Gary Kreep clinches win for judge
by Greg Moran @ San Diego Union-Tribune
SAN DIEGO — Gary Kreep, a Ramona lawyer who has long worked on controversial conservative legal causes such as challenging President Barack Obama's birth certificate, clinched a win for a seat on the San Diego Superior Court Tuesday.
Kreep, 61, has a lead of 1,569 votes over veteran prosecutor Garland Peed. There are 1,000 ballots left to count, meaning there is no way Peed can catch Kreep.
"I feel very blessed," Kreep, a devout Christan, said. "I'm extremely gratified by all the people who stuck their neck out to vote for me."
CONTINUED HERE: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jun/19/gary-kreep-clinches-win-for-judge
KPBS Interviews Eligibility Attorney and San Diego Superior Court Judge Candidate Gary Kreep - VIDEO HERE. Hat tip SA.
WATCH THE COMPLETE SHERIFF JOE PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT OBAMA'S FORGED IDENTITY DOCUMENTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/joe.html
SHERIFF JOE TEA-PARTY PRESENTATION VIDEO HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/arizonavideo.html
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
20 comments:
wow
I am happy for him.
Way to go Gary!
Off subject..tired of fox news plugging Rubio for vp choise..I think we need to flood the RNC with emails telling them that we who uphold the constitution will stay home on election day if they choose to put up a candidate who is not a NBC.
great how do i get case before him ??
Obama give up. lol
I would love to see moochelle escorted out of the whitehouse I dislike her even more than her muslim husband,
"The longest journey begins with a single step..."
Clean up one court at a time.The elections at this level still work. It would be great if they weren't rigged at the higher levels.
We are thankful for the victories ongoing.
Ya but Kreep is avoiding the NBC issue, which is separate from the birth certificate! Holy molee, and around and around it goes! As in not forward!
Great so we have a single judge that has already stated that he isn't afraid of the big bad wolf? Even though all other judges have proven that they are?
Get a case before him and let obama aka bounel go down in flames.
Congrats Gary!
RED ALERT!!!!
STEALTH COMMUNIST BARACK HUSSIEN OBAMA IS TRYING TO UNILATERALLY DISARM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN PREPARATION FOR A COMMUNIST TAKE OVER.
http://freebeacon.com/a-cut-too-far/
@Anonymous @ 8:59
"great how do i get case before him ??"
Get yourself arrested for DUI in San Diego County.
Kreep is quoted as saying that you DO NOT need two citizen parents to be an NBC.
You said:tell fox I won't vote for Mitt if he picks Rubio, think about this; Do you think the Saudi's want us to drill our own oil? Ofcorce not.So u would think the Saudi's would want Obama to win right? Guess who pays the talkin heads at fox? Mr. Big bucks--Saudi Prince Awaleed Bin Talal, even Hannity has said, I think Mitt should pick Rubio. They put on a good act but they are getting paid alot to throw the election to Obama. Think about how we got here with Romney. Fox was in the tank for Romney from the start. They persuaded a bunce of people to vote for Romney. I haven't talked to one person that wanted Romney. Now they try to persuade viewers that Rubio is the best Vp choice knowing that if Mitt picks Rubio he will loose. They say Rubio is tea party favorite. That's true but not for Vp. most tea party groups I know have already boycotted fox. They don't even plan to support Romney in Nov. Fox is the worst enemy conservatives have. You know that Spanish co. That will be counting the ballots in Nov? It says has ties to Soros. If u google the name of that Spanish co. there's an article there- facts and fiction. The article says it's fiction that Soros has any ties to the co. The article is by Michell Malkin. guess where she works? Fox, remember Major Garett? He and Glen Beck quit Fox about the same time b/c they wouldn't bend and kiss the Prince's ring. Like Santorum said, Romney is the WORST Republican to run against Fagama. they took Newt and Ron Paul off the air and if Santorum was still in I bet he would be off the air too. Remember 2days before the Alabama vote Newt was 4 points ahead in the polls. Hannity got Santorum on the air and played that nasty Bill Myar crap for Rick. Fox played that crap for the next 2 days. Rick won Ala. That ended Newt' chance. Rick didn't win Luisiana, Ron Paul did in fact Ron Paul won about 7 states but they gave Mitt the delagates. When Trump endorsed Mitt he said it was because Mitt's parents where both US citizens when Mitt was born. I wonder if Trump will withdraw his support if Mitt picks Rubio. Since Reince Preibus took over the RNC they act like communist. I wonder if the Prince is paying him too. When the convention comes RonPaul said he was suing the GOP. they said at that time West or Palin might come out and run against Romney. I bet if that happened Fox wouldn't put them on TV. just wanted your thought on this. Bye
AN OUTSTANDING MUST READ VERY INFORMATIVE ARTICLE!!
"OBAMA'S MURDERGATE: FAST AND FURIOUS INVESTIGATION TO CONTINUE REGARDLESS OF CONTEMPT VOTE"
Katie Pavlich
News Editor, Townhall
June 20, 2012
"UPDATE: 4:14 PM: Attorney General Eric Holder has been voted in contempt of Congress by the House Oversight Committee by 23-17. The vote came down after three Demcratic amendments to the contempt charge were voted down. An amendment introduced by Rep. Trey Gowdy rendering President Obama's invokation executive privilege not applicable or relevant to this case at this time. The contempt charge will now move to the House floor.
Capitol Hill - Attorney General Eric Holder got a temporary lifeline from President Obama today just minutes before the House Oversight Committee started debate over whether to hold Holder in contempt with a vote. [...].
The assertion of executive privilege came after Holder failed to produce 1300 Fast and Furious documents and asked Chairman Issa to drop the Congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious at a meeting yesterday.
“Brian Terry has been dead over 500 days now and nobody has been held accountable,” Rep. Buerkle said. “The lack of transparency with the death of a Border Patrol Agent is sickening.”
* Executive privilege is used to keep communications directly involving the President confidential. The fact that the president invoked it for Holder today at the very last minute raises more questions about who in the White House knew what and when about Operation Fast and Furious.
“For the first 11 months, the administration denied participation in this,” Rep. Mica said. “This is a sad day when Barack Obama would exert himself at the last minute.”
* President Obama has claimed he knew nothing about the program before the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December 2010. He first spoke about the topic during an interview with Univision in March 2011, yet Holder said didn't "know" about the program until May 2011.
* "The assertion of executive privilege raises monumental questions. How can the President assert executive privilege if there was no White House involvement? How can the President exert executive privilege over documents he's supposedly never seen? Is something very big being hidden to go to this extreme? The contempt citation is an important procedural mechanism in our system of checks and balances. The questions from Congress go to determining what happened in a disastrous government program for accountability and so that it's never repeated again," said a statement from Senator Charles Grassley, who has been investigating the scandal.
* Speaker John Boehner accused the White House of engaging in a cover-up of the Fast and Furious program.
* "The White House decision to invoke executive privilege implies that White House officials were either involved in the ‘Fast and Furious’ operation or the cover-up that followed. The Administration has always insisted that wasn't the case. Were they lying, or are they now bending the law to hide the truth?" Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck said in a statement.
* The White House defended the move. Despite President Obama’s previous claims he knew nothing about Fast and Furious, at least three of his senior White House national security advisors received emails about the program, including Obama’s Senior Advisor to Latin America Dan Restrepo.
* “Now, was fighting the drug gangs at the border a sensitive national security matter? And, if so was the President of the United States of America personally involved in making decisions as to how to conduct that fight? If that’s the case, this has reached a different level and we now know why the attorney general has ferociously defended these documents,” Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Fox News."
Con't 1 of 2
“OBAMA’S MURDERGATE: FAST AND FURIOUS INVESTIGATION TO CONTINUE REGARDLESS OF CONTEMPT VOTE”
Katie Pavlich
News Editor, Townhall
June 20, 2012
Con't 2 of 2
* “The Attorney General is not above the law,” Rep. Scott DesJarlais said, while Rep. Gosar added, “Finding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt is long overdue.”
[...]
* Gowdy presented multiple pieces of evidence to justify contempt and to prove the Justice Department has been less than honest in its response to Congressional inquiries.
* “This was not Mr. Chairman as initially the administration mantra an Arizona investigation. Senior level officials within the Department of Justice in Washington knew about Fast and Furious well before Special Agent Brian Terry was murdered. Senior level DOJ officials were briefed, they discussed press conference opportunities, they discussed the unsealing of indictments, they traded emails about the status of the case, they approved wiretap applications and most significantly Mr. Chairman they actively discussed the tactic of gunwalking well in advice of Special Agent Brian Terry’s murder,” Gowdy said.
* Issa said that a contempt vote will not be the end to his investigation into the Department of Justice on this issue.”
Please Read The Entire Article Here:
http://townhall.com/columnists/katiepavlich/2012/06/20/obamas_murdergate_attorney_general_eric_holder_held_in_contempt/page/full/
Get This ******* Information To Larry Klayman, Esq. and to Mr. Mike Voeltz:
"Motion to dismiss FL challenge was based on the same argument that got the case dismissed in the Superior court of GA and the Supreme court of GA. Judge asked for proposed judgment to be submitted to him for signature"
Posted on | June 18, 2012
"Today Obama’s attorneys argued exactly the same point that got the case dismissed in the Superior court of GA and the Supreme court of GA.
Obama’s attorneys stated that until the declaration of nominee is signed by the convention, Obama is not the party nominee. They stated that Hillary Clinton won the FL primary in 2008, but was not the Democratic nominee in 2008 general election. They also argued that on the Republican side Romney won some states and Santorum won some states and Gingrich won some states, but until the certificate of candidate is not signed, either one of them is not the nominee.
In GA Supreme court this argument was the reason for dismissal of Farrar et al v Obama et al. Of course, I am sure some other excuse will be used after the convention. Judge Lewis asked for proposed ruling to be submitted to him for signature within 1 week."
From:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=116261
Comments Under The Above Link:
"Ed O.
June 18th, 2012 @ 9:57 pm
Isn’t there an attorney smart enough to argue that our voting process starts with supposedly qualified people at the primary elections. Should an unqualified person win the primary, as is the case with Obama, and the other candidates who ran in the primary then quit the race, then at the convention the unqualified person who won the primary is found to be disqualified as Obama should be,
who then becomes the candidate? That would be a dysfunctional voting process. In other words stop the nonsense before it starts at the primary."
* * * * * * * * * * * *
******* "scott
June 19th, 2012 @ 3:12 am
These motions to dismiss, just prove that Obama has nothing to show. Simply producing a certified sealed copy of his BC from HI would end all the court cases – yet he is unable to do so.
Obama wants to stall all court challenges. Until after the elections. Then God forbid he should be re-elected, he will use the standing argument again saying the election is over balha blah blah and it’s groundhog day all over again.
Perhaps the Court should order Obama to submit his documents now – to be opened only if he is the nominee and dismiss the case if he is not the nominee. Sort of like posting a bond
The debate process for the Democratic nominee is OVER, there is no challenger. Both parties have their nominee and the conventions are just an out dated formality. It’s like saying we don’t know what time the sun is going to rise in the morning because it hasn’t happened yet.
Time for Obama to step down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
* * * * * * * * * * * *
******* "scott
June 19th, 2012 @ 3:45 am
April 04, 2012 USA TODAY ARTICLE:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/04/this-just-in-obama-clinches-democratic-nomination/1
IT’S OFFICIAL OBAMA CLINCHES DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION
On April 4th Obama obtained the convention delegates needed to cinch the Democratic nomination. His lawyers can point to elections where one candidate won a particular states delegates and did not go on to receive the nomination……. But they can not point to any candidate that WON the needed delegates to be the nominee and was not nominated at the party convention. Once the majority of delegates is obtained, there is NO POSSIBILITY for anyone else to be the nominee other than the winner. In this case Obama is the Democrat NOMINEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" *******
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Oh here we go again. It goes like this.
Knock Knock
Whos there?
Obamas Thugs.
Oh ok i changed my mind.
I can't wait for Orly Taitz to file an eligibility claim in front of Kreep's Family Court.
PLEASE, God, let it be so!!
Add the Southern Poverty Law Center to the list of people underwhelmed by Judge Gary Kreep (ugh)
"Kreep, who in recent years has received national attention for filing numerous “birther” lawsuits claiming baselessly that President Obama is constitutionally ineligible for office because he is supposedly not a U.S. citizen, is no government lawyer.
He is, however, founder and head the United States Justice Foundation (USJF), an anti-Muslim hate group that insists Muslim terrorists, with Obama’s help, are engaged in a campaign to destroy the U.S. Constitution and establish a government based on Islamic Shariah law.
In a 2011 fundraising letter for USJF, Kreep suggested that the president is a “stealth jihadist,” Marxist, and “strident enemy of America,” who “is working to destroy our sovereign republic.”
“When you put together the puzzle pieces, the picture becomes clear: Barack Obama hates America … and you!” he wrote."
The one bright spot is that Judge Kreep (sounds like someone from a Western movie) can't continue to play birther games as an attorney, and is pretty limited to what he can play as a judge.
"As a Superior Court judge, Kreep will no longer be permitted to represent clients as an attorney. He will also be required to abide by California’s Code of Judicial Ethics, which, among other things, notes that “expressions of bias or prejudice by a judge, even outside the judge’s judicial activities, may cast reasonable doubt on the judge’s capacity to act impartially.”
So, how many minutes before he violates that??
"Philip Carrizosa, a spokesperson for the California Administrative Office of the Courts, told Hatewatch that sitting judges may not engage in political activism, except as it pertains to the administration of justice. Asked if challenging the president of the United States’ citizenship would be considered unacceptable political activism, Carrizosa said, “He would have to cease doing that."
Betcha he doesn't.
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.