those citizens who don't want to see the tyrants take over the country (and the world; with the U.S. Constitution the main obstacle in their way) - to surround the White House (the People's House, let us recall; and lest we forget) and Congressional buildings, and voicing the ultimatum that the present occupier of the office of the presidency of the United States, who has usurped that office (with the connivance of both parties in Congress, and shadowy players behind the scenes), vacate that honorable office forthwith, and present himself for a trial for his crime against the American people;
(cont'd)
(cont'd)
with The People appointing an Officer OF the People, who will formally dissolve the sitting Congress - for being an accessory to the crime, and thus not exercising its constitutional duties and responsibilities; especially in such an important matter (all of this perfectly legal under the Constitution - Art. II, Sect. 1 - with The People taking back their sovereign rights from their power having been temporarily entrusted in the hands of their servants, their elected representatives who have proven to be disloyal, deceitful, and destructive to and of the constitutional Republic, for which they are supposed to have stood) - and call for elections within a time certain (say, 90 days); said Officer also to wield a broom and clean out the Augean stables of the executive branch of the federal government while he is still in that position assigned to him by The People - the true sovereigns in the nation, let us never forget. Who, while they are still assembled in Washington, should declare their various grievances, ie, the crimes that have been inflicted upon them by those who have been in power for too long now, and cite the cases for those deeply felt grievances (which match in nature those expressed in the original Declaration of Independence of the nation);
members of the previous Congress also to be called to answer for its failure to act on this fundamental constitutional matter; all such cases to be tried in a legitimate court of law, of The People, not of the ruling order that has usurped power in America, in furtherance of their plans for national and world control. All of these plans to be laid out - citing chapter and verse - in that siege by The People of its national leadership, for the rest of the American citizenry and all the world to see, and hear, and understand.
Understanding, that the world will be a different place, from now on. With the Light replacing the Dark in power; the former legacy now to be on Earth, as it is in Heaven.
And let the chips fall where they may - the chips of the carving out of a New Era for Humanity. And certainly not the New World Order that is currently planned for it, by souls who have lost their way in the darkness of their making, in thinking to be as very gods. To whom The People can, and should, say, now, loud and clear: We are not amused.
4:26 AM is absolutely correct. All we're doing is delaying the inevitable. We're going to have to go to DC and arrest them all ourselves. The courts and rule of law do not exist.
I'm still at a loss why a Georgian resident not file a criminal intent allegation against BHO with the State of Georgia? You now have established sworn testimony that says BHO failed to pass E-Verify, using an illegal SS#, and probably document Fraud.
If you and myself did that, how long before the INS, FBI, DOJ be knocking on our door?
Is this possible to file a criminal complaint for this testimony?
All of this has been caused by un-constitutional "Obots"
The "Obots" have already put there grandchildren in dept for life. Whats next, their great, great, great grandchildren? I can just hear them saying, "What were you thinking?"
How proud you "Obots" must be. The Homo "Obots" need not to worry, at least you don't re-populate. Yes, there is a God!
Larry Klayman makes a compelling argument for why Obama will probably be re-elected unless he is legally removed.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/klayman/120122
nothing will happen until citizens take down dc...
If article ll of the constitution has not been clear for all the years since it was written then it seems to me it would have been challenged by now. If it's possible to disassemble, misconstrue, twiddle, and dittle the meaning of of the words in something as importaant as the constitution then all of the laws of our land mean nothing.
Any news from atny. VanIrion?
426am is correct...while it important from a symbolic standpoint to file these appeals and get a decision made at the highest level so we can show how our nation has been usurped and overthrown without a doubt. The final laugh will be when the SC refuses to hear it. By then who knows how many appointees will be Obama clones. Even John Roberts needs to be in prison.
THE REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND THE ADOPTION AND SCHOOL RECORDS MUST BE FOUND AND MADE PUBLIC. Without them, the endgame is Obama being President for this term, next term, and beyond. I simply cannot believe there is not someone with connections to get all this stuff made public. Without it, there will be no public outcry even though we all know Hussein Osama is not nbc and probably not even a US citizen in any form. Liberals do not care because saying something kills their voting base and the every day liberals hatred for rich people and themselves outweighs the Constitution.
Who is in charge of finding the documentation? That is where the main focus needs to be.
Is this the Georgia payoff?? Very close timing to the eligibility decision..... http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/09/10362722-us-licenses-first-nuclear-reactors-since-1978
A Comment From: http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/02/12/unc-tuition-hikes-university-of-nc-system-raises-tuition-costs-in-dismal-economy-working-students-and-families-pay-others-tuition-income-redistribution-unc-tuition-hikes-university-of-nc-system/#comments
"observer said:
February 12, 2012 at 10:27 am
I would assume that most of this has been revealed elsewhere but perhaps not comprehensively in such a report:
http://socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/2012/02/10/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born-in-hawaii-hospital-part-1/#more-7065
VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 1)
Posted on February 10, 2012
The Daily Pen
This is part one of a three part story which will present evidence discovered within the vital records archives of the United States, Great Britain and the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan which shows that Barack Obama exploited the municipality of Hawaii and U.S. Vital Statistics reporting methods in order to counterfeit birth records in a criminal attempt to deceive the American people and fraudulently usurp the power of the U.S. Presidency.
snip……As this report will show, the proof of Obama’s fraudulence resides in the domain of publicly accessible records which show that the birth registration procedures, federal vital statistics reporting methods and organizational structure of the Hawaiian municipality expose these contradictions and reveal that Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a fabrication of modern administrative processes and that his actual natal biography has been actively and intentionally obscured by present-day governmental officials."
From: http://obamaballotchallenge.com/existing-us-law-on-ins-gov-website-says-obama-is-ineligible
“EXISTING US LAW ON INS.GOV WEBSITE SAYS OBAMA IS INELIGIBLE”
Posted by By GeorgeM on 12 February, 2012
“On the eve of Obama’s eligibility hearing Leo Donofrio reveals a new nail in Obama’s coffin (from Sam Sewell’s Steady Drip blog. Sam is the Florida Project Manager for ObamaBallotChallenge.com)
Existing US Law on INS.gov Website Says Obama is Ineligible”
Please See:
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/
"OBAMA STILL POISED TO TAKE OVER CHURCHES AND ELIMINATE FIRST AMENDMENT"
Posted on February 11, 2012
Excerpt:
"[...] Question: Does anyone in this country still remember that the US Constitution is our foundational LEGAL document? And what is it about “no authority” that seems to confuse so many of the Obama media?
As I have written over and over again for years, if Obama is allowed to get away with flaunting the Constitution and its essential Bill of Rights, it’s as if our founding document no longer exists and Obama may now make up any law he wants to install.
But, as Congress continues to illegally give Obama more and more dictatorial powers (sadly, I wrote that—if Obama was elected—this would occur in October 2008), we have now reached the point that Obama is—fully—the Dictator-in-Chief of the USA. I have also written myriad columns warning that Obama is grabbing more and more power for himself, gutting more and more programs in order to pull in more and more money for himself and his friends yet, no one in Congress or the courts are even trying to stop him. And all too many of the former We-the-People will do anything about it.
As Obama continues to decimate our economy by destroying the US treasury and gut any of our remaining freedoms in order to force us into submission, I’m reminded of the tribes of Israel when they originally settled in Egypt. Genesis 47:19 states: “Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.” They were willing to become slaves to Pharaoh for bread and grain.
Knowing that Obama truly is the one who has systematically devastated our country—by design—in order to subjugate its people (he is a true Alinskyite) are we, nonetheless, now ready to be his slaves? Are you?"
See The Entire Article Here:
http://socialismisnottheanswer.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/obama-still-poised-to-take-over-churches-and-eliminate-first-amendment/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+SocialismIsNotTheAnswer+%28Socialism+is+not+the+Answer%29
@Anonymous
Wait until Obama runs for a third term and claims elections trump the constitution, just like the eligibility clause.
"You are correct. There have been twelve appeals presented to the US Supreme Court and 16 legal actions which include requests for injunctions and stays. The Supreme Court has denied them all without comment and not even one of the Justices has asked Obama to submit a brief in support of his eligibility to counter the briefs presented against him.
Any Justice can request a brief from the defendant ("Respondent")."
The only issue that has come before the Supreme Court is the issue of standing. That's it.
"VITAL RECORDS INDICATE OBAMA NOT BORN IN HAWAII HOSPITAL (PART 1)"
"This is part one of a three part story which will present evidence discovered within the vital records archives of the United States, Great Britain and the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan which shows that Barack Obama exploited the municipality of Hawaii and U.S. Vital Statistics reporting methods in order to counterfeit birth records in a criminal attempt to deceive the American people and fraudulently usurp the power of the U.S. Presidency."
By Penbrook Johannson
of THE DAILY PEN
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Must Read The Entire Article Here:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born.html
* * * *
"EXCLUSIVE: TIM ADAMS' MASTER THESIS,
“THERE IS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR OBAMA"
THE POST & EMAIL'S
BLOG OF THE DAY
By WTPOTUS, ©WTPOTUS 2011
"(Aug. 15, 2011) — In the Words of Tim Adams; His Master’s Thesis states,
“There is No Birth Certificate for Obama!”
“There Isn’t One!”
“He’s Lied About Being Born in a Hospital in Hawaii.”
See The Entire Article Here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/08/15/exclusive-tim-adams-master-thesis-%E2%80%9Cthere-is-no-birth-certificate-for-obama%E2%80%9D/
* * * *
WORLDNETDAILY EXCLUSIVE
"HAWAII OFFICIAL NOW SWEARS: NO OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE"
"SIGNS AFFIDAVIT DECLARING LONG-FORM, HOSPITAL-GENERATED DOCUMENT ABSENT"
Published: 01/24/2011 at 8:48 PM
By Jerome R. Corsi
See The Entire Article Here:
http://www.wnd.com/2011/01/254401/
* * * *
WORLDNETDAILY EXCLUSIVE
"HAWAII ELECTIONS CLERK: OBAMA NOT BORN HERE"
"OFFICIAL WHO OVERSAW BALLOTS IN 2008 RACE SAYS HOSPITAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE NON-EXISTENT"
Published: 06/10/2010 at 3:39 AM
By Joe Kovacs
See The Entire Article Here:
http://www.wnd.com/2010/06/165041/
* * * *
WORLDNETDAILY EXCLUSIVE
"HAWAII ELECTIONS CLERK:
[THE SERIAL CRIMINAL] OBAMA 'CAUGHT [CONSTANTLY LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S FACES ABOUT HIS CURRENT LEGAL INDONESIAN CITIZENSHIP. SOEBARKAH - BARRY SOETORO ALIAS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II IS CAUGHT LYING BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS 100% OF HIS ENTIRE SELF-REPORTED & SELF-VETTED PERSONAL LEGAL NARRATIVE HISTORY IS 100% COMPLETELY FAKE & 100% FRAUDULENT...OBAMA IS A 100% CON-ARTIST, A 100% MANIAC SERIAL CAREER CRIMINAL WHO IS A 100% SERIAL LIAR, AND A 100% DANGEROUS, EVIL, AMORAL, MEGALOMANIAC, 100% CRIMINAL SOCIOPATH PSYCHOPATH WHO IS 100% CAUGHT] FIBBING'"
"BUT WILL [THE MANIAC SERIAL CAREER CRIMINAL] pRESIDENT BE 'FROG-MARCHED FROM [OUR OVAL OFFICE - OUR WHITE HOUSE'] OVER [HIS CURRENT LEGAL FOREIGN INDONESIAN CITIZENSHIP] ELIGIBILITY ISSUE?"
Published: 04/06/2011 at 7:11 PM
By Joe Kovacs
See The Entire Article Here:
http://www.wnd.com/2011/04/283865/
Did they file an appeal today?
Orly beat the other guys and filed her appeal.
Case number# 2012CV211398
"THE OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES: A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE"
Excerpt:
"The recent development of the state ballot challenges represents the right of the people to remove the doubt. Petitioners are demanding that evidence that meets the standard of courtroom admissibility, if it does exist, be produced to confirm Obama’s eligibility.
If Obama is not willing to be completely transparent, then he should step down. To the bewilderment of his sycophants, the cloud of skepticism hanging over Obama’s head is commensurate to his unique background, not his skin color. No one doubted the eligibility of Jesse Jackson, Alan Keyes, Al Sharpton, or Herman Cain.
Doubt remains because, legally speaking, Obama hasn’t “released” anything. To meet a basic legal standard of evidentiary competence and admissibility, certified paper copies must be produced, and the original document in Hawaii must be made available for the states.
Rather than produce irrefutable evidence, Obama posted a “highly suspicious” image of a birth certificate on the internet."
Read More Here: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_obama_ballot_challenges_a_crisis_of_confidence.html
@Anonymous
Ask and you shall receive...
OUR APPEAL WAS TIMELY FILED IN FULTON COUNTY GA SUPERIOR COURT (ELECTION APPEALS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FILED IN FULTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT). THE CASE WAS ASSIGNED TO THE CHIEF JUDGE CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31627
@Anonymous
Orly's is on the docket, but she's going to have some problems with meeting the pro hac vice requirements.
Nothing on the public docket for anyone else as of closing time.
@Anonymous
"The only issue that has come before the Supreme Court is the issue of standing. That's it."
---
Since the Supreme Court has denied all the Petitions for Writs of Certiorari, the reasons for the lower courts' rejections, such as standing never even got a chance to be raised.
In order to rule on whether a lower court was correct to dismiss a lawsuit on grounds of standing, the Supreme Court would have to agree to accept a case.
@Anonymous
"426am is correct...while it important from a symbolic standpoint to file these appeals and get a decision made at the highest level so we can show how our nation has been usurped and overthrown without a doubt. The final laugh will be when the SC refuses to hear it. By then who knows how many appointees will be Obama clones. Even John Roberts needs to be in prison.
THE REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND THE ADOPTION AND SCHOOL RECORDS MUST BE FOUND AND MADE PUBLIC. Without them, the endgame is Obama being President for this term, next term, and beyond. I simply cannot believe there is not someone with connections to get all this stuff made public. Without it, there will be no public outcry even though we all know Hussein Osama is not nbc and probably not even a US citizen in any form. Liberals do not care because saying something kills their voting base and the every day liberals hatred for rich people and themselves outweighs the Constitution.
Who is in charge of finding the documentation? That is where the main focus needs to be."
---
I'm betting that Obama has had all those records destroyed years ago. That's why no one has uncovered anything.
A question. Doesn't the appeal have to be heard before the March 6 primary date to keep it from being considered a moot point?
I'm afraid Orly doesn't stand a chance with Judge Wright in GA.
http://www.topix.com/forum/state/ga/T92KI6A4GKB7NM00E
I do not know if this is something that could be used to force a sitting President to prove himself eligible to hold the office but if someone smarter than I am with regard to the law could advise I would be very interested to know.
There is an option to use citizen complaint to invoke a Grand Jury Investigation that would investigate, in this case whether Mr. Obama and the people who conspired with him to cover his ineligibility broke the law in doing so.
This site explains this in much more complete detail.
http://hidden4thbranch.com/?page_id=305
This particular brand deals with Voter Fraud as it pertains to the Republican Primaries. What I am wondering is if this could be tailored to fit the current dilema with regard to our sitting president's sealed records and eligibility to be President?
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
I am forced to moderate the comments at this site due to the Obama defenders constant porn spam and threatening comments.