100% Proof Rick Santorum Not A Natural Born Citizen. Father Naturalized
3 yrs After Rick Was Born. FOIA Response Re Aldo Santorum
3 yrs After Rick Was Born. FOIA Response Re Aldo Santorum
By CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
See the FOIA response documents re Aldo Santorum’s 1961 citizenship application here (and below): http://www.scribd.com/doc/108907280/100-Proof-Rick-Santorum-Not-a-Natural-Born-Citizen-Father-naturalized-3-yrs-after-Rick-was-born-FOIA-Response-Re-Aldo-Santorum
Flashback to the primary election in the spring of 2012 and Rick Santorum’s reluctance to come clean on questions about when his father naturalized: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/rick-santorum-still-refusing-to-provide-copies-of-naturalization-papers-proving-his-father-was-a-u-s-citizen-when-rick-was-born
More information on the Santorum research from this past spring: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/pietro-santorum-ricks-grandfather-became-a-naturalized-u-s-citizen-on-14-may-1930
# # # #
Also, read more about Obama’s ID crimes and his constitutional ineligibility here: http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections
When will we return to the rule of law and enforce our identity theft protection laws and U.S. Constitution in regards to the Identity-Fraud-in-Chief residing in the White House?
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections
WATCH SHERIFF JOE'S 2ND OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
100% Proof Rick Santorum Not a Natural Born Citizen. Father naturalized 3 yrs after Rick was born. FOIA Re...
New Ad - AZ Sheriff Arpaio - Obama Birth Cert & Draft Reg Card Are Forged! Wash Times Natl Wkly - 12 Ma...
20 comments:
I never thought Rick was a natural born citizen. That's why he didn't get my vote. At least Rubio knows he's not a natural born Citizen, so we don't have to go through it with him.
These dual citizens assholes think the world revolves around them.
WOW !!!!!!
Romney is demolishing Obama!
Obama is way out of his league debating a real businessman!
obama got schooled, and he does not realize it, that smug motherf____. that grin will come off his face when he loses the whitecrib and pimpforce one.
Ya know, Charlie, except for a few people no one really cares about your definition of NBC. And I doubt the entire Republican Party was engaged in a massive conspiracy. Either in 2008 or 2012. They just are competent enough to keep anything secret.
Ah, the Vattelist distraction again.
So the country would be better protected if "President Santorum"'s father had naturalized 3 years earlier? Why? Does Italy control who can be our President?
Kerchner is one of the worst Obots and should concentrate on *actual* and *factual* ways to remove "Obama".
When has Rubio who is not a natural born citizen admitted he is not? I am a fan of Rubio but not as a presidential or vice presidential candidate.
reply to Anon 8:08pm- I beg to differ. Boehner and every GOP CONgress member have rec'd thousands of faxes, letters, calls, and personal visits to offices. They ALL know barry soetero is illegally occupying, usurping, his forged, fraudulently obtained position as putative president.
They ALL bundle! (the talking points)
@Anonymous
"They just are competent enough to keep anything secret."
Inconsistency is one of the eight traits of a disinformationalist, according to H. Michael Sweeney. "There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within."
Now, I don't know jack about Sweeney but I've seen you anonymous Obots make the kind of "mistake" that you made here that he may just be on to something about you idiots. Besides, it's not right to use his words without giving him credit.
Moderator Where is my comment?
Lazar as far as I know Rubio has not admitted that. I liked him too but now I see him as a traitor.
Dr. Benjamin Franklin, the Continental Congress and the framers of the Constition (to name a few) were all "Vattelists."
@AnonymousYou mean; that NATURAL "distraction", AGAIN
The is what's so great about nature --no avoiding its truth
and would the United States be safer if RS's father had naturalized 3 years earlier?
Answer: a resounding "YES"!
FOR IF YOU PERMIT RS to slide as with bo jr you "make eligible" any child of a NON-IMMIGRANT to the United States, NON-U.S. CITIZEN, FOREIGN NATIONAL so long as they have the woman drop the kid within U.S. territorial limits
What imbeciles such as you cannot see is that it is not about any one particular individual but about "who comes next"
@lazer73
"fan of Rubio"?!
You should make clear to put that in the past tense
Rubio is a hypocrite and a colossal liar
He had a chance to educate Americans, take down the USURPER and instead he opts to protect his own selfish interests
how 'bout that lame Convention speech that will be remembered for how he just had to remind US of what a great family man bo was
What a joke, this Rubio fake turned out to be
@anon 2:49 I'll have to agree. When I found out that Rubio used tax payer $$ to pay off his home and the fact that his own power is more inportant to him than we the people I lost all respect for him. He is a traitor to the constitution and the people.
Although I agree with those who argue that a natural-born citizen is someone born to parents who are citizens of the U.S., recent court decisions seem to say that if a person is born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. then that person, regardless of the citizenship of his or her parents, is a natural-born citizen. For example, here are four recent state court pronouncements:
1.) Ankeny v. Daniels, Indiana Court of Appeals (2009)
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
2.) Tisdale v. Obama, Virginia federal court (2012)
"It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens."
3.) Purpora V. Obama 2012
"No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a 'natural born Citizen' due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father."
4.) Allen v. Obama, Arizona (2012)
"Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise."
I don't understand what's going on. If these judges are wrong, that is, if they've misinterpreted the law, why haven't Orly Taitz, Mario Appuzo, or other attorney's in the eligibility movement taken their lawsuits to the Supreme Court? Certainly there are justices on the S.C. who oppose Obama, aren't there? If the S.C. has refused to hear their cases, does that mean they agree with the state judges' decisions?
> why haven't Orly Taitz, Mario Appuzo, or other attorney's in the eligibility movement taken their lawsuits to the Supreme Court
Several "birther" cases have reached SCOTUS (including some alleging the Vattelist theory), SCOTUS has consistently denied cert in all those cases, thereby effectively ruling there is no controversy, therefore no lower court ruling was "against SCOTUS precedent", therefore the "SCOTUS precedent" claim is wrong.
Now you may count SCOTUS among the conspirators, but that doesn't really help any of us, does it?
I mean, at what point do we realize a certain approach was simply WRONG?
Do we believe a couple of incompetent lawyers (Orly, Van Irion, Apuzzo) or the clear majority of legal scholars and courts?
And even IF there is some massive conspiracy that involves ALL courts, what good does taking this to court do then anyway?
We're pursuing a lost case with Vattelism either way.
> Certainly there are justices on the S.C. who oppose Obama, aren't there?
Even if there was just one, all he needed to do was make a public comment (unrelated to "Obama") that he thinks NBC means two citizen parents and the sh*tstorm would begin. So obviously there is none.
> What imbeciles such as you cannot see is that it is not about any one particular individual but about "who comes next"
Huh? So you say Osama bin Laden's son cannot sneak into the US, naturalize and then have a child with another naturalized Afghan woman, making the child an NBC by your Vattelist standards?
As long as you make up contrived scenarios where "born in the country" is allegedly unsafe, I can make up one where "born in the country to citizen parents" is just as unsafe.
Therefore your argument "it is possible that ..., therefore the Founders meant ..." is pretty much moot.
Besides, the fact that the 2nd Amendment allows you to buy an AK-47 and mow down dozens of people in the mall doesn't mean the Founders only wanted us to own muskets that take a minute to reload for a second shot, does it?
If you want to promote Vattelism, at least make a legal argument about it and not some vague appeal to common sense.
I don’t get it
Does this site have a page on Facebook?
Post a Comment
“As long as I am an American citizen and American blood runs in these veins I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject.” - Elijah Parish Lovejoy(1802-1837)
Comments posted here do not necessarily reflect the views of BirtherReport.com. Readers are solely responsible for the content of the comments they post on this web site.