NBC's Savannah Guthrie Unintentionally Proves
Obama Birth Certificate Tampered With
Obama Birth Certificate Tampered With
Mark Gillar @ Tea Party Power Hour
On April 29, 2011, Barack Obama presented the world with what he said was an electronic copy of his certified birth certificate. Savannah Guthrie of NBC was allowed to hold the document and take a picture of it. Unfortunately, as computer expert Tom Harrison recently pointed out, the certified copy she photographed does not match the scan of the certified copy made available for download at whitehouse.gov.
The certified copy Ms. Guthrie photographed is the same certified copy that Obama white house officials scanned into a computer and posted for download at whitehouse.gov.
After downloading the file from whitehouse.gov and importing it into Adobe Illustrator, one need only to release the clipping mask in order to see two pieces of vital statistics coding not present on the original Ms. Guthrie photographed. A clipping mask that hides information is in and of itself a clear sign of document tampering, but we'll save that for another day.
Since it is impossible to scan a document and have additional information show up on the computer file that was not on the original, one must conclude that the electronic file Obama released has been tampered with and that the computer file might be the parent of the certified paper copy instead of the other way around. It also opens the possibility that yet another electronic file constructed on computer is the parent of both the certified copy Ms. Guthrie photographed and the electronic file posted on whitehouse.gov. Regardless of the exact cause of this anomaly, one this is for certain: The certified copy of Obama's birth certificate photographed by Ms. Guthrie cannot be the parent of the electronic scan posted for download at whitehouse.gov.
(VIDEO BELOW) To examine the Guthrie photo and the scan made available from whitehouse.gov go to http://www.teapartypowerhour.com/coding.
If you'd like to see Congress investigate this matter, sign the petition at http://wwwcongressdoyourjob.com
WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html
SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html


33 comments:
Yes, we know, it's phony. But that's not the question.
The question is whether there is a single person in the US who can or will do anything about it.
Isn't all of this scanning harmful to the atmosphere or something?
Thank you for doing the birthers a nice favor, Guthrie. That'll teach you for being so gullible and such a shameless lackey for the illegal president.
Yo, morons, there were two certified copies produced by Hawaii. It is entirely possible that the one that was scanned in was not the same one that was at the Press Conference. In addition, it is very possible that material that cannot be seen on an original can be seen on copied or scanned version.
There is no difference between the two documents.
"The certified copy of Obama's birth certificate photographed by Ms. Guthrie cannot be the parent of the electronic scan posted for download at whitehouse.gov."
That's ridiculous. We already know that the PDF was altered after the docuemtn was scanned, why should it be the same as the original document, in fact it should be. Those pencil marks(?) are not even within the borders of the original birth certificate and unlike the other pencil marks are not associated with information field.
@www.wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com/blog
It can lead to Global Layering.
I think that the copy that Savannah Guthrie got was a copy of something that was manufactured. I think it was also computer generated and the seal was a fake seal. She is full of baloney being all giddy about something that is computer-generated forgery. They must have made a special copy for her that didn't have the smiley face on it and printed it out saying it is the original. She is a total fool.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/arizona-secretary-of-state-ken-bennett-satisfied-obama-was-born-in-united-states/2012/05/23/gJQAN1czkU_blog.html
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/05/23/arizona_official_confirms_obama_will_be_on_ballot.html
I'd like to see the travel records of whoever went and got it last year.
You can have any Embossing Seal made for about $40.00
http://www.thestampmaker.com/Departments/Embossers-and-Seals/Seal-Stamps/Notary-Stamps-and-Seals/Hawaii.aspx
great report mark, but it was april 27th, i think. cheers, scott e.
Maybe I'm blind but I've never seen a seal of any type on any image of any alleged copy of Obama's alleged long-form birth certificate, including the images at the link above ( http://www.teapartypowerhour.com/coding).
Would someone please be kind enough to post a link to an image showing same? Thank you.
http://4peoplewhothink.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/the-belief-factor-by-dan-lynch/
@RacerJim
Zoom in on the image taken by Savanah Guthrie
http://lockerz.com/s/96540937
Also adjust the contrast on the White House pdf and you can make out the seal.
@Torch n PitchForks
And you can buy green basketweave security paper.
So they took the long form BC from the Associated Press
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/ap_obama_certificate_dm_110427.pdf
Copied it onto green security paper and then stamped it with a raised seal and then scanned that into the computer to make the pdf.
That's why Sheriff Joe's investigation is on the wrong track. The pdf is meaningless. He should subpoena the document that Guthrie photographed.
@torch. Yes, you are correct. Now let's play devil's advocate and assume that someone did just that. Can you please explain to me why the Hawaiian DOH would put a link to the document on the WH website indicating that it is a certified copy of the original lfbc if the seal was from one purchased by someone trying to commit fraud?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55584305/LFBC-Seal-Revealed
@Torch n PitchForks
Yeah, and notice how you can only barely make out the circle and none of the lettering. What a coincidence.
@AnonymousWell beyond what was shown in this video, is the fact when you download this fake from the government's own site and open it in Adobe Illustrator there are over 20 layers (aka edits) and the signature is a solid black line where the individual pixels should go from light to dark to light when looking at the edge, center, other edge of the signature line.
The Saul Alinsky commie protectors of this scum of a president cannot refute this without lying but that is what they do.
@Anonymous
Anon 12:48
Precisely. Why would Hawaii direct you to the White House web site, instead of posting their own image?
Clearly what they are saying is: This is what THEY posted. If you want to look at it, go there, we wash our hands.
They have been parsing words and jumping through loops to avoid making a definitive statement.
The verification that they sent to Bennett, is the first time that they actually stuck their neck out.
Re: "Why would Hawaii direct you to the White House web site, instead of posting their own image?"
Because posting their own image would be illegal under the state's privacy regulations. Hawaii can only send copies of the birth certificate to people. It cannot show those birth certificates itself, not even if is given permission by the individual.
The verification that they gave to Bennett is of course considerably more detailed in the past, since he asked detailed questions. But the key fact, that Obama had a birth certificate issued by Hawaii has been confirmed repeatedly--before the election, after the election, by the former governor (a Republican) by the former director of health again informally in an interview, by the "Index Data" (a public document that shows that there is a file for Obama) and by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
SIMPLE:
There is a forged document in their files. Corsi was on the phone with a mole inside the records office. The mole said it wasn't there one day then the next day it was. The mole even talked to Corsi from the vault where the records are kept while he was looking at the records.
Since the document released by the WH in 2011 has been proven to be a forgery, Hawaii is simply perpetuating the lie. They’re stuck with it.
Ignore and give up on Hawaii.
All you get when you go there is a big "lei."
@Anonymous
Sure, we gotta believe Corsi's mole. Or Corsi's claim of a mole. We just gotta believe Corsi.
No we don't. The "Index Data" has been on public display for years, and it shows a birth certificate file for Obama opened in 1961. This is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 (which at the time were sent to the newspapers only by the DOH).
This of course is in addition to the two Republican officials, the former Republican governor the current governor and the current director of health.
@Anonymous
...must have made a special copy for her that didn't have the smiley face on it...She is a total fool.
She's the total fool?
The Republican governor never saw the BC. She relied on the word of someone else. Go look it up. Gov. Abercrombie said there was no BC on file. Former Elections Supv. Tim Adams said in 2008 that he and his boss went looking for the BC and it was nowhere to be found, even inquiring of both hospitals in question. Neither Queens nor Kapi'olani has a record of Barry or Stanley Ann ever being there. Kapi'olani has never acknowledged that he was born there. The hospital has only shown a letter written by Barry congratulating them on their anniversary and he claims in that letter that he was born there.
Has anyone alerted Arpaio's office that he should subpoena the copy of the BC that Guthrie photographed?
@Anonymous
...there are over 20 layers (aka edits) and the signature is a solid black line where the individual pixels should go from light to dark to light when looking at the edge, center, other edge of the signature line.
And a smiley face. Don't forget the smiley face.
@Anonymous
The DOH verified that Kapiolani was the hospital.
@Anonymous May 23, 2012 12:30 PM
"@RacerJim
Zoom in on the image taken by Savanah Guthrie
http://lockerz.com/s/96540937
Also adjust the contrast on the White House pdf and you can make out the seal."
@Pixel Patriot May 23, 2012 1:15 PM
"http://www.scribd.com/doc/55584305/LFBC-Seal-Revealed"
Really? Here's a legendary John McEnroe quote: "You Can't Be Serious!"
Here's a link to a serious comparison: http://www.wnd.com/2011/05/298537/
@Anonymous May 23, 2012 8:52 PM
"The DOH verified that Kapiolani was the hospital."
HDOH regulations in effect around the time Obama et al claim he was born in Hawaii did not require being born in a hospital in order for a hospital to be officially considered/named by the HDOH as their place of birth.
Barack Obama and his half-sister Maya Soetoro both first individually claimed he was born in Queens Medical Center but subsequently agreed he was born in Kapiolani.
Soon after Obama's inauguration an alleged White House letter from Obama naming Kapiolani as his birth hospital appeared on Kapiolani's web-site but it disappeared about six-months later when it was proven to be a forgery.
No one at either Kapiolani or Queens, or any other medical facility in Hawaii for that matter, has publically claimed Obama was born there.
The HDOH has verified all sorts of things about Obama but has yet to allow any independent verification of anything about Obama.
@RacerJim
From the linkyou provided,
"Update:While no seal can be seen in the image of the purported birth certificate released by the White House, MSNBC reporter Savannah Guthrie tweeted that she was given access to the actual paper document and that she has seen and felt the seal.
Guthrie further posted a photograph of the document, in which a raised seal can seen but not clearly read."
So the document does have a raised seal.
Can you read the seals in the wnd pictur (the one that is not a negative image)?
@RacerJim
"HDOH regulations in effect around the time Obama et al claim he was born in Hawaii did not require being born in a hospital in order for a hospital to be officially considered/named by the HDOH as their place of birth."
Read the birth certificate:
7a. Name of Hospital or Institution (If not in hospital or institution, give address)
Since the Hospital name is listed and not a home address that is where the birth took place.
Or do thing that the grandparents went into the DOH and said 'Our daughter just had a baby at home
but put down Kapiolani Hospital'?
Can you actually cite Obama or Maya saying he was born at Queen's?
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.