9th Circuit To Hear Emergency Petition For Default In Obama Identity Fraud Challenge
Ninth Circuit To Hear Emergency Petition For
Default Judgment In Obama Identity Fraud Challenge
Previous reports on the Grinols v Electoral College Obama identity fraud challenge can be found here.
EXCERPT VIA DR. TAITZ'S PRESS RELEASE:
"9th Circuit Court of Appeals to hear an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus for expedited Default Judgment against Barack Obama. Notice of Default was filed a month ago with the US District Court for the Eastern District of California, judge Morrison C. England, who did not issue a Default judgment yet. Brief is posted below. Due to some tampering with the site and difficulty in posting PDF files, Attorney Taitz will post 23 exhibits at a later time. On March 5th Taitz will be in Washington DC to discuss her petition for the Judiciary Committee to hear the issue of Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen CT SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is using, but which failed E-verify." - OrlyTaitzEsq.com.
EXCERPTS VIA EMERGENCY PETITION:
EMERGENCY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS FOR THE DISTRICT COURT TO ISSUE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT BARACK OBAMA AND CONTEMPORANEOUS PETITION FOR A STAY OF ALL OTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE UNTIL THE ISSUE OF THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT IS ADJUDICATED
SUMMARY OF THE CASE AND REQUESTED RELIEF
Plaintiffs herein are Presidential Electors and Presidential Candidates. Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Harrison (Harry) J. Bounel going under the pseudonym Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter “Obama”) is the main defendant in this case, who was sued as an individual, as a candidate for office and who defaulted. Notice of Default and request for Default Judgment is attached herein as Exhibit 1. Answer (or responsive pleading) was due on January 25th, Obama did not file an answer and defaulted. In their complaint Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs provided the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Complaint 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and experts showing that Barack Obama is:
1. A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency. Exhibit 2
2. Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport (Exhibit 3). As seen in Ms. Dunham’s passport records, her son was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham which was witnessed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport, is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is clear that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed (crossed out) from his mother’s passport when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiffs provided affidavits from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio (Exhibit 4), Investigator Zullo (Exhibit 5), experts Felicito Papa (Exhibit 6), Douglas Vogt (Exhibit 7), Paul Irey (Exhibit 8), showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document. Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates
A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or the circumstances make it unfair to admit the duplicate.Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the alleged birth certificate (Exhibit 5). After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio (Exhibit 4), investigator Zullo (Exhibit 5) and Chief Investigator of the Special Investigations Unit of the U.S. Coast Guard Jeffrey Stefan Coffman (Ret) (Exhibit 9) alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate is COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery.
According to 5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service. [...]
CONCLUSION AND REQUESTED RELIEF:
Plaintiffs are seeking a Writ of Mandamus stating as follows:
1. Obama was sued as a candidate for the position of the US President, not as a sitting President and was required to answer within 21 days.
2. Obama did not answer within 21 days.
3. District court is to issue a Default Judgment at the earliest possible time.
4. Due to evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, showing Obama to be a foreign citizen who ran for the US President using forged IDs, a stolen Social Security number from a state where he never resided and a last name not legally his, this is a matter of the outmost importance for the U.S. National security and has to be decided as soon as possible.
5. As Obama was sued as a candidate for office, he was not entitled to legal representation at the taxpayers’ expense by the US Attorneys’ office. US Attorneys’ office/Department of Justice are not allowed to represent Obama in this case and have to reimburse the taxpayers for the cost of this representation.
6. District Court should investigate actions by the US Attorneys’ office in filing pleadings, claiming to represent the US Congress and US Electoral college and not advising the US Congress and US electoral college of such representation and acting against the best interests of their clients and against the will of their clients. [...]
FULL PETITION BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/127726834
Affidavit: Sheriff Joe Arpaio; Obama's Selective Service Registration & Birth Certificate - DETAILS HERE.
Affidavit: Sheriff Joe's Lead Investigator Mike Zullo; Obama's Forged Identity Records - DETAILS HERE.
Affidavit: DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman; Obama Selective Service Registration Forged - DETAILS HERE.
Affidavit: Debt Collector Al Hendershot; Obama Using Harry Bounel's Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE.
FLASHBACK: Video Of Oral Arguments For Keyes/Barnett Et Al V. Obama; Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals - VIDEO HERE.
PREVIOUS REPORTS: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/search?q=Grinols
Grinols v Electoral College - Obama Electoral Challenge - Emergency Petition - 2/27/2012 by ObamaRelease YourRecords
WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERE: CLICK HERE.
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
.jpg)
